Urinary Incontinence: Minimally Invasive Techniques and Evidence-Based Results

Chapter

Abstract

Mid-urethral slings (MUS) have become the cornerstone in the treatment of women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). This minimally invasive approach has been widely adopted by gynecologists and urologists and has achieved standard of care status. As the surgical technique has been standardized, patient selection for each type of sling type is critical to optimizing success and minimize complications. Transobturator (TO) slings are most useful for mild to moderate severity SUI, while retropubic (RP) slings are indicated for greater severity of SUI (intrinsic sphincteric deficiency). Complications are relatively minor with TO slings (groin pain) but can be more severe with RP slings where the needle passage tract is rather blind. Newer single-incision approaches have become popular but have not reached widespread acceptance.

Recent anti-mesh legal action in the United States has expanded from prolapse to anti-SUI mesh usage. Long-term data on safety and effectiveness of the MUS strongly supports the widespread use of this technique.

Keywords

Stress urinary incontinence Continence mechanism Mid-urethral slings Retropubic slings Tension-free vaginal tape Transobturator tape Mini-slings Intrinsic sphincter deficiency 

References

  1. 1.
    Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(1):5–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Solans-Domenech M, Sanchez E, Espuna-Pons M, Pelvic Floor Research G. Urinary and anal incontinence during pregnancy and postpartum: incidence, severity, and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(3):618–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    JM W, Hundley AF, Fulton RG, Myers ER. Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. Women: 2010 to 2050. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(6):1278–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wilson L, Brown JS, Shin GP, Luc KO, Subak LL. Annual direct cost of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(3):398–406.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu JM, Kawasaki A, Hundley AF, Dieter AA, Myers ER, Sung VW. Predicting the number of women who will undergo incontinence and prolapse surgery, 2010 to 2050. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(3):230.e1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    JM W, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson Funk M. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1201–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stothers L, Friedman B. Risk factors for the development of stress urinary incontinence in women. Curr Urol Rep. 2011;12(5):363–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dumoulin C, Hay-Smith J. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;1:CD005654.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davila GW. Introl bladder neck support prosthesis: a nonsurgical urethropexy. J Endourol. 1996;10(3):293–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davila GW, Kondo A. Introl bladder neck support prosthesis: international clinical experience. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1997;8(5):301–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G. An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996;7(2):81–5; discussion 5–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Von Bargen E, Patterson D. Cost utility of the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21(3):150–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Labrie J, Berghmans BL, Fischer K, Milani AL, van der Wijk I, Smalbraak DJ, et al. Surgery versus physiotherapy for stress urinary incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(12):1124–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Richardson ML, Sokol ER. A cost-effectiveness analysis of conservative versus surgical management for the initial treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(5):565.e1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Petros PE, Ulmsten UI. An integral theory and its method for the diagnosis and management of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1993;153:1–93.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    DeLancey JO. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(6):1713–20; discussion 20–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Petros PE, Ulmsten UI. An integral theory of female urinary incontinence. Experimental and clinical considerations. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1990;153:7–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nager CW, Brubaker L, Litman HJ, Zyczynski HM, Varner RE, Amundsen C, et al. A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(21):1987–97.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lapitan MC, Cody JD. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;6:CD002912.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Glazener, Cooper K. Bladder neck needle suspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;17(12):CD003636.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, Kenton K, Norton PA, Sirls LT, et al. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(22):2066–76.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brubaker L, Norton PA, Albo ME, Chai TC, Dandreo KJ, Lloyd KL, et al. Adverse events over two years after retropubic or transobturator midurethral sling surgery: findings from the Trial of Midurethral Slings (TOMUS) study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(5):498.e1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Andonian S, Chen T, St-Denis B, Corcos J. Randomized clinical trial comparing suprapubic arch sling (SPARC) and tension-free vaginal tape (TVT): one-year results. Eur Urol. 2005;47(4):537–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Ogah J. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;7:CD006375.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dargent D, Bretones S, George P, Mellier G. Insertion of a sub-urethral sling through the obturating membrane for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2002;30(7–8):576–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ogah J, Cody JD, Rogerson L. Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;4:Cd006375.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schimpf MO, Rahn DD, Wheeler TL, Patel M, White AB, Orejuela FJ, et al. Sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(1):71.e1–e27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ward KL, Hilton P. Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up. BJOG. 2008;115(2):226–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Abdel-Fattah M, Ramsay I, Pringle S, Hardwick C, Ali H, Young D, et al. Randomised prospective single-blinded study comparing 'inside-out' versus 'outside-in' transobturator tapes in the management of urodynamic stress incontinence: 1-year outcomes from the E-TOT study. BJOG. 2010;117(7):870–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Madhuvrata P, Riad M, Ammembal MK, Agur W, Abdel-Fattah M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of “inside-out” versus “outside-in” transobturator tapes in management of stress urinary incontinence in women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;162(1):1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nilsson CG, Palva K, Rezapour M, Falconer C. Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(8):1043–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Crystle CD, Charme LS, Copeland WE. Q-tip test in stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1971;38(2):313–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schierlitz L, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, Murray C, Thomas E, De Souza A, et al. Effectiveness of tension-free vaginal tape compared with transobturator tape in women with stress urinary incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(6):1253–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rezapour M, Falconer C, Ulmsten U. Tension-Free vaginal tape (TVT) in stress incontinent women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD)—a long-term follow-up. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12(Suppl 2):S12–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Smith AL, Karp DR, Aguilar VC, Davila GW. Repeat versus primary slings in patients with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(6):963–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ford AA, Ogah JA. Retropubic or transobturator mid-urethral slings for intrinsic sphincter deficiency-related stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(1):19–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nambiar A, Cody JD, Jeffery ST. Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;6:CD008709.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Barber MD, Weidner AC, Sokol AI, Amundsen CL, Jelovsek JE, Karram MM, et al. Single-incision mini-sling compared with tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(2 Pt 1):328–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bianchi-Ferraro AM, Jarmy-Di Bella ZI, Castro Rde A, Bortolini MA, Sartori MG, Girao MJ. Single-incision sling compared with transobturator sling for treating stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(9):1459–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lee JK, Rosamilia A, Dwyer PL, Lim YN, Muller R. Randomized trial of a single incision versus an outside-in transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 12 month results. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(1):35.e1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Abdel-Fattah M, Ford JA, Lim CP, Madhuvrata P. Single-incision mini-slings versus standard midurethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. Eur Urol. 2011;60(3):468–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tieu AL, Hegde A, Castillo PA, Davila GW, Aguilar VC. Transobturator versus single incision slings: 1-year results of a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Albo ME, Richter HE, Brubaker L, Norton P, Kraus SR, Zimmern PE, et al. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(21):2143–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Novara G, Artibani W, Barber MD, Chapple CR, Costantini E, Ficarra V, et al. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2010;58(2):218–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rehman H, Bezerra CC, Bruschini H, Cody JD. Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;1:CD001754.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ogah J, Cody DJ, Rogerson L. Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30(3):284–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Guerette NL, Bena JF, Davila GW. Transobturator slings for stress incontinence: using urodynamic parameters to predict outcomes. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(1):97–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Nager CW. Midurethral slings: evidence-based medicine vs the medicolegal system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(6):708.e1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Section of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic SurgeryCleveland Clinic FloridaWestonUSA

Personalised recommendations