Abstract
It is clear that Europe is still far from its target to halt the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services (EEA 2010a, b; European Commission 2015), and this is in large part due to biodiversity impacts in the wider environment, i.e. outside protected areas. Many such impacts are the result of multiple small, scattered developments that individually often do not justify refusal on environmental grounds, but nonetheless have substantial incremental and cumulative impacts; thereby leading to ‘death by 1000 cuts’. To tackle this problem and halt biodiversity losses, it is becoming increasingly evident that complementary measures to strict protection are required that have the realistic ambition of achieving no net loss, through the avoidance, minimisation and offsetting of residual impacts. Such no net loss/offset policies can form a key component of sustainable development in that they can help to regulate and manage necessary trade-offs between economic development and the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services (Quétier et al. 2014).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albrecht J, Schumacher J, Wende W (2014) The German impact mitigation regulation: a role model for a no net loss strategy and biodiversity offsets for halting the loss of biodiversity in the European Union? Environ Policy Law 44(3):317–325
Darbi M, Ohlenburg H, Herberg A, Wende W (2010) Impact mitigation and biodiversity offsets—compensation approaches from around the world. Naturschutz und Biologische Vielfalt 101, Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn – Bad Godesberg
EEA (2010a) Assessing biodiversity in Europe – the 2010 Report. EEA Technical Report No 5/2010, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen
EEA (2010b) EU 2010 biodiversity baseline. EEA Technical Report No 12/2010, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen
European Commission (2015) The mid-term review of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020, COM(2015) 478 final
Pilgrim JD, Brownlie S, Ekstrom JMM, Gardner TA, von Hase A, ten Kate K, Savy CE, Stephens RTT, Temple HJ, Treweek JR, Ussher GT, Ward G (2013) A process for assessing offsetability of biodiversity impacts. Conserv Lett 6(5):376–384
Quétier F, Regnery B, Levrel H (2014) No net loss of biodiversity or paper offsets? – a critical review of the French no net loss policy. Environ Sci Pol 38:120–131
Tucker GM, Allen B, Conway M, Dicki I, Hart K, Rayment M, Schulp CJE (2014) Policy options for an EU no net loss Initiative. Report to the European Commission (with Annexes), Institute for European Environmental Policy, London/Brussels
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tucker, G., Darbi, M., Wende, W., Quétier, F., Rayment, M. (2018). Conclusions: Lessons from Biodiversity Offsetting Experiences in Europe. In: Wende, W., Tucker, G ., Quétier, F., Rayment, M., Darbi, M. (eds) Biodiversity Offsets. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72581-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72581-9_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72579-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72581-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)