Modeling of Structures in Seismic Zone

  • Gian Paolo Cimellaro
  • Sebastiano Marasco
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 45)


This chapters describes the general procedure used to model a 3D frame using SAP2000. A ten-storey reinforced concrete building is assumed as case study. Four types of methods of analysis are analyzed for the case study building.


  1. Al-Chaar G, Issa M, Sweeney S (2002) Behavior of masonry-infilled nonductile reinforced concrete frames. J Struct Eng 128(8):1055–1063Google Scholar
  2. Bathe KJ, Wilson EL (1976) Numerical methods in finite element analysis, vol 197. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  3. CSI SV (2010) Integrated finite element analysis and design of structures basic analysis reference manual. Computers and Structures Inc., BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  4. Deierlein GG, Reinhorn AM, Willford MR (2010) Nonlinear structural analysis for seismic design. NEHRP Seism Des Tech Brief 4:1–36Google Scholar
  5. EN B (2005) 10080–steel for the reinforcement of concrete–weldable reinforcing steel–general. Central Secretariat, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  6. EN-1996 (2009) General rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry. European committee for standardizationGoogle Scholar
  7. FEMA356 (2000) Prestandard commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA-356, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. FEMA (2012) Fema p-58-1: seismic performance assessment of buildings. Volume 1–methodologyGoogle Scholar
  9. Institution BS (2004) Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures: part 1–1: general rules and rules for buildings. British Standards InstitutionGoogle Scholar
  10. Ireland M, Pampanin S, Bull D (2006) Concept and implementation of a selective weakening approach for the seismic retrofit of RC buildingsGoogle Scholar
  11. Moehle JP (2000) State of research on seismic retrofit of concrete building structures in the us. In: US-Japan symposium and workshop on seismic retrofit of concrete structuresGoogle Scholar
  12. Narasimhan H, Faber MH (2010) Categorisation and assessment of robustness related provisions in European standards. In: Proceedings of the joint workshop of COST actions TU0601 and E, vol 55Google Scholar
  13. NTC-08 (2008) Nuove Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica ItalianaGoogle Scholar
  14. Reitherman RK (2012) Earthquakes and engineers: an international history. American Society of Civil EngineersGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith BS, Carter C (1969) A method of analysis for infilled frames. Proc Inst Civ Eng 44(1):31–48Google Scholar
  16. UNI E (2006) 206-1:2006. Calcestruzzo-Specificazione, prestazione, produzione e conformitàGoogle Scholar
  17. Viti S, Cimellaro G, Reinhorn AM (2006) Retrofit of a hospital through strength reduction and enhanced damping. Smart Struct Syst Int J 2(4):339–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yang YB, Chang KC, Yau JD (2003) Base isolation. Earthquake engineering handbook. CRC Press LCC, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gian Paolo Cimellaro
    • 1
  • Sebastiano Marasco
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Structural, Geotechnical and Building Engineering (DISEG)Politecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations