Seismic Modeling of Infill Walls

  • Gian Paolo Cimellaro
  • Sebastiano Marasco
Chapter
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 45)

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the seismic modeling of infill walls. the first part of the chapter describes the main parameters of the infill walls which influences the displacement capacity of a frame system. the failure mechanism are also discussed considering the presence of the surrounding frame. a large variety of analytical models which take into account the presence of infill walls are detailed listed and explained. finally, the mechanisms of crisis of masonry panels (both in-plane and out of plane) are summarized.

References

  1. 1998-1 E (2004) Design of structures for earthquake resistance Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Chaar G, Issa M, Sweeney S (2002) Behavior of masonry-infilled nonductile reinforced concrete frames. J Struct Eng 128(8):1055–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Nimry H, Resheidat M, Al-Jamal M (2014) Ambient vibration testing of low and medium rise infilled RC frame buildings in jordan. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 59:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benjamin J, Williams H (1958) The Behavior of one-story brick shear walls. J Struct Eng Div. In: Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, American Society of Civil Engineers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett R, Fischer W, Flanagan R, Tenbus M (1996) Evaluation and analysis of the performance of masonary infills during the northridge earthquake. Journal article, Oak Ridge National Lab., Oak RidgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Bin Z (2006) Parametric study on the influence of infills on the displacement capacity of reinforced concrete frames for earthquake loss estimation. In: European school for advanced studies in reduction of seismic Ris, Rel Rui PinhoGoogle Scholar
  7. Crisafulli FJ (1997) Seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete structures with masonry infills. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, 404 pGoogle Scholar
  8. Decanini L, Fantin G (1986) Modelos simplificados de la mampostería incluida en porticos. Caracteristicas de stiffnessy resistencia lateral en estado limite Jornadas Argentinas de Ingeniería Estructural 2:817–836Google Scholar
  9. El-Dakhakhni WW, Elgaaly M, Hamid AA (2003) Three-strut model for concrete masonry-infilled steel frames. J Struct Eng 129(2):177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fiorato AE, Sozen MA, Gamble WL (1970) An investigation of the interaction of reinforced concrete frames with masonry filler walls. Report, University of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station. College of Engineering. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  11. Flanagan RD, Bennett RM (1999a) Arching of masonry infilled frames: Comparison of analytical methods. Pract Period Struct Des Constr 4(3):105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flanagan RD, Bennett RM (1999b) In-plane behavior of structural clay tile infilled frames. J Struct Eng 125(6):590–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galanti FM, Scarpas A, Vrouwenvelder AC (1970) Calibration of a numerical model for the simulation of masonry under earthquake loading. WIT Trans Built Environ 32:395-405. ISSN:1743–3509Google Scholar
  14. Gavrilovic P, Sendova V (1992) Experimental and analytical studies of infill walls in reinforced concrete structures. In: Tenth world conference earthquake engineering, MadridGoogle Scholar
  15. Holmes M (1961) Steel frames with brickwork and concrete infilling. Proc Inst Civ Eng 19(4):473–478Google Scholar
  16. Ishibashi K, Meli R, Alcocer S, Leon F, Sanchez T (1992) Experimental study on earthquake-resistant design of confined masonry structures. In: Proceedings of the tenth world conference on earthquake engineering, Madrid, pp 3469–3474Google Scholar
  17. Klinger R, Bertero V (1976) Infilled frames in earthquake resistant construction. Rep. EERC 76-32. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  18. Kwan KH, Liauw TC (1984) Nonlinear analysis of integral infilled frames. Eng Struct 6(3):223–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leuchars J, Scrivener J (1976) Masonry infill panels subjected to cyclic in-plane loading. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 9(2):122–131Google Scholar
  20. Liauw T, Lee S (1977) On the behaviour and the analysis of multi-storey infilled frames subjected to lateral loading. Proc Inst Civ Eng 63(3):641–656Google Scholar
  21. Luo Y, Durrani A, Conte J (1994) Equivalent frame analysis of flat plate buildings for seismic loading. J Struct Eng 120(7):2137–2155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mainstone RJ (1971) Summary of paper 7360. on the stiffness and strengths of infilled frames. Proc Inst Civ Eng 49(2):230Google Scholar
  23. Mallick D, Garg R (1971) Effect of openings on the lateral stiffness of infilled frames. Proc Inst Civ Eng 49(2):193–209Google Scholar
  24. Mallick D, Severn R (1967) The behaviour of infilled frames under static loading. Proc Inst Civ Eng 38(4):639–656Google Scholar
  25. Mehrabi AB, Benson Shing P, Schuller MP, Noland JL (1996) Experimental evaluation of masonry-infilled rc frames. J Struct Eng 122(3):228–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moghaddam H, Dowling PJ (1988) Earthquake resistant design of brick infilled frames. Brick and Block Masonry(8th IBMAC) London 2:774–784. Elsevier Applied ScienceGoogle Scholar
  27. Moroni MO, Astroza M, Gómez J, Guzmán R (1996) Establishing rw and cd factors for confined masonry buildings. J Struct Eng 122(10):1208–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Polliakov SV (1963) Masonry in framed buildings: an investigation into the strength and stiffness of masonry infilling. National Lending Library for Science and Technology, Boston SpaGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosenblueth E (1980) Design Of earthquake resistant structures. Pentech Press, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith BS, Carter C (1969) A method of analysis for infilled frames. Proc Inst Civ Eng 44(1):31–48Google Scholar
  31. Smith BS, Coull A, Stafford-Smith BS (1991) Tall building structures: analysis and design, vol 5. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Smolira M (1973) Analysis of infilled shear walls. Proc Inst Civ Eng 55(4):895–912Google Scholar
  33. Tucker C (2007) Predicting the in-plane capacity of masonry infilled frames: a dissertation presented to the faculty of the graduate school. Tennessee Technological UniversityGoogle Scholar
  34. Valiasis T (1989) Experimental investigation of the behaviour of r/c frames filled with masonry panels and subjected cyclic horizontal load–analytical modelling of the masonry panel. Phd thesis, Ph.D. thesis (in Greek), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, ThessalonikiGoogle Scholar
  35. Wood R (1978) Plasticity, composite action and collapse design of unreinforced shear wall panels in frames. Proc Inst Civ Eng 65(2):381–411Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gian Paolo Cimellaro
    • 1
  • Sebastiano Marasco
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Structural, Geotechnical and Building Engineering (DISEG)Politecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations