• Gian Paolo Cimellaro
  • Sebastiano Marasco
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 45)


The chapter illustrates the capabilities of the OPENSIGNAL computer-based platform environment (Cimellaro GP, Marasco S, Frontiers in Built Environment 1:17, 2015) for processing and selecting the seismic input to be used in the seismic analyses. All the features and the software components are explained in detail and an illustrative application is reported.


  1. Ambraseys NN, Simpson KA, Bommer J (1996) Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25(4):371–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bardet J, Ichii K, Lin C (2000) EERA: a computer program for equivalent-linear earthquake site response analyses of layered soil deposits. University of Southern California, Department of Civil EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  3. Boore DM (2003) Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. In: Seismic motion, lithospheric structures, earthquake and volcanic sources: the Keiiti Aki volume. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 635–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of pga, pgv, and 5 between 0.01 and 10.0 s. Earthq Spectra 24(1):99–138. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2008) Nga ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of pga, pgv, pgd and 5 spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s. Earthq Spectra 24(1):139–171. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cimellaro GP (2013) Correlation in spectral accelerations for earthquakes in europe. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42(4):623–633. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cimellaro GP, De Stefano A (2010) Correlation in spectral accelerations of European ground motion records. In: Proceedings of 9NCEE, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  8. Cimellaro GP, Marasco S (2015) A computer-based environment for processing and selection of seismic ground motion records: Opensignal. Front Built Environ 1:17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cimellaro GP, Reinhorn AM, D’Ambrisi A, De Stefano M (2011) Fragility analysis and seismic record selection. J Struct Eng, ASCE 137(3):379–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Contreras V, Boroschek R (2012) Strong ground motion attenuation relations for chilean subduction zone interface earthquakes. In: Proceedings of 15WCEE, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  11. Hachem MM (2004) Bispec: a nonlinear spectral analysis program that performs bi-direction dynamic time-history analysis of pendulum system. University of California at Berkeley. Available online at Google Scholar
  12. Hudson M, Idriss I, Beikae M (1994) Users manual for quad4m: a computer program to evaluate the seismic response of soil structures using finite element procedures and incorporating a compliant base. University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar
  13. Iyengar R, Chadha R, Balaji Rao K, Raghukanth S (2010) Development of probabilistic seismic hazard map of india. Report on the National Disaster Management Authority, Government of India, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  14. Katsanos EI, Sextos AG (2013) Issars: an integrated software environment for structure-specific earthquake ground motion selection. Adv Eng Softw 58:70–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marasco S, Cimellaro GP (2017) A new energetic based ground motion selection and modification algorithm. In: Proceedings of 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 16WCEE, Paper N 1645, 9th to 13th Jan 2017, International Association on Earthquake EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  16. Yamamoto Y (2011) Stochastic model for earthquake ground motion using wavelet packets. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, 295 pGoogle Scholar
  17. Yamamoto Y, Baker JW (2013) Stochastic model for earthquake ground motion using wavelet packets. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103(6):3044–3056CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gian Paolo Cimellaro
    • 1
  • Sebastiano Marasco
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Structural, Geotechnical and Building Engineering (DISEG)Politecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations