Earthquake Prediction

  • Gian Paolo Cimellaro
  • Sebastiano Marasco
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 45)


The chapter introduces some of seismic prediction methods proposed in the last 50 years. Having in mind the physical and statistical limits in earthquake predictability, the earthquake prediction methods are impartially reported in this chapter.


  1. Bakun WH, Lindh AG (1985) The parkfield, California, prediction experiment. Earthq Prediction Res 3(3–4):285–304Google Scholar
  2. Bernard P, Le Mouel J (1996) On electrotelluric signals. A critical review of VAN, pp 118–152Google Scholar
  3. Brown R, Kulik J (1977) Flashbulb memories. Cognition 5(1):73–99Google Scholar
  4. Cicerone RD, Ebel JE, Britton J (2009) A systematic compilation of earthquake precursors. Tectonophysics 476(3):371–396Google Scholar
  5. Geller RJ (1997) Earthquake prediction: a critical review. Geophys J Int 131(3):425–450Google Scholar
  6. Hammond AL (1973) Earthquake predictions: breakthrough in theoretical insight? Science (NY) 180(4088):851Google Scholar
  7. Harris RA (1998) Forecasts of the 1989 Loma Prieta, California, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88(4):898–916Google Scholar
  8. Jordan T, Chen YT, Gasparini P, Madariaga R, Main I, Marzocchi W, Papadopoulos G, Yamaoka K, Zschau J (2011) Operational earthquake forecasting: state of knowledge and guidelines for implementation. Ann GeophysGoogle Scholar
  9. Kantorovich L, Keilis-Borok V (1991) Earthquake prediction and decision-making: social, economic and civil protection aspects. In: International conference on earthquake prediction: state-of-the-art, pp 586–593Google Scholar
  10. Keilis-Borok V, Rotwain I (1990) Diagnosis of time of increased probability of strong earthquakes in different regions of the world: algorithm CN. Phys Earth Planet Inter 61(1–2):57–72Google Scholar
  11. Kossobokov VG (2013) Earthquake prediction: 20 years of global experiment. Nat Hazards 69(2):1155–1177Google Scholar
  12. Gruppo di Lavoro MP (2004) Redazione della mappa di pericolosità sismica prevista dall’Ordinanza PCM 3274 del 20 marzo 2003. Rapporto Conclusivo per il Dipartimento della Protezione Civile, INGV, Milano-Roma, 5 Apr 2004Google Scholar
  13. Lindh A, Lockner D, Lee W (1978) Velocity anomalies: an alternative explanation. Bull Seismol Soc Am 68(3):721–734Google Scholar
  14. Lott DF, Hart BL, Howell MW (1981) Retrospective studies of unusual animal behavior as an earthquake predictor. Geophys Res Lett 8(12):1203–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Panza G, Peresan A, Magrin A (2014) Neo-deterministic seismic hazard scenarios for friuli venezia giulia and surrounding areas. Report, ISPRA– Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale – Servizio Geologico d’ItaliaGoogle Scholar
  16. Park SK (1996) Precursors to earthquakes: seismoelectromagnetic signals. Surv Geophys 17(4):493–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Peresan A, Kossobokov V, Romashkova L, Panza G (2005) Intermediate-term middle-range earthquake predictions in Italy: a review. Earth-Sci Rev 69(1):97–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Peresan A, Zuccolo E, Vaccari F, Gorshkov A, Panza GF (2011) Neo-deterministic seismic hazard and pattern recognition techniques: time-dependent scenarios for North-Eastern Italy. Pure Appl Geophys 168(3–4):583–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Peresan A, Kossobokov VG, Panza GF (2012) Operational earthquake forecast/prediction. Rendiconti Lincei-Scienze Fisiche E Naturali 23(2):131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pitari G, Coppari E, De Luca N, Di Carlo P (2014) Observations and box model analysis of radon-222 in the atmospheric surface layer at Laquila, Italy: March 2009 case study. Environ Earth Sci 71(5):2353–2359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Silver PG, Valettesilver NJ (1992) Detection of hydrothermal precursors to large northern California earthquakes. Science 257(5075):1363–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. USGS (2008) The 2008 U.S. geological survey national seismic hazard maps.
  23. Varotsos P, Alexopoulos K, Nomicos K (1981) Seven-hour precursors to earthquakes determined from telluric currents. Praktika Acad Athens 56:417–433Google Scholar
  24. Whitcomb JH, Garmany JD, Anderson DL (1973) Earthquake prediction – variation of seismic velocities before San Francisco earthquake. Science 180(4086):632–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gian Paolo Cimellaro
    • 1
  • Sebastiano Marasco
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Structural, Geotechnical and Building Engineering (DISEG)Politecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations