Advertisement

Optimal Child Benefits and Income Taxes

  • András Simonovits
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter deals with optimal child benefits when fertility is endogenous and younger workers raise children and older workers only contribute to financing the child benefits. It is assumed that the wages are heterogeneous and personal income taxes finance only benefits but a basic income for everybody. Earlier models worked with homogeneous wages and assumed that the child benefit is only spent on raising children. Now the raising cost of a child is proportional to the net family income, containing the child benefits. The parent’s consumption becomes a nonlinear function of the fertility, which complicates the analysis but avoids absurdities. The main results is that child benefit is socially optimal if an only if the past fertility rate was less than 2 (1 in our unisex model).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. App, P., & Rees, R. (2012). Optimal Taxation, Child Care and Models for Households (Discussion Paper 6823). Bonn: IZA.Google Scholar
  2. Augusztinovics, M. (1989). The Costs of Human Life. Economic Systems Research, 1, 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S. (1960). An Economic Analysis of Fertility. In R. Esterline (Ed.), Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1991). A Treatise on the Family, an enlarged edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, G. S., & Barro, R. (1988). A Reformulation of the Economic Theory of Fertility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cigno, A. (1986). Fertility and the Tax-Benefit System. Economic Journal, 96, 1035–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cremer, H., Gahvari, F., & Pestieau, P. (2008). Pensions with Heterogeneous Individuals and Endogenous Fertility. Journal of Population Economics, 21, 961–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fehr, H., Kallweit, M., & Kindermann, F. (2016). Household Formation, Female Labor Supply and Saving. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 118, 868–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fenge, R., & Meier, R. (2009). Are Family Benefits and Fertility Related Pensions Perfect Substitutes? International Tax and Public Finance, 16, 137–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gábos, A., Gál, R. I., & Kézdi, G. (2009). The Effects of Child-Related Benefits and Pensions on Fertility by Birth-Order. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography, 16, 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenwood, J., Sheshadri, A., & Vandenbroucke, G. (2005). The Baby Boom and Baby Bust. American Economic Review, 95, 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haan, P., & Wrohlich, K. (2011). Can Child Care Policy Encourage Employment and Fertility. Labour Economics, 18, 498–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hakim, C. (2003). A New Approach to Explaining Fertility Patterns: Preference Theory. Population and Development Review, 29, 349–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lindbeck, A., Nyberg, S., & Weibull, J. W. (1999). Social Norms and the Welfare State. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pestieau, P., & Ponthiere, G. (2014). Policy Implications for Changing Longevity. CESifo Economic Studies, 60, 178–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Samuelson, P. A. (1958). An Exact Consumption-Loan Model of Interest with or Without the Social Contrivance of Money. Journal of Political Economy, 66, 467–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Simonovits, A. (2013). Savings, Child Support, Pensions and Endogenous (and Heterogeneous) Fertility (IE-CERS-HAS Working Paper 35).Google Scholar
  18. Simonovits, A. (2015). Socially Optimal Child-Related Transfers with Endogenous Fertility (IE-CERS-HAS Working Paper 37).Google Scholar
  19. van Groezen, B., Leers, T., & Meijdam, L. (2003). Social Security and Endogenous Fertility: Pensions and Child Benefits as Siamese Twins. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hungarian Academy of SciencesBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations