Skip to main content

The Emergence of Adaptive Governance in the Klamath River Basin

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practical Panarchy for Adaptive Water Governance

Abstract

The Klamath River Basin of south-central Oregon and northern California has been the locus of historic conflict over the governance of water situated at the spiritual, cultural, and economic confluence of fishing and farming livelihoods. In recent years, a series of crises have impacted communities and stakeholder groups across the basin and jeopardized the continued existence of endangered and threatened fish species as well as the dominant economic and social relations in the basin. From these crises, however, a set of human-driven processes emerged that closely resemble the seeds of adaptive environmental governance. This chapter describes social-ecological system structures and dynamics that led to this potential emergence of adaptive governance in the Klamath River Basin. The major aim of this chapter is to critically evaluate the role of law in the basin as a tool for both creating disturbances and opening windows of opportunity through which adaptive processes could emerge. The major insight from the Klamath case is that the distribution and application of political power cannot be underestimated as either a barrier or facilitator of adaptive governance. Without an explicit recognition and analysis of power dynamics, adaptive governance scholarship lacks a critical lens to interrogate the contexts of governance transitions and evaluate the potential for new arrangements to attain explicit goals such as the sustainability of ecosystem services, the fair allocation of resources, and other principles of good governance that promote social and environmental justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • California Department of Fish and Game (2004) Klamath river Fish-Kill: final analysis of contributing factors and impacts. The Resources Agency, California. http://www.pcffa.org/KlamFishKillFactorsDFGReport.pdf. Accessed 16 Apr 2014

  • Chaffin BC (2014) Reallocating resources, rebuilding community: the Klamath Basin agreements and the emergence of adaptive governance. Dissertation, Oregon State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin BC, Gunderson LH (2016) Emergence, institutionalization and renewal: rhythms of adaptive governance in complex social-ecological systems. J Environ Manag 165:81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin B, Craig RK, Gosnell H (2014) Resilience, adaptation, and transformation in the Klamath River Basin social-ecological system. Idaho Law Rev 51:157–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin BC, Garmestani AS, Gosnell H, Craig RK (2016a) Institutional networks and adaptive water governance in the Klamath River Basin, USA. Environ Sci Pol 57:112–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin BC, Garmestani AS, Gunderson LH, Benson MH, Angeler DG, Arnold CA, Cosens B, Craig RK, Ruhl JB, Allen CR (2016b) Transformative environmental governance. Annu Rev Environ Resour 41:399–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosens BA, Craig RK, Hirsch S, Arnold CA, Benson MH, DeCaro DA, Garmestani AS, Gosnell H, Ruhl JB, Schlager E (2017) The role of law in adaptive governance. Ecol Soc 22(1):30. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-08731-220130

  • Craig RK, Garmestani AS, Allen CR, Arnold CA, Birgé H, DeCaro DA, Fremier AK, Gosnell H, Schlager E (2017) Balancing stability and flexibility in adaptive governance: an analysis of tools available in U.S. environmental law. Ecol Soc 22(2):3. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-08983-220203

  • DeCaro DA, Chaffin BC, Schlager E, Garmestani AS, Ruhl JB (2017a) Legal and institutional foundations of adaptive environmental governance. Ecol Soc 22(1):32. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-09036-220132

  • DeCaro DA, Arnold C.A.T, Boamah EF, Garmestani AS (2017b) Understanding and applying principles of social cognition and decision making in adaptive environmental governance. Ecol Soc 22(1):33. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-09154-220133

  • Doremus H, Tarlock AD (2008) Water war in the Klamath Basin: macho law, combat biology, and dirty politics. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosnell H, Kelly EC (2010) Peace on the river? Social-ecological restoration and large dam removal in the Klamath basin, USA. Water Altern 3:361–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosnell H, Chaffin BC, Arnold CA, Craig RK, Benson MH, Devenish A (2017) From detonator to stabilizer: rethinking the role of the Endangered Species Act’s Section 7 consultation process in social-ecological system dynamics. Ecol Soc 22(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/es-05116-170428

  • Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement (2016) United States Department of Interior. https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/FINAL%20KHSA%20PDF.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2017

  • Messier JY (2012) Conflict in the Klamath watershed and a relationship-building framework for conflict transformation. Dissertation, George Mason University

    Google Scholar 

  • Most S (2006) River of renewal: myth & history in the Klamath Basin. Oregon State University Press, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2004) Endangered and threatened fishes in the Klamath River Basin: causes of decline and strategies for recovery. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon KM, Elliot AJ, Kim Y, Kasser T (2001) What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. J Pers Soc Psychol 80(2):325–339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MD (2013) Political ecology I: an alliance with resilience? Prog Hum Geogr 38(4):616–623. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513502770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler TR (2006) Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimization. Annu Rev Psychol 57:375–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RM (2010) Seeking refuge: birds and landscapes of the pacific flyway. University of Washington Press, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

Judicial Opinions

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was developed in part under the Adaptive Water Governance Project, funded by the US National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) under funding from the US National Science Foundation, NSF DBI-1052875.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian C. Chaffin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chaffin, B.C., Gosnell, H., Craig, R.K. (2018). The Emergence of Adaptive Governance in the Klamath River Basin. In: Cosens, B., Gunderson, L. (eds) Practical Panarchy for Adaptive Water Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72472-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics