Abstract
The Columbia River is a complex water basin shared by 2 countries, 15 Native American Tribes, 15 First Nations, 7 US states, and 1 Canadian province. Dam construction during the twentieth century has engendered a basin economy that is dependent on low-cost electricity and irrigated agriculture. Yet, these dams are a major factor in the decline of populations of salmon and steelhead species that are critical to the culture of Indigenous peoples. Climate change scenarios predict a transformation from snow- to rain-dominated precipitation in the basin’s lower latitudes, greater extremes in flood and drought, and an increasing water deficit as a result of higher rates of evapotranspiration with increasing temperature. Reduced late summer flow may pose challenges for the sustainability of irrigation and fish. The basin provides a unique laboratory to explore resilience of a highly developed social-ecological system to changing climate and rising empowerment of Indigenous peoples. Review of the Columbia River Treaty between the United States and Canada that governs much of the operation of the river presents a window of opportunity for change. This window provides a moment in time to rethink environmental governance and to consider an approach which reflects neither top-down nor bottom-up control of resources but a third path in which each level of government plays a supporting role to a regional vision of the basin’s future governance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abatzoglou J, Rupp D, Mote P (2014) Understanding seasonal climate variability and change in the Pacific Northwest of the United States. J Clim 27:2125–2142
Balkwill D, Duffin A (2008) Plowed under: agriculture and environment in the Palouse. University of Washington, Seattle
Bankes N, Cosens B (2014) Protocols for adaptive water governance: the future of the Columbia River Treaty. In: Program on water issues. Munk School of Global Affairs. University of Toronto. http://powi.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Protocols-for-Adaptive-Water-Governance-Final-October-14-2014.pdf. Accessed 22 July 2017
Barbar K (2006) Indigenous regulations of the harvest, in canneries on the Columbia: a new western history, narrative. In: The Oregon history project. http://www.ohs.org/the-oregon-history-project/narratives/canneries-on-the-columbia/native-fishery-katrine-barber/indigenous-regulations-of-harvest.cfm. Accessed 22 July 2017
Barton J, Ketchum K (2012) Columbia River Treaty: managing for uncertainty. In: Cosens B (ed) The Columbia River Treaty revisited: transboundary river governance in the face of uncertainty. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis
Blumm M (2002) Sacrificing the Salmon: a legal and policy history of the decline of Columbia Basin Salmon. BookWorld, Oshkosh
Bottom, D, Jones K, Simenstad C, Smith C eds. (2009) Pathways to resilient salmon ecosystems. Ecol Soc 14(1):34 [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/issues/view.php?sf=34
British Columbia (2013) Columbia River Treaty Review: B.C. Decision. B.C. Government. http://blog.gov.bc.ca/columbiarivertreaty/files/2012/03/BC_Decision_on_Columbia_River_Treaty.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2017
Brunner R, Colburn C, Cromley C, Klein RA, Olson EA (2002) Finding common ground: governance and natural resources in the American west. Yale University Press, New Haven
Cecchini-Beaver, M (2013) Transboundary Columiba River operational alternative analysis in a collaborative framework. Masters Thesis in Water Resources, University of Idaho. http://www.lib.uidaho.edu/digital/etd/. Accessed 23 July 2017
Chaffin B, Gosnell H, Cosens B (2014) A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: synthesis and future directions. Ecol Soc 19(3):56. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06824-190356. Accessed 26 August 2017
Chaffin B, Garmestani A, Gunderson L, Benson MH, Angeler DG, Arnold CA, Cosens BA, Craig RK, Ruhl JB, Allen CR (2016) Transformative environmental governance. Annu Rev Environ Resour 41:399–423
Columbia Basin Tribes (2010) Common views on the future of the Columbia River Treaty. http://www.usea.org/sites/default/files/event-/Common%20Views%20statement%20NQ.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2017
Columbia Basin Tribes and First Nations (2015) Fish passage and reintroduction into the U.S. & Canadian Upper Columbia Basin. http://www.ucut.org/Fish_Passage_and_Reintroduction_into_the_US_And_Canadian_Upper_Columbia_River3.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2017
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (1995) Spirit of the Salmon. http://plan.critfc.org/2013/spirit-of-the-salmon-plan/about-spirit-of-the-salmon/. Accessed 23 July 2017 (1995 and 2014 update)
Cosens B (2006) The role of hydrology in the resolution of water disputes. J Contemp Water Res Educ: River Adjudications 133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-704X.2006.mp133001004.x/epdf. Available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1936-704X.2006.mp133001004.x/epdf. Accessed 26 Aug 2017
Cosens B (2008) Resolving conflict in non-ideal, complex systems: solutions for the law-science breakdown in environmental and natural resource law. Nat Resour J 48:257–301
Cosens B (2012) Changes in empowerment: rising voices in Columbia Basin resource management. In: Cosens B (ed) Columbia River Treaty revisited: transboundary river governance in the face of uncertainty. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis
Cosens B (2016) The Columbia River Treaty: an opportunity for modernization of basin governance. Colorado Nat Resourc Energy Environ Law Rev 27(1): 1–19. Available at http://www.colorado.edu/law/sites/default/files/CNREELR-V27-I1-Cosens%20Final_0.pdf. Accessed 26 August 2017
Cosens B, Fremier A (2014) Assessing system resilience and ecosystem services in large River Basins: a case study of the Columbia River Basin. Idaho Law Rev 51:91–125
Cosens B, Williams M (2013) Resilience and water governance: adaptive governance in the Columbia River Basin. Ecol Soc 17(4) Art. 3. URL: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04986-170403. Accessed 26 Aug 2017
Cosens B, Fremier A, Bankes N, Abatzoglou J (2016) The Columbia River Treaty and the dynamics of transboundary water negotiations in a changing environment: how might climate change alter the game? In: Water policy and planning in a variable and changing climate. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Cosens B, Craig R, Hirsch S, Arnold CA, Benson MH, DeCaro DA, Garmestani AS, Gosnell H, Ruhl JB, Schlager E (2017) The role of law in adaptive governance. Ecol Soc 22(1):30. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08731-220130. Accessed 26 August 2017
Craig R, Garmestani A, Allen C, Arnold CA, Birgé H, DeCaro DA, Fremier AK, Gosnell H, Schlager E (2017) Balancing stability and flexibility in adaptive governance: an analysis of tools available in U.S. environmental law. Ecol Soc 22(2):3. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08983-220203
DeCaro D, Arnold C, Boamah E, Garmestani AS (2017a) Understanding and applying principles of social cognition and decision making in adaptive environmental governance. Ecol Soc 22(1):33. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09154-220133
DeCaro D, Chaffin B, Schlager E, Garmestani AS, Ruhl JB (2017b) Legal and institutional foundations of adaptive environmental governance. Ecol Soc 22(1):32. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09036-220132. Accessed 26 Aug 2017
Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern P (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:1907–1912. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091015. Accessed 26 Aug 2017
Emery M, Flora C (2006) Spiraling-up: mapping community transformation with community capitals framework. Commun Dev 37(1):19–35
Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511. Accessed 26 August 2017
Foundation for Water Energy and Education (2016) What makes the Columbia River Basin unique and how we benefit. http://fwee.org/environment/what-makes-the-columbia-river-basin-unique-and-how-we-benefit/. Accessed 22 July 2017
Gunderson L, Holling C (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DC
Gunderson L, Cosens B, Chaffin B, Arnold CA, Fremier AK, Garmestani AS, Craig RK, Gosnell H, Birge HE, Allen CR, Benson MH, Morrison RR, Stone MC, Hamm JA, Nemec K, Schlager E, Llewellyn D (2017) Regime shifts and panarchies in regional scale social- ecological water systems. Ecol Soc 22(1):31. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08879-220131. Accessed: 26 Aug 2017
Hamlet A (2003) The role of transboundary agreements in the Columbia River basin: an integrated assessment in the context of historic development, climate, and evolving water policy. In: Diaz H, Morehouse B (eds) Climate and water: transboundary challenges in the Americas. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 263–289
Hamlet A, Mote P, Clark M, Lettenmaier DP (2007) 20th century trends in runoff, evapotranspiration, and soil moisture in the western U.S. J Clim 20:1468–1486
Hamlet A, Lee S, Mickelson K, Elsner MM (2010) Effects of projected climate change on energy supply and demand in the Pacific Northwest and Washington State. Clim Chang 102:103–128
Harrison J (2008) Fish Passage at Dams, North West Power & Conservation Council. http://www.nwcouncil.org/history/fishpassage. Accessed 23 July 2017
Healey M (2009) Resilient salmon, resilient fisheries for British Columbia, Canada. Ecol Soc 14(1): 2. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art2/
Hines D (1999) Tales of the Nez Perce. Ye Galleon Press, Fairfield
Hirt P (2008) Developing a plentiful resource: transboundary rivers in the Pacific Northwest. In: Whiteley JM, Ingram H, Perry R (eds) Water, place, and equity. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 147–188
Hirt P, Sowards A (2012) The past and future of the Columbia River. In: Cosens B (ed) The Columbia River Treaty revisited: transboundary river governance in the face of uncertainty. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis
Huitema D, Mostert E, Egas W, Moellenkamp S, Pahl-Wostl C, Yalcin R (2009) Adaptive water governance: assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co) management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecol Soc 14(1):26
Jiang H, Strittholt J, Frost P, Slosser NC (2004) The classification of late seral forests in the Pacific Northwest, USA using Landsat ETM+ imagery. Remote Sens Environ 91:320–221
Josephy A (1965) The Nez Perce Indians and the opening of the northwest. Yale University, New Haven
Karkkainen B (2013) The Great Lakes water resources compact and agreement: transboundary normativity without international law. William Mitchell Law Rev 39:997
Landeen D, Pinkham A (1999) Salmon and his people: fish and fishing in Nez Perce culture. Confluence Press, Lewiston
Lee K (1993) Compass and gyroscope: integrating science and politics for the environment. Island Press, Washington, DC
Lee K (1999) Appraising adaptive management. Conserv Ecol 3(2):3
Lee K, Lawrence J (1986) Adaptive management: learning from the Columbia River basin fish and wildlife program. Environ Law 16:431–460
Lockwood M, Davidson J, Curtis A, Stratford E, Griffith R (2010) Governance principles for natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 23(10):986–1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920802178214. Accessed 26 Aug 2017
Mann J (2004) Sacajawea’s people: the Lemhi Shoshones and the Salmon River country. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln
McGinnis M (ed) (1999) Polycentric governance and development: readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
Mote P, Hamlet A, Clark M, Lettenmaier DP (2005) Declining mountain snowpack in western North America. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 86:39–49
Mouat M (2012) The Columbia exchange: a Canadian perspective on the negotiation of the Columbia River Treaty. In: Cosens B (ed) The Columbia River Treaty revisited: transboundary river governance in the face of uncertainty. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis
NOAA Fisheries (n.d.) West Coast Salmon & Steelhead Listings. URL: http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/protected_species/salmon_steelhead/salmon_and_steelhead_listings/salmon_and_steelhead_listings.html
Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004) Adaptive co-management for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environ Manag 34:75–90
Olsson P, Gunderson L, Carpenter S, Ryan P, Lebel L, Folke C, Holling CS (2006) Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11(1):18 [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art18/. Accessed 26 Aug 2017
Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New York
Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Chang 19:354–365
Pearson M (2012) The river people and the importance of Salmon. In: Cosens B (ed) The Columbia River Treaty revisited: transboundary river governance in the face of uncertainty. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis
Peery C (2012) The effects of dams and flow management on Columbia River ecosystem processes. In: Cosens B (ed) The Columbia River Treaty revisited: transboundary river governance in the face of uncertainty. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis
Raadgever G, Mostert E, Kranz N, Interwies E, Timmerman JG (2008) Assessing management regimes in transboundary river basins: do they support adaptive management? Ecol Soc 13(1):14 [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art14/. Accessed 26 Aug 2017
Rogers P, Hall A (2003) Effective water governance. Global Water Partnership Technical Committee (TEC) background paper 7. Global water partnership, Stockholm. http://www.gwp.org/Global/ToolBox/Publications/Background%20papers/07%20Effective%20Water%20Governance%20%282003%29%20English.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2017
Shurts J (2012) Rethinking the Columbia River Treaty. In: Cosens B (ed) The Columbia River Treaty revisited: transboundary river governance in the face of uncertainty. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis
Stewart I, Cayan D, Dettinger M (2005) Changes toward earlier streamflow timing across western North America. J Clim 18:1136–1155
Thomas-Morse C (2012) When courts run regulated rivers: the effects of scientific uncertainty. In: Cosens B (ed) The Columbia River Treaty revisited: transboundary river governance in the face of uncertainty. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), and the United States Bureau of Reclamation (BoR) (1993, 1995, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2014) Federal Columbia river power system biological opinion. http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/fish_passage/fcrps_opinion/federal_columbia_river_power_system.html. Accessed 23 July 2017
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and the United States Bureau of Reclamation (BoR) (2001) The Columbia river system: inside story. https://www.bpa.gov/power/pg/columbia_river_inside_story.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2017
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Bonneville Power Administration (n.d.) Columbia River Treaty: 2012/2024 review. https://www.crt2014-2024review.gov/. Accessed 23 July 2017
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Bonneville Power Administration (2013) U.S. entity regional recommendation for the future of the Columbia River Treaty after 2014. http://www.crt2014-2024review.gov/Files/Regional%20Recommendation%20Final%2013%20DEC%202013.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2017
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2015). National hop report. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Regional_Office/Northwest/includes/Publications/Hops/Nat%20Hop%20Rept%202015.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2017
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). (n.d.) National agricultural statistics service. https://www.nass.usda.gov/. Accessed 23 July 2017
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2000) Findings and recommendations on issuance of an incidental take permit (TE034609-0) to Plum Creek Timber Company for their native fish habitat conservation plan for states of Montana, Idaho, and Washington
Universities Consortium on Columbia River Governance (UCCRG). (n.d.) http://www.columbiarivergovernance.org/. Accessed 23 July 2017
Vogel E (2012) Can an international treaty strengthen a region and further social and environmental inclusion? Lessons from the Columbia River Treaty. In: Cosens B (ed) The Columbia River Treaty revisited: transboundary river governance in the face of uncertainty. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis
Volkman J, McConnaha W (1993) Through a glass, darkly: Columbia River salmon, the Endangered Species Act, and adaptive management. Environ Law 23:1249–1272
Waples R, Beechie T, Press G (2009) Evolutionary history, habitat disturbance regimes, and anthropogenic changes: what do these mean for resilience of Pacific salmon populations? Ecol Soc 14(1):3. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art3/. Accessed 26 August 2017
White R (1995) The organic machine: the remaking of the Columbia River. Hill and Wang, New York
Wittstock L, Salinas E A (n.d.) Brief history of the American Indian movement. https://www.aimovement.org/ggc/history.html. Accessed 27 July 2017
Legal Documents
Great Lakes-Saint Lawrence River Basin Sustainable Water Resources Agreement. Dec. 13, 2005
Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Water Resources Compact. Pub. L. No. 110–342, 122 Stat. 3739 (2008)
Treaty Between the United States of America and Canada Relating to Cooperative Development of the Water Resources of The Columbia River Basin, U.S.-Can., Jan. 17, 1961, 15.2 U.S.T 1555 (CRT)
Listings of Anadromous Fish Populations
Code of Federal Regulations 50: § 223.102 (2013) (listing salmon species found in the Columbia Basin: Snake River Sockeye (endangered), Upper Willamette River Chinook (threatened), Lower Columbia River Chi-nook (threatened), Upper Columbia River spring-run Chinook (endangered), Snake River fall-run Chinook (threatened), Snake River spring/summer-run Chinook (threatened), Lower Columbia River Coho (threatened), and Columbia River Chum (threatened))
Endangered and Threatened Species: Final Protective Regulations for Threatened Upper Columbia River Steelhead, Federal Register 71: 5177, 5178 (Feb. 1, 2006);
Note that four evolutionarily significant units (ESUs) of steelhead are also currently listed. See Endangered and Threatened Species: Proposed Listing Determinations for 27 ESUs of West Coast Salmonids, Federal Register 69: 33102, 33105 (June 14, 2004);
See also Status of ESA Listings & Critical Habitat Designations for West Coast Salmon & Steelhead, NAT’L OCEANIC & ATMOSPHERIC ADMIN. FISHERIES (updated Oct. 31, 2012),
Judicial Opinions
Bonnichsen v. U.S. 367 F.3d 864 (9th Cir. 2004)
U.S. v. Washington. 20 F.Supp.3d 986, 1013 (W.D Washington 2013)
U.S. v. Winans, 198 US 371 (1905)
United States v. Washington, 384 F.Supp. 312 (D.Wash., 1974), aff’d by 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975), cert denied Washington v. U.S. 423 U.S. 1086 (1976)
Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass. 443 U.S. 658, 685 (1979)
Laws
Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act, (Northwest Power Act), Pub. L. No. 96–501, 94 Stat. 2697
Acknowledgments
This work was developed in part under the Adaptive Water Governance Project, funded by the US National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) under funding from the US National Science Foundation, NSF DBI-1052875.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cosens, B., Fremier, A. (2018). Social-Ecological Resilience in the Columbia River Basin: The Role of Law and Governance. In: Cosens, B., Gunderson, L. (eds) Practical Panarchy for Adaptive Water Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72472-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72472-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72470-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72472-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)