Abstract
Law dictates the structure, boundaries, rules, and processes within which governmental action takes place and in doing so becomes one of the focal points for analysis of governmental barriers to adaptation as the effects of climate change are felt. Governance encompasses both governmental and nongovernmental participation in collective choice and action. Adaptive governance contemplates a level of flexibility and evolution in governmental action beyond that currently found in the heavily administrative governments in the United States and Australia. Nevertheless, over time, law itself has proven highly adaptive in democracies, evolving to address and even facilitate the emergence of new social norms (such as the rights of women and minorities) or to provide remedies for emerging problems (such as pollution). Thus, law can adapt, evolve, and be reformed to facilitate adaptive governance. In doing so, not only may barriers be removed, but law may be adjusted to facilitate adaptive governance and to aid in institutionalizing new and emerging approaches to governance. The key is to do so in a way that also enhances legitimacy, accountability, and justice (i.e., good governance), or such reforms will never be adopted by democratic societies or, if adopted, will destabilize those very societies. By identifying those aspects of adaptive governance relevant to the legal system, this chapter presents guidelines for evaluating the role of law in environmental governance and demonstrates their use by applying them to the basin studies presented in Part I of this volume.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold CA (2010) Adaptive watershed planning and climate change. Environ Energy Law Policy J 5:417–488
Arnold CA (2014) Adaptive water law. Kansas Law Rev 62:101–149
Bingham LB (2009) Collaborative governance: emerging practices and the incomplete legal framework for public and stakeholder voice. J Dispute Resolut 2(2):1–58
Bingham LB (2010) The next generation of administrative law: building the legal infrastructure for collaborative governance. Wisconsin Law Rev 2010(2):297–356
Birgé HE, Allen CR, Craig RK, Garmestani AS, Hamm JA, Babbitt C, Nemec K, Schlager E (2014) Social-ecological resilience and law in the Platte River basin. Idaho Law Rev 51:229–256
Bodin Ö, Crona B (2009) The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference? Glob Environ Chang 19(3):366–374
Borrini-Feyerabend G, Dudley N, Jaeger T et al (2013) Governance of protected areas: from understanding to action. In: IUCN best practice protected area guidelines series no.20. http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/governance_web_1.pdf
Chaffin BC, Gosnell H, Cosens B (2014) A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: synthesis and future directions. Ecol Soc 19(3):56. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-06824-190356
Clarvis MH, Allan A, Hannah DM (2014) Water, resilience and the law: from general concepts and governance design principles to actionable mechanisms. Environ Sci Policy 43:98–110
Cosens B (2013) Legitimacy, adaptation, and resilience in ecosystem management. Ecol Soc 18(1):3. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05093-180103
Cosens B (2016a) Water law reform in the face of climate change: learning from drought in Australia and the Western United States. Environ Plan Law J 33:372
Cosens B (2016b) The Columbia river treaty: an opportunity for modernization of basin governance. Colorado Nat Res Energy Environ Law Rev 27(1):1–19. http://www.colorado.edu/law/sites/default/files/CNREELR-V27-I1-Cosens%20Final_0.pdf
Cosens B, Chaffin BC (2016) Adaptive governance of water resources shared with indigenous peoples: the role of law. Water 8(3):97. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8030097
Cosens B, Fremier A (2014) Assessing system resilience and ecosystem services in large river basins: a case study of the Columbia river basin. Idaho Law Rev 51:91–125
Cosens B, Stow C (2014) Resilience and water governance: addressing fragmentation and uncertainty in water allocation and water quality law. In: Garmestani A, Allen C (eds) Social-ecological resilience and law. Columbia University Press, New York
Cosens B, Craig RK, Hirsch S, Arnold CA, Benson MH, Chaffin B, DeCaro D, Garmestani AS, Gosnell H, Ruhl JB, Schlager E (2017) The role of law in adaptive governance. Ecol Soc 22(1):30. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-08731-220130
Craig RK, Ruhl JB (2014) Designing administrative law for adaptive management. Vanderbilt Law Rev 67:1
Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:1907–1912. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091015
Dublin statement on water and sustainable development (1992) International conference on water and environment, Dublin. http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/hwrp/documents/english/icwedece.html#principles. Accessed 27 July 2017
Esty DC (2006) Good governance at the supranational scale: globalizing administrative law. Yale Law J 115:1490–1562. https://doi.org/10.2307/20455663
Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
Garmestani AS, Benson MH (2013) A framework for resilience-based governance of social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 18(1):9. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-05180-180109
Godden L (2016) Trans-jurisdictional water governance: law’s role at multiple levels. In: Gray J, Holley C, Rayfuse R (eds) Trans-jurisdictional water law and governance, Earthscan studies in water resource management. Routledge, London
Gunderson L (2000) Ecological resilience—in theory and application. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:425–439. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
Huitema D, Mostert E, Egas W, Moellenkamp S, Pahl-Wostl C, Yalcin R (2009) Adaptive water governance: assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-)management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecol Soc 14(1):26. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art26/. Accessed 27 July 2017
Juergensmeyer JC, Roberts TE (2013) Land use planning and development regulation law, 3rd edn. West, St. Paul
Kingdon J (1995) Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, 2nd edn. Harper Collins, New York
Krebs VJ, Holley J (2004) Building sustainable communities through network development. The Nonprofit Q 11:46–53. https://nonprofitquarterly.org/2004/03/21/building-sustainable-communities-through-social-network-development/. Accessed 27 July 2017
Lee M (2003) Conceptualizing the new governance: a new institution of social coordination. Paper presented at the institutional analysis development mini-conference, workshop in political theory and policy analysis. Indiana University, Bloomington, 3–5 May 2003. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/71ec/0b861a6dad2d93b56ab5f8c6b77bfa415a44.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2017
Lockwood M, Davidson J, Curtis A, Stratford E, Griffith R (2010) Governance principles for natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 23:986–1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920802178214
Marshall G (2008) Nesting, subsidiarity, and community-based environmental governance beyond the local scale. Int J Commons 2(1):75–97
Martin P, Kennedy A (2016) Intra-national rivalries: a submerged aspect of trans-boundary water governance. In: Gray J, Holley C, Rayfuse R (eds) Trans-jurisdictional water law and governance, Earthscan studies in water resource management. Routledge, London
McGinnis MD (ed) (1999) Polycentric governance and development: readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
Mitchell B (2014) Evolving regional, integrated and engagement approaches for natural resources management in South Australia. Flinders University, Adelaide. http://www.goyderinstitute.org/uploads/documents/publications/2014/Bruce%20Mitchell-WEB.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2017
National Civic League (2013) Making public participation legal. http://ncdd.org/rc/wp-content/uploads/MakingP2Legal.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2017
Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004) Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environ Manag 34:75–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7
Olsson P, Gunderson LH, Carpenter SR, Ryan P, Lebel L, Folke C, Holling CS (2006) Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11(1):18. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art18/. Accessed 27 July 2017
Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ostrom V (1999) Polycentricity. (Parts 1 and 2). In: McGinnis MD (ed) Polycentricity and local public economies. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
Ostrom V, Tiebout CM, Warren R (1961) The organization of government in metropolitan areas: a theoretical inquiry. Am Polit Sci Rev 55:831–842
Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Chang 19:354–365
Raadgever GT, Mostert E, Kranz N, Interwies E, Timmerman JG (2008) Assessing management regimes in transboundary river basins: do they support adaptive management? Ecol Soc 13(1):14. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art14/. Accessed 27 July 2017
Richards EP (2007) Public health law as administrative law: example lessons. J Health Care Law Policy 10:61–88
Robison J, Cosens B, Jackson S, Leonard K, McCool D (2018) Indigenous water justice. Lewis and Clark Law Review in press.
Rogers P, Hall A (2003) Effective water governance. In: Global water partnership technical committee (TEC) Background Paper 7. Global Water Partnership, Stockholm. http://www.gwp.org/Global/ToolBox/Publications/Background%20papers/07%20Effective%20Water%20Governance%20%282003%29%20English.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2017
Ruhl JB (2016) Seeing past the zero sum game in environmental policy—harder than it looks. In: Environmental law prof blog, ELC essay no. 2. http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/environmental_law/2016/12/elc-essay-2-the-zen-of-nonzerosumness-in-environmental-policy-easier-to-say-than-to-achieve.html. Accessed 27 July 2017
Stewart R (2003) Administrative law in the twenty-first century. New York University Law Rev 78:437–460
Thompson BH (2016) Defragging: overcoming fragmentation in United States water governance. In: Gray J, Holley C, Rayfuse R (eds) Trans-jurisdictional water law and governance, Earthscan studies in water resource management. Routledge, London
Tyler TR (2006) Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimization. Ann Rev Psychol 57:375–400
United Nations (1992) Agenda 21. United Nations conference on environment & development, Rio de Janerio, 3–14 June 1992. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2017
United Nations World Water Assessment Program (UN WWAP) (2003) Water for people, water for life: UN world water development report 1. UNESCO, Paris. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/water/wwap/wwdr/wwdr1-2003/. Accessed 27 July 2017
UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda: Governance and Development (2012) Url: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/Think%20Pieces/7_governance.pdf
Legal References
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010)
16 U.S.C. §§ 1531–1544 US Endangered Species Act
42 U.S.C. §§ 4321–4370h US National Environmental Policy Act
Acknowledgments
This work was developed in part under the Adaptive Water Governance Project, funded by the US National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) under funding from the US National Science Foundation, NSF DBI-1052875. The views set forth by contributors to this volume represent their own and do not represent the views of any public or private entity the contributor is affiliated with.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cosens, B. et al. (2018). Legal Pathways to Adaptive Governance in Water Basins in North America and Australia. In: Cosens, B., Gunderson, L. (eds) Practical Panarchy for Adaptive Water Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72472-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72472-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72470-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72472-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)