Skip to main content

Automated Reasoning for Knot Semigroups and \(\pi \)-orbifold Groups of Knots

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10693))

Abstract

The paper continues the first author’s research which shows that automatic reasoning is an effective tool for establishing properties of algebraic constructions associated with knot diagrams. Previous research considered involutory quandles (also known as keis) and quandles. This paper applies automated reasoning to knot semigroups, recently introduced and studied by the second author, and \(\pi \)-orbifold groups of knots. We test two conjectures concerning knot semigroups (specifically, conjectures aiming to describe knot semigroups of diagrams of the trivial knot and knot semigroups of 4-plat knot diagrams) on a large number of examples. These experiments enable us to formulate one new conjecture. We discuss applications of our results to a classical problem of the knot theory, determining whether a knot diagram represents the trivial knot.

Alexei Lisitsa—Part of this research was carried out during visits by the first named author to the Department of Mathematical Sciences at the University of Essex in 2016. The visits were financed by a London Mathematical Society Scheme 7 Grant (ref. SC7-1516-12). This research has been supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. H2020-FETOPEN-2015-CSA 712689 (SC \(^2\)).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We have chosen Prover9 and model builder Mace4 (below), primarily to be able to compare efficiency of automated reasoning with semigroups with that for involutory quandles in [6], where the same systems were used. Otherwise the choice is not very essential and any other automated first order (dis)provers could be used instead.

  2. 2.

    Fatal Error: mace4: domain_element too big.

  3. 3.

    The described procedure is a version of so-called Fox coloring [17]. Note that in general, labels of some distinct arcs may coincide.

  4. 4.

    We are grateful to José Montesinos (Universidad Complutense de Madrid), Genevieve Walsh (Tufts University) and Vanni Noferini (University of Essex) for attracting our attention to this result.

  5. 5.

    Note that here we mean the usual semigroup deduction, not a more complicated one used in cancellative semigroups. It is useful to remind oneself of this, because knot semigroups are defined using a cancellative presentation, and it makes proving equalities of words in knot semigroups more involved.

  6. 6.

    https://zenodo.org/record/1009577, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1009577.

References

  1. Birkhoff, G.: On the structure of abstract algebras. In: Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 31, pp. 433–454. Cambridge University Press (1935)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boileau, M., Zimmermann, B.: The \(\pi \)-orbifold group of a link. Mathematische Zeitschrift 200(2), 187–208 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Burde, G., Heusener, M., Zieschang, H.: Knots. De Gruyter, Berlin (2013)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Caferra, R., Leitsch, A., Peltier, N.: Automated Model Building, vol. 31. Springer, Dordrecht (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2653-9

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Elhamdadi, M., Nelson, S.: Quandles, vol. 74. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Fish, A., Lisitsa, A.: Detecting unknots via equational reasoning, I: exploration. In: Watt, S.M., Davenport, J.H., Sexton, A.P., Sojka, P., Urban, J. (eds.) CICM 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8543, pp. 76–91. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08434-3_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Fish, A., Lisitsa, A., Stanovský, D.: A combinatorial approach to knot recognition. In: Horne, R. (ed.) EGC 2015. CCIS, vol. 514, pp. 64–78. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25043-4_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Fox, R.: A quick trip through knot theory. In: Fort, M.K. (ed.) Topology of Three-Manifolds. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gilbert, N.D., Porter, T.: Knots and Surfaces. Oxford University Press, New York (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Huet, G., Oppen, D.C.: Equations and rewrite rules. In: Book, R.N. (ed.) Formal Language Theory: Perspectives and Open Problems, pp. 349–405. Academic Press, New York (1980)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Joyce, D.: A classifying invariant of knots, the knot quandle. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 23(1), 37–65 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kauffman, L.H., Henrich, A.: Unknotting unknots. https://arxiv.org/abs/1006.4176

  13. Kauffman, L.H., Lambropoulou, S.: Hard unknots and collapsing tangles. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0601525v5

  14. Kawauchi, A.: A Survey of Knot Theory. Birkhäuser, Basel (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Lackenby, M.: Upper bound on Reidemeister moves. Ann. Math. 182, 1–74 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Raymond-Lickorish, W.B.: An Introduction to Knot Theory, vol. 175. Springer, New York (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0691-0

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Livingston, C.: Knot Theory, vol. 24. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Manturov, V.: Knot Theory. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. McCune, W.: Prover9 and Mace4 (2005–2010). http://www.cs.unm.edu/mccune/prover9/

  20. Morgan, J.W., Bass, H. (eds.): The Smith Conjecture. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Murasugi, K.: Knot Theory and Its Applications. Springer, Boston (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4719-3_15

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Ochiai, M.: Non-trivial projections of the trivial knot. http://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/dspace/handle/2433/99940

  23. O’Hara, J.: Energy of knots and infinitesimal cross ratio. Geom. Topol. Monogr. 13, 421–445 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Unknot. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unknot

  25. Vernitski, A.: Describing semigroups with defining relations of the form xy = yz and yx = zy and connections with knot theory. Semigroup Forum 95(1), 66–82 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Winker, S.K.: Quandles, knot invariants, and the n-fold branched cover. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Chicago (1984)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alexei Lisitsa or Alexei Vernitski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lisitsa, A., Vernitski, A. (2017). Automated Reasoning for Knot Semigroups and \(\pi \)-orbifold Groups of Knots. In: Blömer, J., Kotsireas, I., Kutsia, T., Simos, D. (eds) Mathematical Aspects of Computer and Information Sciences. MACIS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10693. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72453-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72453-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72452-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72453-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics