Abstract
This chapter provides a number of building blocks—concepts and theories—required to undertake the assessment of finance and credit schemes in Chaps. 3 through 6. The chapter presents evidence for financialization and theories that explain it, landing on everyday financialization as an effective building block to understand finance and credit schemes for vulnerable people. Everyday financialization argues that financialization is bringing finance to more and more people including vulnerable people and this may, in part, substitute for state-based entitlements and thus presents risks to human well-being. This chapter also examines state-based efforts to foster financial inclusion and examines the similarities and differences it (financial inclusion) has with financialization. Importantly this chapter presents the capabilities approach in order to make assessments about finance and credit schemes. Finally, this chapter presents the reader with a brief history of money, banking, and human development focusing on the period since the 1950s.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
There have been several other financial crises that involve southern or emerging economies since the 1980s including Asia (1997), Russia (1998), and Argentina (1998).
- 2.
Financialization is related to but distinct from the expansion of markets and trade, sometimes referred to as commodification. Commodification involves linking producers directly with consumers through markets. Commodification transforms goods and services that may have been used by the producer to meet his or her own needs. Instead of consuming the goods that one produces one sells (a portion) of these goods and purchases (a portion) of the goods that one needs for household consumption. As commodification proceeds, the role of finances and financial services will expand through the expanded use of cash, credit, savings, and investments by traders, hawkers, retailers, and consumers.
- 3.
Sandel argues that excessive emphasis on markets is objected to on two general grounds: fairness and corruption (2012, pp. 110–13). The fairness objection highlights the limitations of the market under conditions of inequality or crisis. A person who is chronically poor or acutely struggling because of a natural hazard event might sell his/her land for a deflated price or possibly sell a body part. Inequality in outcomes leads the poor person to a further impoverished state. Not so for the non-poor person who can draw on assets such as insurance. The corruption objection relates to how the good in question is degraded by assigning a price. Allowing people to purchase admission to university, as opposed to meriting it through their academic achievement, is an example of degradation, in this case of the university and its staff. Sandel argues that expanding money incentives crowds out non-market incentives. The example he provides is of a Swiss village that voted on whether to accept a proposal that a nuclear waste facility be set up there. Initially the plebiscite was based purely on the notion of civic duty and 51% supported the arrangement. They added monetary compensation to each villager and this led to a decline in support to 25% (p. 115). The motivations were not additive but, in fact, were subtractive. Adding a financial incentive undermined the civic motivation and lessoned the local support for the nuclear waste facility. Adding an avenue whereby wealthy people can “buy” admission to university would lead to a similar effect on prospective and current students (and staff). The knowledge that one can pay their way in erodes that status, if not the content, of the institution turning some people off university or toward another university. He argues that the erosion effect outweighs the price effect (p. 119). Sandel points out that excessive commercialization changes the nature of the good. When land is given voluntarily by the Swiss community for nuclear waste storage it involves a civic contribution but when money is involved then financial payment gets conflated with civic duty. Moreover, Sandel argues that ethical behavior is not a scarce resource as Arrow and others argue but, in fact, can be an expanding good as one ethical act can lead, through ripples, to a series of other ethical acts, without diminishing the total pie or remaining ethical acts (pp. 126–27). Economists might assume that money can “sweeten the pot” and Sandel might argue the reverse that it corrupts the pot. Arguably context matters so that in some cases money might be additive and in other cases it might be subtractive. For instance, can money enable someone to overcome a barrier and then, once dieting/not-smoking/sending the kids to school, realizes the benefits and becomes motivated. Moreover, Sandel seems to assume that there are no other, and conflicting, monetary influences. Is that true? What about the media that obsesses about food and, in the past at least, romanticized cigarette smoking? Can a monetary incentive to diet (or to quit smoking) counter these pressures? The question of social virtue has been examined quite extensively in the social capital literature (Putnam 1993; Woolcock and Narayan 2003). One interesting conclusion of this literature is that social virtue is often path dependent, in that strong virtues today are the basis for strong virtues in the future.
- 4.
- 5.
There are many other interesting indicators of financialization. For instance, Ferguson argues that business schools are growing as more undergraduates anticipate getting a job in a bank: in 1970, 5% of graduates went into finances, whereas this increased to 15% by 1990, and 20 of male graduates in 2007 expected their first jobs to be in banks (Ferguson 2008, p. 5).
- 6.
- 7.
For instance, while India’s textile sector was beginning to rebound, it produced cotton and exported it to Britain that used it to produce textiles that were in part exported to India. This period also witnessed initiatives—for instance, France’s Animation Rurale in West Africa and Rabindranath Tagore’s Sriniketan—on the part of the colonial state and civil society directly targeting social improvement, and so this period included the roots of development efforts that became ubiquitous in the post-colonial period.
- 8.
For instance, an early debate played a “balanced” approach to economic development that sought to grow a wide range of sectors to an “unbalanced” approach that identified leading sectors that dynamically pull the entire economy forward.
- 9.
In its formative years in the post-colonial period, starting in the post–World War II period, the study of development was deeply influenced by economic theory. Sociology made substantial contributions during this time, but these were less policy related. Anthropology’s contribution has more recently been critiqued for its focus on understanding diverse local people for the purpose of drawing them into and being controlled by the colonial and then the modern state system. Both economic theory generally and the subdiscipline of development economics were quite different from economic theory today. The discipline was more diverse, and much economic thinking theorized a much larger role for the state in the economy. The neoclassical school in economics was evident but not as dominant as it is today. It co-existed with Keynesian economics , and Keynesian economics dominated macroeconomics. The neoclassical school co-existed with even more interventionist economic theories such as Marxist theory. While Marxist theory was not considered a part of the canon or economic orthodoxy it certainly influenced economic thought at the time. Development economics, as compared to economic theory, was even broader in its approach in that it encompassed neoclassical economics and spanned Marxist and dependency theories of economic development and underdevelopment. While theoretically diverse compared to development economic thinking today, the role of finances were, as in general economic theory, not central.
- 10.
For instance, in a popular textbook of the period written by Canadian Benjamin Higgins (1968, 1959), Economic Development, there are no chapters or subchapters on the topic and in fact “banking” and “finances” do not even appear in the index. The book spends about one-half of its volume on grand theories of economic development and another one-third on policies, with the remaining material on case studies.
- 11.
This includes Marxists, who saw class conflict as the principal cause of poverty and its resolution through revolution as the principal means of development; dependency theorists, who saw North–South exploitation as the root of global poverty and disengaging from the North the ticket to Southern development; and liberal—as distinct from neoliberal—theorists, who saw the state the key actor in reforming the market for the common rather than private good.
- 12.
One common foreign capital debate at this time dealt with examining the role and impact of multinational corporations (MNCs) on the Global South. Proponents noted the benefits associated with MNCs including capital and technology inflows, while opponents noted the limitations such as the lack of linkages into the broader economy.
Bibliography
Aitken, Rob. 2007. Performing Capital. 1st ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
“The Economist Explains: Why China is Creating a New “World Bank” for Asia | The Economist”. 2015. Accessed April 27, 2015. http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2014/11/economist-explains-6
Bateman, Milford. 2010. Why Doesn’t Microfinance Work?: The Destructive Rise of Local Neoliberalism. New York: Zed Books.
———. 2011. Confronting Microfinance: Undermining Sustainable Development. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.
———. 2015. South Africa’s Post-Apartheid Microcredit Experiment: Moving from State-Enforced to Market-Enforced Exploitation. Forum for Social Economics: 1–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2015.1056202
Boyer, Robert. 2005. From Shareholder Value to CEO Power: The Paradox of the 1990s. Competition and Change 9 (1): 7–47. https://doi.org/10.1179/102452905X38623. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/maney/com/2005/00000009/00000001/art00002.
Buckland, Jerry. 1996. The Distributional Impact of Income-Generation Programmes in Bangladesh. Canadian Journal of Development Studies 17 (3): 385–404.
———. 2012. Hard Choices: Financial Exclusion, Fringe Banks, and Poverty in Urban Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Caplovitz, David. 1967. The Poor Pay More: Consumer Practices of Low-Income Families. New York: The Free Press.
Epstein, Gerald A., ed. 2005. Financialization and the World Economy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Ferguson, Niall. 2008. The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World. New York: Penguin.
Goulet, Denis. 1995. Development Ethics. 1st Publ. ed. New York: Apex Press.
Graeber, David. 2014. Debt: The First 5,000 Years. New York: Melville House Publishing.
Higgins, Benjamin. 1968 [1959]. Economic Development: Principles, Problems, and Policies. New York: WW Norton Inc.
Hudson, David. 2015. Global Finance and Development. 1st Publ. ed. London: Routledge.
Kelly, Sonja E., and Elisabeth Rhyne. 2015. By the Numbers: Benchmarking Progress Toward Financial Inclusion. Washington, DC: Center for Financial Inclusion.
Krippner, Greta R. 2005. The Financialization of the American Economy. Socio-Economic Review 3 (2): 173–208.
Kroll, Christian. 2015. Global Development and Happiness: How can Data on Subjective Well-being Inform Development Theory and Practice? Oxford Development Studies 43 (3, Sep.): 281–309.
Kus, Basak. 2012. Financialisation and Income Inequality in OECD Nations: 1995–2007. Economic and Social Review 43 (4, Winter): 477–495.
Lapavitsas, Costas. 2009. Financialised Capitalism: Crisis and Financial Expropriation. Historical Materialism 17 (2): 114–148. https://doi.org/10.1163/156920609X436153. http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/156920609x436153.
———. 2013. Profiting Without Producing: How Finance Exploits Us All. London: Verso.
Lapavitsas, Costas, and Jeff Powell. 2013. Financialisation Varied: A Comparative Analysis of Advanced Economies. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 6 (3): 359–379.
Montgomerie, Johnna. 2006. The Financialization of the American Credit Card Industry. Competition and Change 10 (3): 301–319.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Parthasarathi, Prasannan. 1997. Religion and Consumption. United Nations Development Report.
Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Roodman, David, and Jonathan Morduch. 2014. The Impact of Microcredit on the Poor in Bangladesh: Revisiting the Evidence. Journal of Development Studies 50 (4, Apr.): 583–604.
Roy, Ananya. 2010. Poverty Capital. 1st Publ. ed., 1st ed. New York: Routledge.
Sandel, Michael J. 2012. What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf Inc.
Siklos, Pierre L. 2004. Money, Banking, and Financial Institution: Canada and the Global Environment. 4th ed. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
Soros, George. 2009. The Crash of 2008 and What It Means: The New Paradigm for Financial Markets. New York: Public Affairs.
Stockhammer, Engelbert. 2012. Financialization, Income Distribution and the Crisis. Investigacion Economica 71 (279, Jan.): 39–70.
United Nations Development Program. 1998. Human Development Report 1998. New York: UNDP.
———. 2015. Human Development Report. New York: UNDP.
Van Arnum, Bradford M., and Michele I. Naples. 2013. Financialization and Income Inequality in the United States, 1967–2010. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 72 (5, Nov.): 1158–1182.
van der Zwan, Natascha. 2014. Making Sense of Financialization. Socio-Economic Review 12 (1): 99–129.
Villasenor, John, and Darrell West. 2015. The 2015 Brookings Financial and Digital Inclusion Project Report. Brookings Institution Reports. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1787813332
Woolcock, Michael, and Deepa Narayan. 2003. Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research and Policy. In Elgar Reference Collection. Critical Studies in Economic Institutions, ed. Elinor Ostrom and T.K. Ahn, vol. 2, 416–440. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Elgar; Distributed by American International Distribution Corporation, Williston, VT.
World Bank. 2014. Global Financial Development Report 2014: Financial Inclusion. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
Zelizer, Viviana A. 2011. Economic Lives: How Culture Shapes the Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Buckland, J. (2018). Financial Inclusion and Building Financial Resilience. In: Building Financial Resilience. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72419-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72419-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72418-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72419-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)