Abstract
This study is designed as a qualitative research in order to examine (i) how the Mathematics Village promotes mathematical creativity and (ii) the transformation of Mathematics Village from a non-virtual environment to Social Media, which is a virtual environment. Our data collection tools include individual interviews with two mathematicians, who teach at the Mathematics Village as well as focus group interviews with seven high school, undergraduate, and graduate students and classroom observations. We have analyzed the collected data via content analysis. The findings of this study reveal that the Mathematics Village promotes mathematical creativity of students and enables mathematicians to activate their own creativity. From that perspective, having an educational setting that provides freedom can positively affect students’ state of mind and creativity. Therefore, it is of importance to transfer basic characteristics of a non-virtual environment (Mathematics Village) into a virtual environment (Social Media), which brings people together with the aim of doing mathematics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Alladi, K., & Rino Nesin, G. A. (2015). The Nesin Mathematics Village in Turkey. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 62(6), 652–658. https://doi.org/10.1090/noti1258.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York, NY: Springer.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123–167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. New York, NY: Westview Press.
Ayık, G., Ayık, H., Bugay, L., & Kelekci, O. (2013). Generating sets of finite singular transformation semigroups. Semigroup Forum, 86(1), 59–66.
Baya’a, N., & Daher, W. (2013). Facebook as an educational environment for mathematics learning. In G. Mallia (Ed.), The social classroom: Integrating social network use in education (pp. 171–191). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Cropley, A. J. (2001). Creativity in education and learning: A guide for teachers and educators. London, UK: Kogan Page.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–338). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002.
Dabbagh, N., & Reo, R. (2011). Back to the future: Tracing the roots and learning affordances of social software. In M. J. W. Lee & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0-based e-learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching (pp. 1–20). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Fleith, S. D. (2000). Teacher and student perceptions of creativity in the classroom environment. Roeper Review, 22(3), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554022.
Göral, H., & Sertbaş, D. C. (2017). Almost all hyperharmonic numbers are not integers. Journal of Number Theory, 171, 495–526.
Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., et al. (2009). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Levenson, E. (2011). Exploring collective mathematical creativity in elementary school. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 45(3), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01428.x.
Lu, J., Hao, Q., & Jing, M. (2016). Consuming, sharing, and creating content: How young students use new social media in and outside school. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.019.
Mann, E. L. (2006). Creativity: The essence of mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(2), 236–262. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2006-264.
McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2011). Pedagogy 2.0: Critical challenges and responses to web 2.0 and social software in tertiary teaching. In M. J. W. Lee & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0-based e-learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching (pp. 43–69). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Meusburger, P. (2009). Milieus of creativity: The roles of places, environments, and spatial contexts. In P. Meusburger, J. Funke, & E. Wunder (Eds.), Milieus of creativity: An interdisciplinary approach to spatiality of creativity (pp. 97–153). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Nesin, A. (2008). Matematik ve develerle eşekler [Mathematics with camels and donkeys] Istanbul, Turkey: Nesin Yayınevi.
Nesin Mathematics Village. (2017). Nesin Mathematics Village from http://nesinkoyleri.org/eng/. Accessed January 15, 2017.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation options. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pehkonen, E. (1997). The state-of-art in mathematical creativity. International Journal on Mathematical Education, 29(3), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-997-0001-z.
Peppler, K. (2013). Social media and creativity. In D. Lemish (Ed.), International handbook of children, adolescents, and media (pp. 193–200). New York, NY: Routledge.
Peppler, K. A., & Solomou, M. (2011). Building creativity: Collaborative learning and creativity in social media environments. On the Horizon, 19(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748121111107672.
Personalize Learning. (2017). Schools Without Classroom. Retrieved from http://www.personalizelearning.com/2014/06/schools-without-classrooms.html.
Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96.
Sriraman, B. (2004). The characteristics of mathematical creativity. The Mathematics Educator, 14(1), 19–34.
Zaman, M., Ananda rajan, M., & Dai, Q. (2010). Experiencing flow with instant messaging and its facilitating role on creative behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1009–1018.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr. Ali Nesin and Dr. Özlem Beyarslan for their contributions to the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Emre-Akdoğan, E., Yazgan-Sağ, G. (2018). Ancient School Without Walls: Collective Creativity in the Mathematics Village. In: Freiman, V., Tassell, J. (eds) Creativity and Technology in Mathematics Education. Mathematics Education in the Digital Era, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72381-5_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72381-5_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72379-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72381-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)