Advertisement

Semi-active Control

  • André Preumont
Chapter
Part of the Solid Mechanics and Its Applications book series (SMIA, volume 246)

Abstract

This chapter begins with a short discussion of the concept of semi-active control (passive devices with variable properties which can be changed with little energy). Next, the magneto-rheological (MR) fluids are described, and their modelling is briefly discussed (the simple Bingham model is sufficient in many applications); the operating modes (valve, shear, pinch modes) are described. It is followed by a discussion of various MR devices: MR shock absorber, MR brake, MR engine mount. Next, a quarter-car semi-active suspension model is analyzed and it is shown how the so-called “semi-active sky-hook” is prone to chatter, exciting higher frequencies.

Keywords

Semi-active control Magneto-rheological fluid (MR) Electro-rheological fluid (ER) Shock absorber MR brake Engine mount Bingham model 

References

  1. 1.
    Avraam MT (2009) MR-fluid brake design and its application to a portable muscular rehabilitation device. Ph.D. thesis, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Active Structures LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carlson JD (2007) Semi-active vibration suppression. CISM course Semi-active vibration suppression - the best of active and passive technologies, Udine, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carlson JD, Jolly MR (2000) MR fluid, foam elastomer devices. Mechatronics 10:555–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carlson JD, Sproston JL (2000) Controllable fluids in 2000 - status of ER and MR fluid technology. In: Proceedings of Actuator 2000, Bremen, Germany, pp 126–130Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Collette C, Preumont A (2010) High frequency energy transfer in semi-active suspension. J Sound Vib 329:4604–4616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coulter JP, Weiss KD, Carlson JD (1993) Engineering applications of electrorheological materials. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 4:248–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gaul L, Nitsche R (1999) Friction control for vibration suppression (DETC99/VIB-8191) movic symposium. ASME design engineering technical conferences, Las VegasGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karnopp D (1990) Design principles for vibration control systems using semi-active dampers. Trans ASME J Dyn Syst Meas Control 112:448–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karnopp D, Crosby M, Harwood RA (1974) Vibration control using semi- active suspension control. J Eng Ind 96:619–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Preumont A, Seto K (2008) Active control of structures. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sims ND, Stanway R, Johnson AR (1999) Vibration control using SMART fluids: a state of the art review. Shock Vib Dig 31(3):195–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spencer BF, Dyke SJ, Sain MK, Carlson JD (1997) Phenomenological model of a magnetorheological damper. ASCE J Eng Mech 123(3):230–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Venhovens PJ (1994) The development and implementation of adaptive semi-active suspension control. Veh Syst Dyn 23:211–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Active Structures LaboratoryUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations