The Euro and European Monetary Policy: A Critical View

  • Cristian Paun
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)


The fiat money production and European Union’s monetary integration is considered to be a big leap in the integration process. The introduction of Euro and the centralization of fiat-money production by European Central Bank was considered to generate many benefits for Single Market, European citizens or business sector. Monetary integration and accession to Euro was linked to specific nominal convergence criteria and became compulsory for any new member. The history of Euro creation and adoption by majority of EU countries was not an easy one. The evolution of the Euro Zone after the introduction of a single currency was not merely positive. The introduction of the Euro was followed later by a significant enlargement, including Eastern European Countries (EEC), thus creating a European Union with “different speeds”. The current bailouts of various banks exposed to the Greek or the Cyprus crisis and the constant quantitative easing that significantly expanded the existing broad money (denominated in Euro) emphasize the fiat money features of this currency and the tragedy of commons surrounding this important project for European Union.


Euro Fiat money Monetary policy Central banks Optimal currency area 


  1. Allard C (ed) (2013) Toward a Fiscal Union for the Euro Area. IMF Staff Discussion Note. Link:
  2. Baggus P (2010) The tragedy of the Euro. L. v. Mises Institute, Auburn, AlabamaGoogle Scholar
  3. Burgert M, Roeger W (2014) Fiscal devaluation: efficiency and equity. European Commission, Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs. Economic Papers Nr. 542Google Scholar
  4. Cini M, Borragan NP-S (2016) European Union Politics, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Corsetti G, Dedola L, Jarocinski M, Mackowiak B, Schmitd S (2016) Macroeconomic stabilization, monetary-fiscal interactions, and Europe’s monetary union. European Central Bank Working Paper Series, Discussion Paper Nr. 1988Google Scholar
  6. de Haan J, Oosterloo S, Schoenmaker D (2015) Financial markets and institutions: a European perspective, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Delivorias A (2015) A history of monetary integration. European Parliament Research Services. Study number: EN. PE 551.325Google Scholar
  8. Feenstra RC, Taylor AM (2016) International macroeconomics, 4th edn. Worth Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Frankel JA (2004) Real convergence and Euro adoption in Central and Eastern Europe: trade and business cycle correlations as endogenous criteria for joining EMU. KSG Working Paper No. RWP04-039. Available at SSRN:
  10. Friedman M (1948) A monetary and fiscal framework for economic stability. Am Econ Rev 38(June):245–264Google Scholar
  11. Friedman M (1968) The role of monetary policy. Am Econ Rev 58(March):1–17Google Scholar
  12. Galor O (1996) Convergence? Inference from theoretical models. Econ J 106:1056–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glavan B (2004) The failure of OCA analysis. Q J Austrian Econ 7(2):29–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hulsmann G (2008) The ethics of money production. L. v. Mises Institute, Auburn, AlabamaGoogle Scholar
  15. Issing O (ed) (2003) Background studies for the ECB’s evaluation of its monetary policy strategy. European Central Bank, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  16. Kollmann R, Roeger W, Veld J (2012) Fiscal policy in a financial crisis: standard policy vs. bank rescue measures. ECARES Working Paper Series, 2012-008Google Scholar
  17. Marelli E, Signorelli M (2010) Institutional, nominal and real convergence in Europe. Banks Bank Syst 5(2):142Google Scholar
  18. McCormick J (2015) European union politics, 2nd edn. PalgraveGoogle Scholar
  19. McKinnon R (1963) Optimum currency areas. Am Econ Rev 53:207–222Google Scholar
  20. Mises van L (1998) Human action. Scholarly edn. The Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, AlabamaGoogle Scholar
  21. Montoro C, Takats E, Yetman J (2012) Is monetary policy constrained by fiscal policy? BIS Papers chapters. In: Bank for International Settlements (ed), Fiscal policy, public debt and monetary policy in emerging market economies, vol 67. Bank for International Settlements, pp 11–30Google Scholar
  22. Mundell R (1961) A theory of optimal currency areas. Am Econ Rev 51:657–665Google Scholar
  23. Nelsen BF, Stubb A (2014) The European union: readings on the theory and practice of European integration, 4th edn. Lynne Rienner, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  24. Olsen J, McCormick J (2016) The European Union: politics and policies, 6th ed. Westview PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Rademacher I (2013) Tax competition in the Eurozone: capital mobility, agglomeration, and the small country disadvantage. MPIfG Discussion Paper 13/13. Max Planck Institute for the Study of SocietiesGoogle Scholar
  26. Rothbard M (2009) Man, economy and state: a treatise on economic principles. Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, AlabamaGoogle Scholar
  27. Sargent T, Wallace N (1981) Some unpleasant monetarist arithmetic. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 5(3):1–17Google Scholar
  28. Scheller K (2004) The European Central Bank – History, role and functions. European Central Bank, Frankfurt am Main, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  29. Solow R (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q J Econ 70(1):65–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Young A, Higgins JM, Levy D (2008) Sigma convergence versus beta convergence: evidence from U.S. county-level data. J Money Credit Bank 40(5):1083–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zumaquero AM (2010) International macroeconomics: recent developments. Nova Science, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Websites and Official Documents and Reports

  1. Communauté économique européenne – Commission (1962) Mémorandum de la Commission sur le programme d’action de la Communauté pendant la deuxième étape. Bruxelles: Service des publications des Communautés européennes, 1962. Nr. 107: 86–93 (Marjolin Memorandum)Google Scholar
  2. European Commission (2016) Taxation trends in the European Union. Directorate for Taxation and Customs UnionGoogle Scholar
  3. European Commission (1987) Single European Act. Official Journal of the European Communities (OJEC), L 169. (Single European Act)Google Scholar
  4. European Commission (1989) The report on economic and monetary union in the European Community, Permanent Link: Retrieved from May 2017 (Delors Report on EMU)
  5. European Commission (2008) On the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank. Official Journal of the European Union, C 115/9.5.2008Google Scholar
  6. European Commission (2012) Treaty on the functioning of the European Union, 2012/C 326/01 209Google Scholar
  7. European Commission. The benefits of the Euro. Link: Retrieved from May 2017
  8. European Economic Community (1970) Report on the realisation by stages of economic and monetary union. Bulletin of the European Communities. 1970, Supplement 11/70. Brussels: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (Werner Report)Google Scholar
  9. European Yearbook (1955, 1957) Council of Europe, Editor Martinus Nijhoff PublishersGoogle Scholar
  10. The Schuman Declaration – 9 May 1950. Internet Source: Accessed on May 2017
  11. Transparency International EU (2017) Two sides of the same coin: independence and accountability of the European Central Bank. Transparency International EUGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Bucharest University of Economic StudiesBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations