European Cohesion Policy

  • Gabriela Carmen Pascariu
  • Cristian Incaltarau
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)


The European Cohesion Policy is the largest and most complex policy of the European Union. As it is a policy focused on reducing the intra-EU gaps in development, the Cohesion Policy is particularly relevant for less developed economies and regions, where it has a key contribution to stimulating economic competitiveness and accelerating growth, boosting and spreading the positive effects of the internal market. In this chapter we aim to introduce a theoretical foundation for public interventions on cohesion in the process of European integration, as well as to explain the system of Cohesion Policy coordination, regulation and implementation, to present critically its impact on the European economy and explain the way in which Structural and Investments Funds contribute to and may be used for business sector development in the European Union.


Cohesion policy Regional development European structural and investment funds (ESIF) Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) 


  1. Acemoglu D, Johnson SH, Robinson J (2006) De Facto political power and institutional persistence. Am Econ Rev 96(2):325–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiginger K (2013) A new strategy for the European periphery. Policy Paper 1.
  3. Allen D (2010) Structural funds and cohesion policy. In: Wallace M, Pollack A, Young AR (eds) Policy making in European Union. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 193–214Google Scholar
  4. Barro RJ, Sala-i-Martin X (2004) Economic growth, 2nd edn. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker SO, Egger P, von Ehrlich M (2012) Too much of a good thing? On the growth effects of the EU’s regional policy. Eur Econ Rev 56(4):648–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker SO, Egger PH, von Ehrlich M (2013) Absorptive capacity and the growth and investment effects of regional transfers: a regression discontinuity design with heterogeneous treatment effects. Am Econ J Econ Pol 5(4):29–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Begg I (2016) The economic theory of Cohesion policy. In: Piattoni S, Polverari L (eds) Handbook on cohesion policy in the EU. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 50–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boldrin M, Canova F (2001) Inequality and convergence in Europe’s regions: reconsidering European regional policies. Econ Policy 16(32):207–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buzelay A (1996) Intégration et Désintegration européennes. Economica, ParisGoogle Scholar
  10. Constantin DL, Goschin Z, Dragan G (2011) Implications of EU structural assistance to new member states on regional disparities: the question of absorption capacity. In: Stimson R, Stough RR, Nijkamp P (eds) Endogenous regional growth. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 182–203Google Scholar
  11. Delgado M, Porter ME, Stern S (2014) Clusters, convergence, and economic performance. Res Policy 43(10):1785–1799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dragan G, Orban L, Pascariu G (2013) Politica de Coeziune a Uniunii Europene. Determinanti, mecanisme, instrumente [Cohesion Policy of the European Union. Determinants, mechanisms, tools]. Editura Universitara, BucharestGoogle Scholar
  13. Dupuch S, Jennequin H, Mouhoud EM (2004) EU enlargement: what does it change for the European economic geography? Revue de l’OFCE 91 bis (5):241–274Google Scholar
  14. Esposti R, Bussoletti S (2008) Impact of Objective 1 funds on regional growth convergence in the European Union: a panel-data approach. Reg Stud 42(2):159–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. European Commission (2010) Europe 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth Communication from the Commission COM (2010) 2020 final, 3 March 2010Google Scholar
  16. European Commission and European Investment Bank (2014) Ex-ante assessment methodology for financial instruments in the 2014-2020 programming period Enhancing the competitiveness of SME, including agriculture, microcredit and fisheries (Thematic objective 3), Volume III.
  17. European Commission, Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs (2014) Guidebook series how to support SME policy from structural funds. Supporting the Internationalisation of SMEs. Office for Official Publications of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  18. European Commission Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs (2016) SME recovery continues. SME performance review 2015/2016. Annual report on European SMEs 2015/2016.
  19. European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy (2014) Investment for jobs and growth. Promoting development and good governance in EU regions and cities. Sixth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Buxelles.
  20. European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy (2017a) Cohesion Policy Data portal.
  21. European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy(2017b) Projects Database.
  22. European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional Policy (2011) Cohesion Policy 2014-2020. Investing in growth and jobs. Publications Office of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  23. European Policies Research Center (EPRC) (2001) Economic and social cohesion in the economic policies of member States. Final report.
  24. European Union (1957) Rome Treaty, Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version), 25 Mar 1957Google Scholar
  25. European Union (1986/1987) Single European Act. O.J. (L 169) 1, 25 I.L.M. 506, 17 Feb 1986/1987Google Scholar
  26. European Union (2007) Treaty of Lisbon, Amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community. O.J. (C306) 1, 13 December 2007Google Scholar
  27. European Union (2008) EU Cohesion Policy 1988-2008: investing in Europe’s future. Inforegio, Panorama, no. 26/2008Google Scholar
  28. Eurostat Database (2017a) Purchasing power parities (PPPs), price level indices and real expenditures for ESA 2010 aggregates [prc_ppp_ind], Gross Domestic Product, Real expenditure per capita [prc_ppp_ind]Google Scholar
  29. Eurostat Database (2017b) Gross domestic product (GDP) at current market prices by NUTS 2 regions Purchasing power standard (PPS) per inhabitant [nama_10r_2gdp]Google Scholar
  30. Farole Th, Rodríguez-Pose A, Storper M (2009) Cohesion policy in the European Union: growth, geography, institutions. Report working paper of London School of Economics.
  31. Fratesi U, Perucca G (2014) Territorial capital and the effectiveness of cohesion policy: an assessment for CEE regions. Investigaciones Regionales 29:165–191Google Scholar
  32. Kaitila V (2004) Convergence of real GDP per capita in the EU15. How do the accession countries fit in? Working paper 25, European Network of Economic Policy Research InstitutesGoogle Scholar
  33. Le Gallo J, Dall’Erba S, Guillain R (2011) The local versus global dilemma of the effects of structural funds. Growth Chang 42(4):466–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mack R, Jacobson D (1996) The impact of peripherality upon trade patterns in the European Union. Eur Urban and Reg Stud 3-4:364–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Molle W (2001) The economics of European integration. Theory, practice, policy, 4th edn. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  36. Molle W (2007) European cohesion policy. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2000) Small and medium-sized enterprises: local strength, global reach. Policy Brief Series. June 2000.
  38. Pascariu GC, Frunză R (2011) Eastern versus Southern Peripherality in the EU: the study from the perspective of centre-periphery model. Transform Bus Econ 10(2B):590–611Google Scholar
  39. Petrakos G, Rodriguez-Pose A (2002) Regional inequalities in the EU. University of Thessaly Discussion Paper Series 8(5) 87–122Google Scholar
  40. Pienkowski J, Berkowitz P (2015) Econometric assessments of Cohesion Policy growth effects: How to make them more relevant for policy makers? Working Papers 02/2015.
  41. Porter ME (2003) The economic performance of regions. Reg Stud 37:549–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rodriguez-Pose A, Garcilazo E (2013) Quality of government and the returns of investment: examining the impact of cohesion expenditure in European regions. OECD regional development working papers 12. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. Rodríguez-Pose A, Garcilazo E (2015) Quality of government and the returns of investment: examining the impact of cohesion expenditure in European regions. Reg Stud 49(8):1274–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tomova M, Rezessy A, Lenkowski A, Maincent E (2013) European economy. EU governance and EU funds – testing the effectiveness of EU funds in a sound macroeconomic framework. Economic Papers No. 510. European Commission, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial AffairsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriela Carmen Pascariu
    • 1
  • Cristian Incaltarau
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Business AdministrationAlexandru Ioan Cuza University of IașiIașiRomania
  2. 2.Centre for European Studies Research Department, Faculty of LawAlexandru Ioan Cuza University of IașiIașiRomania

Personalised recommendations