Skip to main content

Introduction: Understanding European Complexity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Democracy in Europe

Part of the book series: The Theories, Concepts and Practices of Democracy ((PSTCD))

  • 528 Accesses

Abstract

It is true that the European integration crisis cannot simply be solved with a good theory, but we will not emerge from the current crisis without a clarification of what is at stake. We need to talk more about concepts than about mechanisms and leaders. New meanings, rather than financial or institutional engineering solutions, will lead us out of the crisis; it is less a matter of political will than a matter of understanding what is truly at stake. It is not a problem that can be solved through institutional procedures and leadership, but a crisis that must be well diagnosed, so that the basic concepts of democracy can be reconsidered in the context of that new and complex reality that is the European Union and in a globalized world where profound social and political changes are taking place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bickerton, Christopher. 2012. European Integration: From Nation-States to Member States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, James. 2007. Democracy Across Borders. From Demos to Demoi. Cambridge: MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, Tanja. 2010. European Governance: Negotiation and Competition in the Shadow of Hierarchy. Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (2): 191–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronk, Richard, and Wade Jacoby. 2013. Avoiding Monocultures in the European Union: The Case for the Mutual Recognition of Difference in Conditions of Uncertainty. LEQS Paper No. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheneval, Francis. 2011. The Government of Peoples: On the Idea and Principles of Multilateral Democracy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cheneval, Francis, and Frank Schimmelfennig. 2013. The Case for Demoi-cracy in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 51 (2): 334–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enzensberger, Hans Magnus. 2011. Sanftes Monster Brüssel oder Die Entmündigung Europas. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppler, Annegret, and Henrik Scheller, eds. 2013. Zur Konzeptionalisierung europäischer Desintegration. Zug- und Gegenkräfte im Europäischen Integrationsprozess. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, Erik O. 2000. Deliberative Supranationalism in the EU. In Democracy in the European Union–Integration Through Deliberation, ed. E.O. Eriksen and J.E. Fossum, 42–64. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabbrini, Sergio. 2010. Why the United States and Europe Are Becoming Similar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friese, Heidrun, and Peter Wagner. 2010. Survey Article: The Nascent Political Philosophy of the European Polity. Journal of Political Philosophy 10: 342–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart, Michael. 2007. Europe’s Deficits Through the Looking Glass: The European Union as a Challenge for Democracy. Perspectives on Politics 3: 567–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 2012. Zur Verfassung Europas. Ein Essay. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, Paul. 2000. Democracy and Governance. In Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy, ed. Jon Pierre. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innerarity, Daniel. 2012. The Future and Its Enemies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joerges, Christian. 2015. The Legitimacy Problématique of Economic Governance in the EU. In The Governance Report 2015, Hertie School of Governance, ed. Mark Dawson, Henrik Enderlein and Christian Joerges. 69–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joerges, Christian, and Jürgen Neyer. 1997. From Intergovernmental Bargaining to Deliberative Political Processes: The Constitutionalisation of Comitology. European Law Journal 3 (3): 274–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmis, Dimitrios. 2005. Theories of Federalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen, Hans. 1988. La Démocratie. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krisch, Nico. 2005. Europe’s Constitutional Monstrosity. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25 (2): 321–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, Piers. 2010. History Aplenty: But Still Too Isolated. In Agendas in EU Studies: Stalking the Elephant, ed. M. Egan, N. Nugent, and W.E. Paterson, 14–36. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Michelman, Frank. 1997. How Can the People Ever Make the Laws? A Critique of Deliberative Democracy. In Deliberative Democracy, ed. J. Bohman and W. Regh, 145–171. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravscik, Andrew. 2006. What Can We Learn from the Collapse of the European Constitutional Project? Politische Vierteljahresschrift 47 (2): 219–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Jan-Werner. 2003. A Dangerous Mind: Carl Schmitt in Post-war European Thought. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaïdis, Kalypso. 2004. The New Constitution as European “Demoi-cracy”. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7 (1): 76–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. The Idea of European Demoicracy. In Philosophical Foundations of European Law, ed. Julie Dickson and Pavlos Eleftheriadis, 247–274. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oakeshott, Michael. 1996. The Politics of Faith and the Politics of Scepticism. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Johan P. 2004. Unity, Diversity and Democratic Institutions: Lessons from the European Union. Journal of Political Philosophy 12: 461–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Unity and Diversity-European Style. Working Paper of the Arena. Center for European Studies, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2008. La légitimité démocratique: Impartialité, refl exivité, proximité. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Carl. 1926. Die geistesgeschichtliche Lage des heutigen Parlamentarismus. München and Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütze, Robert. 2009. From Dual to Cooperative Federalism. The Changing Structure of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, Alexis. 1994. Democracy in America. London: David Campbell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, Wolfgang. 2001. Jean Monnet – Mensch und Methode. Überschätz und überholt? IHS Vienna Political Sciences Series, No 74.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Innerarity, D. (2018). Introduction: Understanding European Complexity. In: Democracy in Europe. The Theories, Concepts and Practices of Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72197-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics