Skip to main content

Base Metal Microstructural Considerations for Anodizing Aluminum Substrates

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Metallurgy of Anodizing Aluminum
  • 1955 Accesses

Abstract

In order to show the intimate relationship between base metal microstructure and anodic oxide appearance and quality, this chapter discusses various possible design considerations in terms of the impact of different microstructures produced by different manufacturing processes on the appearance of anodic oxide. Differences in component microstructure that are governed by chemistry, composition, deformation and thermal history, are in turn, developed by anodizing. Small case studies, presented in the first section of the chapter, connect the design application to the appearance of the anodic oxide. Detailed case studies close the chapter that emphasize understanding the impact of critical microstructural factors, along with a balanced approach to alloy selection, manufacturing and surface finishing in order to show how each is key to achieving desired anodic oxide performance and appearance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Runge, J. M. (2014). Anodizing for design and function. Journal of Materials Science and Nanotechnology, 1, S108.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Song, G.-L. (2014). The grand challenges in electrochemical corrosion research. Frontiers in Materials, 1, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2014.00002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chesterfield, L., & Runge, J. (2010). Connecting theory to practice, the science of successfully anodizing aluminum die castings. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Technical Conference and Exposition of the Aluminum Anodizers Council, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Runge, J. M. Base metal microstructural considerations for anodizing aluminum. In: Proceedings of the Iran International Aluminum Conference (IIAC2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Runge, J. (2008). Interfacial phenomena and anodizing: ramifications and process solutions. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual AAC Conference, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Runge, J. (2016, May). Base metal microstructural considerations for anodizing aluminum extrusions. In: Proceedings of Eleventh International Aluminum Extrusion Technology Seminar, (ET 2016), Chicago, IL. Extrusion Technology for Aluminum Profiles Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tabrizian, N., Ambat, R., Møller, P., & Hansen, H. N. (2008). Effect of microstructure of AlMg0.5Cu and AlMg0.7Si on the Optical Quality of Anodic Film. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual Anodizing Conference and Expo, the Aluminum Anodizers Council, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu, H., Dahle, A. K., Zhang, X., & Couper, M. J. (2008). Effect of extrusion microstructure on formation of streaking defects on the surface of anodized aluminum extrusions. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual Anodizing Conference and Expo, the Aluminum Anodizers Council, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Runge, J. (2012). Trace elements and their impact on surface finishing characteristics of aluminum extrusions. In: Proceedings of ET 2012, Miami.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Runge, J. (2016). Base metal microstructural considerations for anodizing aluminum extrusions. In: Proceedings of Eleventh International Aluminum Extrusion Technology Seminar, (ET 2016), Chicago, IL. Extrusion Technology for Aluminum Profiles Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Runge, J. Understanding the interface: Meeting the challenges of anodizing cast substrates. In: Proceedings of the 2016 AAC Annual Technical Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Runge, J. M., & Hossain, T. (2015). Interfacial phenomena in 7000 series alloys and their impact on the anodic oxide. In: Proceedings of Aluminium Two Thousand World Congress and International Conference on Extrusion and Benchmark ICEB 2015; Elsevier Science Direct.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schey, J. A. (1977). Introduction to manufacturing processes. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Runge, J. M. (2002). The use of hot isostatic pressing as a means to enhance metal finishing. In: Proceedings of the IHAA Biannual Technical Conference, Quebec City, QC, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Polmear, I. (2006). Light alloys, from traditional alloys to nanocrystals. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Birbilis, N., & Buchheit, R. (2005). Electrochemical characteristics of intermetallic phases in aluminum alloys and experimental survey and discussion. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 152(4), B140–B151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Asensio-Lozano, J., Suárez-Peña, B., & Vander Voort, G. (2014). Effect of processing steps on the mechanical properties and surface appearance of 6063 aluminium extruded products. Materials, 4224–4242.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sanders, R. E., Hollinshead, P. A., & Simielli, E. A. (2004). Industrial development of non-heat treatable aluminum alloys. Materials Forum, 28, 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Porter, D. A., & Easterling, K. E. (1992). Phase transformations in metals and alloys (2nd ed.). Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jones, D. A. (1996). Principles and prevention of corrosion (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  21. The Aluminum Association. “Extrusion” and “Forging”. Retrieved from www.aluminum.org.

  22. Altenpohl, D. G. (1998). Aluminum: Technology, application and environment: A profile of a modern metal, aluminum from within (6th ed.). Washington, DC: The Aluminum Association.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Strohmeier, B. (1989). Surface characterization of aluminum foil annealed in the presence of ammonium fluoborate. Applied Surface Science, 40, 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Parsons, R. (1987). Chapter 2: The electric double layer at the solid-solution interface. In W. Stumm (Ed.), Aquatic surface chemistry. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Scamans, G. M., Frolish, M. F., Rainforth, W. M., Zhou, Z., Liu, Y., Zhou, X., & Thompson, G. E. (2010). The ubiquitous beilby layer on aluminium surfaces. Surface and Interface Analysis, 42, 175–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Searles, J., et al. (2001). Stress corrosion cracking of sensitized AA5083 (Al-4.5Mg-1.0Mn). Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 32(11), 2259–2867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hatch, J. (1999). Aluminum: Properties and physical metallurgy (9th ed.). Cleveland: Aluminum Association/ASM International.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All data and photographic images in this chapter are presented with the expressed written consent of the industrial partners, together with whom this work was accomplished. The author is deeply grateful for their permission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Runge, J.M. (2018). Base Metal Microstructural Considerations for Anodizing Aluminum Substrates. In: The Metallurgy of Anodizing Aluminum. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72177-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics