Advertisement

Conflict Management for Refugee Management

  • Michael ReissEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants in one of its annexes provides a comprehensive refugee response framework (A/RES/71/1). This chapter contributes to it by providing conflict management know-how for managing the refugee challenge. It addresses various target groups: refugee service managers, particularly conflict management service providers; conflicting parties; coordinating agencies; departments of immigration; commissioners for integration; ombudspersons; compliance managers; lawmakers; politicians; mediators, including special representatives of the UN Secretary-General, arbiters, judges, jurors, as well as members of courts, reconciliation commissions, round tables, councils, and peacemaking circles. The focus is on managing a landscape of multiple interconnected conflicts related to the refugee challenge from a European perspective.

In theory and practice, conflict management related to the refugee challenge is focused on managing several conflicts separately. By contrast, little attention is given to managing a “nexus” of interconnected conflicts. Multiconflict management copes with interconnected multiparty and/or multiissue and/or multistrategy constellations, which are typical of the refugee-related conflict landscape. These constellations require more than just prioritizing conflict engagements against the background of limited resources for conflict management. Both diagnostic and intervention activities concentrate on the three drivers of complex multiconflict constellations: embeddedness of actors in refugee-related relationships, interdependencies between different conflict issues, and spillovers between strategies of conflict management. Nexus-based strategies of intervention aim at modifying the issue nexus, strategy nexus, and relationship nexus.

Keywords

Conflict Refugee management Conflict management Complexity Interconnected conflicts 

References

  1. A/RES/71/1 New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants. 19 September 2016.Google Scholar
  2. Basadur, M., Pringle, P., Speranzini, G., Bacot, M. (2000). Collaborative problem solving through creativity in problem definition. Creativity and Innovation Management, 9, 54–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouncken, R. B., Gast, J., Kraus, S., Bogers, M. (2015). Coopetition: A systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions. Review of Managerial Science, 9, 577–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Celona, J. (2016). Winning at litigation through decision analysis. Creating and executing winning strategies in any litigation or dispute. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Deutsch, M. (2014). Cooperation, competition, and conflict. In P. T. Coleman, M. Deutsch, & E. C. Marcus (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (3rd ed., pp. 23–42). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 660–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Easley, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010). Networks, crowds, and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Everett, M. G., & Borgatti, S. P. (2014). Networks containing negative ties. Social Networks, 38, 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gelfand, M., Shteynberg, G., Lee, T., Lun, J., Lyons, S., Bell, C. et al. (2012). The cultural contagion of conflict. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 367, 692–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamann, P. M., Schiemann, F., Bellora, L., Guenther, T. W. (2013). Exploring the dimensions of organizational performance: A construct validity study. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoffmann, W. H. (2007). Strategies for managing a portfolio of alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 827–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jehn, K. A., Rispens, S., Jonsen, K., Greer, L. (2013). Conflict contagion: A temporal perspective on the development of conflict within teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 24, 352–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kilmann, R., & Thomas, K. W. (1977). Developing a forced-choice measure of conflict-handling behavior: The “MODE” instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 309–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kriesberg, L. (2011). The state of the art in conflict transformation. Retrieved March 4, 2017, from http://image.berghof-foundation.org/fileadmin/redaktion/Publications/Handbook/Articles/kriesberg_handbook.pdf
  16. Liu, W., Liu, L. A., & Zhan, J. D. (2016). How to dissolve fixed-pie bias in negotiation? Social antecedents and the mediating effect of mental model adjustment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lovas, B., & Ghoshal, S. (2000). Strategy as guided evolution. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 875–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lumineau, F., Eckerd, S., & Handley, S. (2015). Inter-organizational conflicts: Research overview, challenges, and opportunities. Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation, 1, 42–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Malhotra, D., & Lumineau, F. (2011). Trust and collaboration in the aftermath of conflict: The effects of contract structure. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 981–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nalebuff, B., & Brandenburger, A. M. (1996). Co-opetition: A revolution mindset that combines competition and cooperation. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  21. Newman, M. E. J. (2013). Networks: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Phillips, J., Liu, B. S., & Costello, T. C. (1998). A balance theory of perspective of triadic supply chain relationships. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 6(4), 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rahim, M. A. (2002). Toward a theory of managing organizational conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13, 206–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reiss, M. (2011). Complementor relationship management. Missing link in supply chain management. In R. Samson (Ed.), Supply-chain management: Theories, activities and problems (pp. 139–156). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Reiss, M. (2012). Change management. Norderstedt: BoD.Google Scholar
  26. Reiss, M. (2016). Multi-conflict management in supply networks. In M. M. Habib (Ed.), Supply chain management: practices, applications and challenges (pp. 149–171). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Ritter, T. (2000). A framework for analyzing interconnectedness of relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 29, 317–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schaller-Demers, D. (2008). Conflict: A catalyst for institutional change. Journal of Research Administration, 39, 81–90.Google Scholar
  29. Scholten, P., Entzinger, H., Penninx, R., Verbeek, S. (Eds.). (2015). Integrating immigrants in Europe research-policy dialogues. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Stoshikj, M. (2014). Integrative and distributive negotiations and negotiation behavior. Journal of Service Science Research, 6, 29–69.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12927-014-0002-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vallacher, R. R., Coleman, P. T., Nowak, A., Bui-Wrzosinska, L. (2010). Rethinking intractable conflict: The perspective of dynamical systems. American Psychologist, 65, 262–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wassmer, U. (2010). Alliance portfolios: A review and research Agenda. Journal of Management, 36, 141–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. WEF. (2017). Global risk report. Retrieved March 4, 2017, from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GRR17_Report_web.pdf
  34. Whitaker, B. E. (2003). Refugees and the spread of conflicts: Contrasting cases in Central Africa. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 38, 211–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business AdministrationStuttgart UniversityStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations