Skip to main content

Gender Differences in Mohs Micrographic Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 845 Accesses

Abstract

Gender differences in Mohs micrographic surgery stem from various gender specific characteristics, including lifestyle, psychosocial and behavioral differences, sun exposure patterns and aesthetic concerns. These differences lead to variations in the tumor biology and anatomy of skin cancer. In addition, patient preferences and physician gender based biases influence the therapeutic approach and outcome of MMS in the different genders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shriner DL, McCoy DK, Goldberg DJ, Wagner RF. Mohs micrographic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;39(1):79–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amber KT, Bloom R, Abyaneh MA, Falto-Aizpurua LA, Viera M, Zaiac MN, Nouri K, Hu S. Patient factors and their association with nonmelanoma skin cancer morbidity and the performance of self-skin exams: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2016;9(9):16.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bowen GM, White GL, Gerwels JW. Mohs micrographic surgery. Am Fam Physician. 2005;72(5):845–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reeder VJ, Gustafson CJ, Mireku K, Davis SA, Feldman SR, Pearce DJ. Trends in Mohs surgery from 1995 to 2010: an analysis of nationally representative data. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41(3):397–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nosrati A, Berliner JG, Goel S, McGuire J, Morhenn V, de Souza JR, Yeniay Y, Singh R, Lee K, Nakamura M, Wu RR. Outcomes of melanoma in situ treated with Mohs micrographic surgery compared with wide local excision. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153(5):436–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee KC, William Higgins H, Linden O, Cruz AP. Gender differences in tumor and patient characteristics in those undergoing Mohs surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(6):686–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bastiaens MT, Hoefnagel JJ, Vermeer BJ, Bavinck JN, Bruijn JA, Westendorp RG. Differences in age, site distribution, and sex between nodular and superficial basal cell carcinomas indicate different types of tumors. J Investig Dermatol. 1998;110(6):880–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leibovitch I, Huilgol SC, Selva D, Hill D, Richards S, Paver R. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery in Australia I. Experience over 10 years. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53(2):253–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Batra RS, Kelley LC. Predictors of extensive subclinical spread in nonmelanoma skin cancer treated with Mohs micrographic surgery. Arch Dermatol. 2002;138(8):1043–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu S, Han J, Vleugels RA, Puett R, Laden F, Hunter DJ, Qureshi AA. Cumulative ultraviolet radiation flux in adulthood and risk of incident skin cancers in women. Br J Cancer. 2014;110(7):1855–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kricker A, et al. Does intermittent sun exposure cause basal cell carcinoma? A case-control study in Western Australia. Int J Cancer. 1995;60(4):489–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen AF, Landy DC, Kumetz E, Smith G, Weiss E, Saleeby ER. Prediction of postoperative pain after Mohs micrographic surgery with 2 validated pain anxiety scales. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41(1):40–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Amber KT, Bloom R, Abyaneh MA, Falto-Aizpurua LA, Viera M, Zaiac MN, Nouri K, Hu S. Patient factors and their association with nonmelanoma skin cancer morbidity and the performance of self-skin exams: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2016;9(9):16.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Buster KJ, You Z, Fouad M, Elmets C. Skin cancer risk perceptions: a comparison across ethnicity, age, education, gender, and income. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66(5):771–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mora RG, Robins P. Basal-cell carcinomas in the center of the face: special diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic considerations. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1978;4(4):315–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Freischlag JA. Women surgeons—still in a male-dominated world. Yale J Biol Med. 2008;81(4):203–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Metzger, Y.C. (2018). Gender Differences in Mohs Micrographic Surgery. In: Tur, E., Maibach, H. (eds) Gender and Dermatology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72156-9_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72156-9_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72155-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72156-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics