Advertisement

Godfather Politics and Exclusionary Local Representation in REDD+: A Case Study of the Design of the UN-REDD-Supervised Nigeria-REDD Proposal

  • Emmanuel O. Nuesiri
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Natural Resource Management book series (PSNRM)

Abstract

Nuesiri assesses the UN-REDD (United Nations Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries) commitment to strengthen local democracy as a safeguard protecting local interests in REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation with the added goals of Conserving and Enhancing Forest Carbon Stocks, and Sustainably Managing Forests). The chapter examines local representation during the consultative process associated with the Nigeria-REDD proposal. Local representation was through selected individuals (descriptive representatives), customary authority, and NGOs (symbolic representatives). Elected local government authorities (substantive representatives) were excluded from the consultative process. Exclusion of elected local governments is linked to godfather politics in Nigeria, which enables state governors to subordinate local government authority and constrain their responsiveness to local needs. In approving the Nigeria-REDD proposal, the UN-REDD reinforced the subversion of local democracy in Nigeria. The UN-REDD would be fulfilling its democracy objectives in Nigeria by engaging substantively all local governance actors, including elected local government authorities.

References

  1. Accra Caucus. (2013). Redd+ Safeguards: More than Good Intentions? Case Studies from the Accra Caucus. Oslo: Rainforest Foundation.Google Scholar
  2. Adesopo, A. (2011). Re-Examining the Failing Inter-Governmental Fiscal Relations and Sustenance of Nigerian Federation: An Empirical Study. Asian Social Science, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v5537n5510p5107.
  3. Adetula, V. A. O. (2008). Money and Politics in Nigeria. Retrieved from http://www.ifes.org/files/MONEYandPOLITICSinNigeria.pdf
  4. Albert, I. O. (2005). Explaining ‘Godfatherism’ in Nigerian Politics. African Sociological Review/Revue Africaine de Sociologie, 9(2), 79–105.Google Scholar
  5. Animasawun, G. A. (2013). Godfatherism in Nigeria’s Fourth Republic: The Pyramid of Violence and Political Insecurity in Ibadan, Oyo-State, Nigeria (Ifra-Nigeria E-Papers Series No. 27). Abuja: IFRA-Nigeria.Google Scholar
  6. ARD. (2001). Nigeria: Local Government Assessment, Report Prepared for Usaid. Burlington: ARD Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Baiocchi, G. (2001). Participation, Activism, and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experiment and Deliberative Democratic Theory. Politics & Society, 29(1), 43–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baker, S. (2007). Sustainable Development as Symbolic Commitment: Declaratory Politics and the Seductive Appeal of Ecological Modernisation in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 16(2), 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barkan, J. D., Gboyega, A., & Stevens, M. (2001). State and Local Governance in Nigeria. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  10. Blatter, J. (2009). Performing Symbolic Politics and International Environmental Regulation: Tracing and Theorizing a Causal Mechanism Beyond Regime Theory. Global Environmental Politics, 9(4), 81–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blühdorn, I. (2007). Sustaining the Unsustainable: Symbolic Politics and the Politics of Simulation. Environmental Politics, 16(2), 251–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Brysk, A. (1995). “Hearts and Minds”: Bringing Symbolic Politics Back In. Polity, 27(4), 559–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. CERCOPAN. (2013). History and Milestones. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from http://cercopan.org/history-and-milestones/
  15. CIF. (2010). Enhancing Cooperation and Coherence Among Multilateral Redd+ Institutions to Support Redd+ Activities. Washington, DC: Climate Investment Funds.Google Scholar
  16. CLGF. (2011a). Clgf Pledges to Help Strengthen Local Government in Nigeria [Press Release]. CLGF. Retrieved from http://www.clgf.org.uk/whats-new/news/clgf-pledges-to-help-strengthen-local-government-in-nigeria/?muraadminpreview&muraadminpreview&mobileformat=false
  17. CLGF. (2011b). The Local Government System in Nigeria. In CLGF (Ed.), The Commonwealth Local Government Handbook 2011/12 (pp. 148–151). London: Publications UK.Google Scholar
  18. Commission on Global Governance. (1995). Our Global Neighbourhood: The Report of the Commission on Global Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Corbera, E., & Schroeder, H. (2011). Governing and Implementing Redd+. Environmental Science & Policy, 14(2), 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. CrossRiver Watch. (2013a). Cross River Lg Polls: Boxing in Govt House as More Pdp Flag Bearers Emerge. CrossRiver Watch. Retrieved from http://crossriverwatch.com/2013/05/cross-river-lg-polls-boxing-in-govt-house-as-more-pdp-flag-bearers-emerge/
  21. CrossRiver Watch. (2013b). Cross River Lg Polls: Confusion as Crosiec Disqualifies Apc. CrossRiver Watch. Retrieved from http://crossriverwatch.com/2013/08/cross-river-lg-polls-confusion-as-crosiec-disqualifies-apc/
  22. CrossRiver Watch. (2013c). Lg Polls: Pdp Agents, Crosiec Officials Caught on Video Thumb Printing Ballot Papers in Calabar. CrossRiver Watch. Retrieved from http://crossriverwatch.com/2013/09/lg-polls-pdp-agents-caught-on-video-thumprinting-ballot-papers-in-calabar/
  23. CrossRiver Watch. (2013d). Political Violence Erupts in Yakurr Local Government. CrossRiver Watch. Retrieved from http://crossriverwatch.com/2013/03/political-violence-erupts-in-yakurr-local-government/
  24. CRS. (2008). Communique of the Stakeholders’ Summit on the Environment Organized by the Government of Cross River State. Calabar, from http://tropicalforestgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/crsoutcomesdOC.pdf
  25. Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  26. DeCanio, S. (2005). Murray Edelman on Symbols and Ideology in Democratic Politics. Critical Review, 17(3–4), 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Diejomaoh, I., & Eboh, E. (2012). Local Governments in Nigeria: Relevance and Effectiveness in Poverty Reduction and Economic Development. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 12–28.Google Scholar
  28. Dryzek, J. S., & Niemeyer, S. (2008). Discursive Representation. American Political Science Review, 102(4), 481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dyer, N., Counsell, S., & Cravatte, J. (2012). Rainforest Roulette? Why Creating a Forest Carbon Offset Market Is a Risky Bet for Redd. London: Rainforest Foundation UK.Google Scholar
  30. Edelman, M. J. (1985). The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  31. Eliasch, J. (2008). Climate Change: Financing Global Forests: The Eliasch Review. London: Office of Climate Change.Google Scholar
  32. Ellis, S., & Ter Haar, G. (2004). Worlds of Power: Religious Thought and Political Practice in Africa. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
  33. Fasakin, A. (2011). Non-Governmental Organisations and Civil Corruption in Nigeria’s Public Space. Presented at the International Conference on Corruption, Governance and Development in Nigeria Organized by the Aminu Kano Centre for Democratic Research and Training in Conjunction with UNECA and the UNDP, Bayero University, Kano, December 6–8.Google Scholar
  34. FGN. (1978). Nigeria Land Use Act 1978. Abuja: Federal Government of Nigeria.Google Scholar
  35. FGN. (1999). Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Abuja: Federal Government of Nigeria.Google Scholar
  36. Filou, E. (2010, March 15). Odigha Odigha: Speaking Truth to Power. Ecosystem Marketplace. Retrieved from http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/articles/odigha-odigha-speaking-truth-to-power/
  37. FME. (2011). Nigeria’s Redd+ Readiness Programme (2012–2015). Abuja: Federal Ministry of Environment.Google Scholar
  38. Fraser, N. (2007). Reframing Justice in a Globalizing World. In D. Held & A. Kaya (Eds.), Global Inequality: Patterns and Explanations (pp. 252–272). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  39. Friedman, E. J., Hochstetler, K., & Clark, A. M. (2005). Sovereignty, Democracy, and Global Civil Society: State-Society Relations at Un World Conferences. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  40. Galtung, J. (2000). Alternative Models for Global Democracy. In B. Holden (Ed.), Global Democracy: Key Debates (pp. 143–161). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Gboyega, A. (2003). Democratization and Local Governance in Nigeria Since 1999. Presented at the Workshop on Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  42. Goodin, R. E. (2007). Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 35(1), 40–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Government of Akwa Ibom State. (2012, July 23). 76 Oil Wells – How Cross River State Went to Court and Lost. Akwa Ibom State Government, The Nigerian Voice. Retrieved from https://www.thenigerianvoice.com/news/95131/76-oil-wells-how-cross-river-state-went-to-court-and-lost.html
  44. Grunebaum, J. (1981). What Ought the Representative Represent? In N. Bowie (Ed.), Ethical Issues and Government (pp. 54–67). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Harcourt, A. H., Stewart, K. J., & Inahoro, I. M. (1989). Nigeria’s Gorillas. Primate Conservation, 10, 73–79.Google Scholar
  46. HRW. (2007). Criminal Politics: Violence, “Godfathers” and Corruption in Nigeria. Human Rights Watch. Retrieved from https://www.hrw.org/reports/2007/nigeria1007/
  47. Hurdock, A. (1999). Ngos and Civil Society. London: Polity.Google Scholar
  48. Iriekpen, D. (2013). Succour on the Way for Lgas. This Day. Retrieved from http://allafrica.com/stories/201305140883.html
  49. Ite, U. E. (1996). Community Perceptions of the Cross River National Park, Nigeria. Environmental Conservation, 23(4), 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ite, U. E. (1997). Small Farmers and Forest Loss in Cross River National Park, Nigeria. Geographical Journal, 163(1), 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ite, U. E. (1998). New Wine in an Old Skin: The Reality of Tropical Moist Forest Conservation in Nigeria. Land Use Policy, 15(2), 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Joseph, R. A. (1987). Democracy and Prebendal Politics in Nigeria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Joseph, R. A. (1996). Nigeria: Inside the Dismal Tunnel. Current History, 95, 193.Google Scholar
  54. Kateb, G. (1981). The Moral Distinctiveness of Representative Democracy. Ethics, 91(3), 357–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kaufer, D. S., & Carley, K. M. (1993). Condensation Symbols: Their Variety and Rhetorical Function in Political Discourse. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 26, 201–226.Google Scholar
  56. Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1999). Transnational Advocacy Networks in International and Regional Politics. International Social Science Journal, 51(159), 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kelsall, T. (2008). Going with the Grain in African Development? Development Policy Review, 26(6), 627–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Konings, P. (2011). Settling Border Conflicts in Africa Peacefully: Lessons Learned from the Bakassi Dispute Between Cameroon and Nigeria. In J. Abbink & M. de Bruijn (Eds.), Law and Politics in Africa: Mediating Conflict and Reshaping the State (pp. 191–210). Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Koonings, K. (2004). Strengthening Citizenship in Brazil’s Democracy: Local Participatory Governance in Porto Alegre. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 23(1), 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Leadership. (2013, August 3). Algon Lauds Nigerians’ Support for Lg Autonomy. Leadership Newspaper Nigeria. Retrieved from https://thinkprogress.org/cities-states-businesses-measure-paris-targets-d24a314c98c4/
  61. Lombardo, E., & Meier, P. (2014). The Symbolic Representation of Gender: A Discursive Approach. Hampstead: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Google Scholar
  62. Machimura, T. (1998). Symbolic Use of Globalization in Urban Politics in Tokyo. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 22(2), 183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Manin, B., Przeworski, A., & Stokes, S. (1999). Introduction. In B. Manin, A. Przeworski, & S. Stokes (Eds.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation (pp. 1–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent “Yes”. The Journal of Politics, 61(3), 628–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Marion, N. E., & Oliver, W. M. (2010). Symbolic Politics, Criminal Justice Policy, and Third Political Party Platforms. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 21(4), 476–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Matten, D. (2003). Symbolic Politics in Environmental Regulation: Corporate Strategic Responses. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(4), 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. McGee, M. C. (1980). The “Ideograph”: A Link Between Rhetoric and Ideology. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 66(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mill, J. (2004). Considerations on Representative Government. State College: Penn State.Google Scholar
  69. Miller, H. T. (2012). Governing Narratives: Symbolic Politics and Policy Change. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  70. Montanaro, L. (2012). The Democratic Legitimacy of Self-Appointed Representatives. The Journal of Politics, 74(4), 1094–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Norwegian Government. (2007). Norwegian Climate Policy. Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of the Environment.Google Scholar
  72. Norwegian Government. (2008). Un and Norway Unite to Combat Climate Change from Deforestation. Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of the Environment.Google Scholar
  73. Nuesiri, E. (2012). The Re-emergence of Customary Authority and Its Relation with Local Democratic Government (Responsive Forest Governance Initiative (RFGI), Working Paper 6). Dakar: CODESRIA.Google Scholar
  74. Oladesu, E., & Salaudeen, L. (2013, November 25). Governors for Senate, Senators for Governor. The Nation. Retrieved from http://thenationonlineng.net/governors-for-senate-senators-for-governor/
  75. Olesen, G., Bouveyron, C., Clifton, J., Danesi, J., Keilbach, J., Manson, N., & Reichert, R. (2010). Country Level Evaluation Nigeria Final Report – Volume I: Main Report, Consultancy Report for the European Commission. New York: OECD.Google Scholar
  76. Olubusoye, E. O., & Oyedotun, T. T. D. (2012). Quantitative Evaluation of Revenue Allocation to States and Local Governments in Nigeria (1999–2008). European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 8(3), 224–243.Google Scholar
  77. Omar, M. (2012). Ensuring Free, Fair and Credible Elections in Local Governments in Nigeria. Developing Country Studies, 2(11), 75–81.Google Scholar
  78. Onu, G., & Biereenu-Nnabugwu, M. (2008). Dialectics of Patronage Politics and Representative Democracy: The Case of Anambra State of Nigeria. In V. O. Okafor (Ed.), Nigeria’s Stumbling Democracy and Its Implications for Africa’s Democratic Movement (pp. 56–78). Westport: Prager Security International.Google Scholar
  79. Orji, N., & Uzodi, N. (2012). Post-Election Violence in Nigeria: Experiences with the 2011 Elections. Abuja: Policy and Legal Advocacy Centre (PLAC).Google Scholar
  80. Oviasuyi, P., Idada, W., & Isiraojie, L. (2010). Constraints of Local Government Administration in Nigeria. Journal of Social Science, 24(2), 81–86.Google Scholar
  81. Oyebo, M., Bisong, F., & Morakinyo, T. (2010). A Preliminary Assessment of the Context for Redd in Nigeria. Calabar: Cross River State Forestry Commission.Google Scholar
  82. Pandrillus. (2013, November 25). Cities and States Solidify Their Plan to Move Forward on Climate Without Trump. Pandrillus. Retrieved from https://www.pandrillus.org/2012/11/peter-jenkins-installed-as-chairman-of-cross-river-state-anti-deforestation-taskforce/
  83. Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  84. Price, R. (2003). Transnational Civil Society and Advocacy in World Politics. World Politics, 55(4), 579–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rehfeld, A. (2006). Towards a General Theory of Political Representation. The Journal of Politics, 68(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Rehfeld, A. (2011). The Concepts of Representation. American Political Science Review, 105(3), 631–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Ribot, J., Chhatre, A., & Lankina, T. (2008). Introduction: Institutional Choice and Recognition in the Formation and Consolidation of Local Democracy. Conservation and Society, 6(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  88. Roe, S., Streck, C., Pritchard, L., & Costenbader, J. (2013). Safeguards in Redd+ and Forest Carbon Standards: A Review of Social, Environmental and Procedural Concepts and Application. Amsterdam: Climate Focus.Google Scholar
  89. Routley, L. (2011). Ngos and the Formation of the Public: Grey Practices and Accountability. African Affairs, 111(442), 116–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Runciman, D. (2007). The Paradox of Political Representation. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 15(1), 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sadoun, B. (2007). Political Space for Non-Governmental Organizations in United Nations World Summit Processes (Civil Society and Social Movements Programme Paper Number 29). Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.Google Scholar
  92. Sahara Reporters. (2010). A Must Read: How Governors Rig Elections. Sahara Reporters. Retrieved from http://saharareporters.com/2010/07/18/must-read-how-governors-rig-elections-donald-duke-guardian
  93. Saward, M. (2006). The Representative Claim. Contemporary Political Theory, 5(3), 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Saward, M. (2008). Representation and Democracy: Revisions and Possibilities. Sociology Compass, 2(3), 1000–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Schaffer, J. K. (2012). The Boundaries of Transnational Democracy: Alternatives to the All-Affected Principle. Review of International Studies, 38(2), 321–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Schatzberg, M. G. (2001). Political Legitimacy in Middle Africa: Father, Family, Food. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Scholte, J. A. (2004). Civil Society and Democratically Accountable Global Governance. Government and Opposition, 39(2), 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sears, D. O. (1993). Symbolic Politics: A Socio-Psychological Theory. In S. Iyengar & W. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in Political Psychology (pp. 113–149). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Severs, E. (2010). Representation as Claims-Making. Quid Responsiveness? Representation, 46(4), 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Silveira, S. J. (2000). The American Environmental Movement: Surviving Through Diversity. BC Envrionmental Affairs Law Review, 28(2), 497–532.Google Scholar
  101. Smith, D. J. (2010). Corruption, Ngos, and Development in Nigeria. Third World Quarterly, 31(2), 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Stavins, R. N. (1998). What Can We Learn from the Grand Policy Experiment? Lessons from SO2 Allowance Trading. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3), 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. TMG. (2003). Do the Votes Count? Final Report of the 2003 General Elections in Nigeria. Abuja: Transition Monitoring Group.Google Scholar
  104. TMG. (2007). An Election Programmed to Fail: Final Report of the April 2007 General Elections in Nigeria. Abuja: Transition Monitoring Group.Google Scholar
  105. Tonwe, D. A. (2012). Fluidity in Democratic Local Governance: The Achilles’ Heel of Nigerian Local Government. Inkanyiso: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 75–82.Google Scholar
  106. Trends, F. (2008). Payments for Ecosystem Services: Getting Started—A Primer. Washington, DC: Forest Trends.Google Scholar
  107. UCLG. (2013). Local and Regional Governments: Partners for the Global Agenda. Barcelona: United Cities and Local Governments.Google Scholar
  108. Ugborgu, V. (2002, July 4). Nigeria: Murder at Dusk. Newswatch Nigeria News Magazine. Retrieved from http://allafrica.com/stories/200207100808.html
  109. Una, E. (2012, May 4). Timber Merchants Petition Imoke. PM News Newspaper Nigeria. Retrieved from http://pmnewsnigeria.com/2012/05/04/timber-merchants-petition-imoke/
  110. United Nations. (2004). We the Peoples: Civil Society, the United Nations and Global Governance, Report of the Panel of Eminent Persons on United Nations–Civil Society Relations. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  111. UN-REDD. (2008). Un Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries (Un-Redd), an Fao, Undp, Unep Framework Document. Geneva: UN-REDD.Google Scholar
  112. UN-REDD. (2009). Un-Redd Programme Rules of Procedure and Operational Guidance. Geneva: UN-REDD.Google Scholar
  113. UN-REDD. (2012a). Report of the Eighth Policy Board Meeting. Geneva: UN-REDD.Google Scholar
  114. UN-REDD. (2012b). Un-Redd Programme Social and Environmental Principles and Criteria. Geneva: UN-REDD.Google Scholar
  115. UN-REDD. (2013a). Guidelines on Free, Prior and Informed Consent. Geneva: UN-REDD.Google Scholar
  116. UN-REDD. (2013b). Un-Redd Programme Fund. Geneva: UN-REDD.Google Scholar
  117. UN-REDD. (2014). About the Un-Redd Programme. Geneva: UN-REDD.Google Scholar
  118. Urbinati, N., & Warren, M. E. (2008). The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(2008), 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. USAID. (2010). Property Rights and Resource Governance—Nigeria, Usaid Country Profile. Washington, DC: USAID.Google Scholar
  120. Usman, B., & Adefalu, L. (2010). Nigerian Forestry, Wildlife and Protected Areas: Status Report. Biodiversity, 11(3–4), 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Wedeen, L. (1998). Acting “as If”: Symbolic Politics and Social Control in Syria. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 40(3), 503–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Wintrobe, R. (1998). The Political Economy of Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Yilmaz, S., Beris, Y., & Serrano-Berthet, R. (2008). Local Government Discretion and Accountability: A Diagnostic Framework for Local Governance. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emmanuel O. Nuesiri
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Social SciencesUniversity of PotsdamPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations