Advertisement

When REDD+ Fails to Support Democratic Representation: Legitimizing Non-Democratic Practices in the Amazon

  • Carol M. Burga
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Natural Resource Management book series (PSNRM)

Abstract

This chapter examines the process by which indigenous communities of the Peruvian Amazon engage in REDD+ focusing on the mechanisms for local representation and the changes in rules and institutions brought by REDD+. Using two case studies, the author explores the risks of REDD+ reproducing and worsening exclusion, inequality, and elite capture through the imposition of tighter rules for social order and resource access. The author also draws attention to the potential negative effects of project interventions that seek to be apolitical, which can end up legitimizing non-democratic practices. The chapter concludes by highlighting the need for social protections for the most vulnerable, who are at risk of losing important assets and freedoms as well as citizenship and belonging in their communities.

References

  1. Abanto, A. (2011). La Institucionalidad Indígena En El Perú. Revista Argumentos, 5(3), 1–8.Google Scholar
  2. ADECOMP. (2011). Línea Base Social De La Comunidad Nativa Bélgica. Puerto Maldonado: López, E.Google Scholar
  3. Agrawal, A., & Ribot, J. (1999). Accountability in Decentralization: A Framework with South Asian and West African Cases. The Journal of Developing Areas, 33(4), 473–502.Google Scholar
  4. AIDER. (2011a). Convenio Marco De Cooperación Institucional [Framework Cooperation Agreement]. Iñapari: Asociación para la Investigación y Desarrollo Integral (AIDER) & Comunidad Nativa Bélgica.Google Scholar
  5. AIDER. (2011b). Estudio Legal Para Ratificar Y Mantener Los Derechos Legales De Uso De Los Recursos Del Bosque En El Territorio Comunal Y En La Concesión De Ecoturismo De La Comunidad Nativa De Infierno (Informe Final). Iñapari: Asociación para la Investigación y Desarrollo Integral (AIDER).Google Scholar
  6. AIDER. (2012). Plan De Acción Para La Gestión Del Bosque De La Comunidad Nativa De Infierno. Iñapari: Asociación para la Investigación y Desarrollo Integral (AIDER).Google Scholar
  7. Alexiades, M. N. (1999). Ethnobotany of the Ese Eja: Plants, Health, and Change in an Amazonian Society (PhD). CUNY, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Anderson, E., & Zerriffi, H. (2014). The Effects of REDD+ on Forest People in Africa: Access, Distribution, and Participation in Governance (Working Paper for the Responsive Forest Governance Initiative). Dakar: CODESRIA.Google Scholar
  9. Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Kanninen, M., Sills, E., Sunderlin, W., Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., … Johnson, E. (Eds.). (2009). Realising REDD: National Strategy and Policy Options. Bogor: Centre for International Forestry Research.Google Scholar
  10. Brotto, L. (2009). Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD): Organizational Issues in Bridging SFM Certification with Voluntary Carbon Market Standards (PhD PhD). University of Padova, Padova, Italy.Google Scholar
  11. Burga, C. (2014). Participation and Representation: REDD+ in the Native Communities of Bélgica and Infierno in the Peruvian Amazon (MA MA). University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana.Google Scholar
  12. Chirif, A. (2012). Derechos Indígenas En La Legislación Peruana, Informe Final. Lima: Instituto del Bien Común (IBC).Google Scholar
  13. Espinoza, R., Pacuri, F., & Cunachi, J. (2013). Construyendo REDD+ Indígena. Adecuación Intercultural Del REDD+ Perú a Los Derechos Territoriales Y Colectivos De Los Pueblos Indígenas. Lima: AIDESEP.Google Scholar
  14. FONAM. (2012). Peru Low Carbon Economy 2012: Carbon Projects Voluntary Markets REDD+ & NAMAs. [Pamphlet]. Lima: National Environmental Fund Peru (FONAM).Google Scholar
  15. Forsyth, T. (2009). Multilevel, Multiactor Governance in REDD+: Participation, Integration and Coordination. In A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, M. Kanninen, E. Sills, W. Sunderlin, S. Wertz-Kanounnikoff, T. Dokken, & E. Johnson (Eds.), Realising REDD: National Strategy and Policy Options (pp. 113–124). Bogor: Centre for International Forestry Research.Google Scholar
  16. ITTO. (2009). Sustainable Forest Management and Utilization of Ecosystem Services in Forests Managed by the Ese’eja Native Community in Infierno, Peru. (Project Document) ID Number: RED-PD 018/09 Rev.1 (F). Lima: International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO).Google Scholar
  17. Llanos, R., & Feather, C. (2011). The Reality of REDD+ in Peru: Between Theory and Practice-Indigenous Amazonian Peoples’ Analyses and Alternatives. Lima: AIDESEP/Forest Peoples Programme.Google Scholar
  18. O’Diana, R., & Vega, I. (2016). ¿Cómo Va La Aplicación De La Consulta Previa En El Perú?: Avances Y Retos. Lima: Centro Amazónico de Antropología y Aplicación Práctica (CAAAP).Google Scholar
  19. Pinedo, D., & Summers, P. (2001). Manejo Comunitario De Territorio En La Comunidad Nativa De Infierno—Rio Tambopata, Madre De Dios, Peru (Final Report). Amazon CBNRM Research Initiative. Lima: Instituto del Bien Común (IBC).Google Scholar
  20. Piu, H. C., & Menton, M. (2014). The Context of REDD+ in Peru: Drivers, Agents and Institutions (Occasional Paper 106). Bogor: CIFOR.Google Scholar
  21. Pollini, J. (2009). Contribution to the Design of a REDD+ Project: Socio-Economic Diagnosis and Analysis of Farming System in the Bélgica Native Community. Lima: Asesorandes.Google Scholar
  22. Przeworski, A., Stokes, S. C., & Manin, B. (1999). Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ravikumar, A., Burga, C., Bennett-Curry, A., & Gonzalez, J. (2015). Has Decentralization of Land Use Powers in Peru Been “Democratic?” Evidence from the Law and the Ground in the Amazon. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  24. Ribot, J. (2004). Waiting for Democracy: The Politics of Choice in Natural Resource Decentralization. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=uG2aAAAAIAAJ
  25. Ribot, J. (2010). Responsive Forest Governance Initiative (RFGI): Project Summary and Introduction. Urbana: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  26. Stronza, A. (2009). Commons Management and Ecotourism: Ethnographic Evidence from the Amazon. International Journal of the Commons, 4(1), 56–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stronza, A., & Durham, W. H. (2008). Ecotourism and Conservation in the Americas. Wallingford: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carol M. Burga
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geography and Geographic Information ScienceUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations