Skip to main content

Global Forest Governance and Climate Change: Introduction and Overview

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Forest Governance and Climate Change

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Natural Resource Management ((PSNRM))

  • 618 Accesses

Abstract

The book shows that Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) is reconfiguring forest governance, including decentralized forestry arrangements, in ways that might deepen the subjection of local people to the interests of powerful actors (governments, business, and NGOs) in the forestry sector. However, local people and authorities are contesting their subjection under new governance arrangements due to adoption of REDD+. What this top-down reconfiguration of governance and bottom-up contestation will bring about is open to debate. This volume’s major contribution is to call on researchers, policymakers at global and national levels, and non-state actors with powerful influence on decision-making to choose inclusive and complementary representation of local communities in participatory processes associated with the adoption of REDD+.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Knowles (2017, September 17) Why Hurricanes Harvey and Irma won’t lead to action on climate change.

References

  • Caucus, A. (2013). REDD+ Safeguards: More Than Good Intentions? Case Studies from the Accra Caucus. Oslo: Rainforest Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celis, K., Childs, S., Kantola, J., & Krook, M. L. (2008). Rethinking Women’s Substantive Representation. Representation, 44(2), 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). The Case for Participation as Tyranny. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation: The New Tyranny? (pp. 1–15). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, C., & Lipton, E. (2017, June 3). How G.O.P. Leaders Came to View Climate Change as Fake Science. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/03/us/politics/republican-leaders-climate-change.html?mcubz=1

  • Dovi, S. (2002). Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black, or Latino Do? American Political Science Review, 96(4), 729–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovi, S. (2009). In Praise of Exclusion. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 1172–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, K., & Connerley, E. (2010). Democracy, Development, and Security as Objectives of Decentralization. In E. Connerley, K. Eaton, & P. J. Smoke (Eds.), Making Decentralization Work: Democracy, Development, and Security (pp. 1–24). Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ece, M., Murombedzi, J., & Ribot, J. (2017). Disempowering Democracy: Local Representation in Community and Carbon Forestry in Africa. Conservation and Society, 15(4), 357–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Focus, C. (2015). Forests and Land Use in the Paris Agreement, Climate Focus Client Brief on the Paris Agreement I. Amsterdam: Climate Focus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiling, N. (2017, July 12). Cities and States Solidify Their Plan to Move Forward on Climate Without Trump. Think Progress. Retrieved from https://thinkprogress.org/cities-states-businesses-measure-paris-targets-d24a314c98c4/

  • Knowles, S. G. (2017, September 17). Why Hurricanes Harvey and Irma Won’t Lead to Action on Climate Change. The Conversation. Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/why-hurricanes-harvey-and-irma-wont-lead-to-action-on-climate-change-83770

  • Manin, B., Przeworski, A., & Stokes, S. (1999). Introduction. In B. Manin, A. Przeworski, & S. Stokes (Eds.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation (pp. 1–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent “Yes”. The Journal of Politics, 61(3), 628–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, V. (2017, July 9). G20 Leaders Move Forward on Paris Climate Deal, Without Us. The Economic Times. Retrieved from http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/environment/global-warming/g20-leaders-move-forward-on-paris-climate-deal-without-us/articleshow/59507235.cms

  • Montanaro, L. (2017). Representing Affected Interests. In M. B. Vieira (Ed.), Reclaiming Representation: Contemporary Advances in the Theory of Political Representation (pp. 21–226). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehfeld, A. (2011). The Concepts of Representation. American Political Science Review, 105(3), 631–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribot, J. (2016). RFGI Handbook I: Leveraging Local Democracy through Forestry (Field Testing Version) (Responsive Forest Governance Initiative Working Paper Series No. 34). Dakar: CODESRIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribot, J. (2017). Choosing Democracy: Natural Resource Management for Environmental Policy Makers, Donors and Practitioners (Policy Brief). Visby: Swedish International Center for Local Democracy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, S., Streck, C., Pritchard, L., & Costenbader, J. (2013). Safeguards in REDD+ and Forest Carbon Standards: A Review of Social, Environmental and Procedural Concepts and Application. Amsterdam: Climate Focus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saward, M. (2010). The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schedler, A. (1999). Conceptualizing Accountability. In A. Schedler, L. J. Diamond, & M. F. Plattner (Eds.), The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies (pp. 13–28). Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2015). The Paris Agreement. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php

  • UN-REDD. (2008). Un Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries (UN-REDD), an FAO, UNDP, UNEP Framework Document. Geneva: UN-REDD.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-REDD. (2013). Guidelines on Free, Prior and Informed Consent. Geneva: UN-REDD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbinati, N. (2000). Representation as Advocacy: A Study of Democratic Deliberation. Political Theory, 28(6), 758–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbinati, N., & Warren, M. E. (2008). The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(2008), 387–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. S. (1998). Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy Oxford University Press. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nuesiri, E.O. (2018). Global Forest Governance and Climate Change: Introduction and Overview. In: Nuesiri, E. (eds) Global Forest Governance and Climate Change. Palgrave Studies in Natural Resource Management . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71946-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71946-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71945-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71946-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics