Abstract
Optimization consists of maximizing or minimizing an objective function: the value of the objective function is determined by several input parameters. This process may be attempted by varying the parameters by hand until a desired match is obtained; however, this approach might be extremely time consuming, onerous and error prone.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Azari V, Vazquez O, Mackay E et al (2022a) Gradient descent algorithm to optimize the offshore scale squeeze treatments. J Petrol Sci Eng 208:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109469
Azari V, Vazquez O, Kuncoro H et al (2022b) Non-uniqueness of adsorption isotherm history matching in squeeze treatments. In: SPE international oilfield scale conference and exhibition. https://doi.org/10.2118/209504-ms
Azari V et al (2020) Squeeze design optimization by considering operational constraints, numerical simulation and mathematical modelling. In: SPE international oilfield scale conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Azari V et al (2021) Full-field optimization of offshore squeeze campaigns in total Gulf of Guinea fields. SPE Prod Oper (March) 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2118/204384-pa
Cowan JC, Weintritt DJ (1976) Water-formed scale deposits. Gulf Publishing Company, Knovel
Dubin L (1986) Silica inhibition: prevention of silica deposition by boric acid/orthorborate ion. United States
Francisco M et al (2005) A comparative study of deterministic and stochastic optimization methods for Integrated Design of processes. In: IFAC proceedings volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline), 16 (December 2013), pp 335–340. https://doi.org/10.3182/20050703-6-cz-1902.00917
Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search optimization and machine learning. Addison Wesley
Hong SA, Shuler PJ (1988) Mathematical model for the scale-inhibitor squeeze process. SPE Prod Eng 3(4):597–607. https://doi.org/10.2118/16263-pa
Jordan MM, Sutherland L, Johnston C (2020) Developments in squeeze treatments design—WHY not apply 24 month duration squeeze to offshore production wells? In: Society of petroleum engineers—SPE international oilfield scale conference and exhibition, OSS 2020 [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.2118/200701-ms
Kahrwad M, Sorbie KS, Boak LS (2009) Coupled adsorption/precipitation of scale inhibitors: experimental results and modeling. SPE Prod Oper (August) 481–491. http://www.onepetro.org/mslib/servlet/onepetropreview?id=SPE-114108-PA
Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: IEEE international conference on neural networks—conference proceedings
Mackay E, Jordan MM (2003a) SQUEEZE modelling: treatment design and case histories. In: SPE European formation damage conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Mackay EJ, Jordan MM (2003b) Natural sulphate ion stripping during seawater flooding in chalk reservoirs. In: RSC chemistry in the oil industry VIII conference, Manchester, UK
Onwubolu GC, Babu BV (2013) New optimization techniques in engineering. Springer
Reyes-sierra M, Coello CAC (2006) Multi-objective particle swarm optimizers: a survey of the state-of-the-art. Int J Comput Intell Res 2(3):287–308
Spall JC (2003) Introduction to stochastic search and optimization: estimation, simulation, and control. Wiley-Interscience, New York
Storn R, Price K (1995) Differential evolution—a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Glob Optim 23(1):1–12. ftp://ftp.icsi.berkeley.edu/pub/techreports/1995/tr-95-012.pdf
Tambach T et al (2022) Isotherm history matching and scale squeeze treatment design optimization in the Gulf of Mexico. In: SPE international oilfield scale conference and exhibition. https://doi.org/10.2118/209481-ms
Valiakhmetova, A. (2019) Mechanistic study of precipitation squeeze treatments using phosphonate and phosphate ester scale inhibitors. Heriot Watt University
Vazquez O, Mackay E, Jordan M (2009a) Modeling the impact of diesel vs. water overflush fluids on scale-squeeze-treatment lives using a two-phase near-wellbore simulator. SPE Prod Oper 24(3). https://doi.org/10.2118/114105-PA
Vazquez O, Mackay E, Sorbie K (2009b) Towards automation of the history matching process for scale inhibitor squeeze modelling. In: 20th NIF oilfield chemistry symposium, pp 22–25
Vazquez O, Mackay EJ, Jordan MM (2009c) Modeling the impact of diesel vs. water overflush fluids on scale-squeeze-treatment lives using a two-phase near-wellbore simulator. SPE Prod Oper 24(3):473–480. https://doi.org/10.2118/114105-PA
Vazquez O et al (2013) Automatic isotherm derivation from field data for oilfield scale-inhibitor squeeze treatments. SPE J 18(03):563–574. https://doi.org/10.2118/154954-PA
Vazquez O et al (2016) Non-aqueous vs aqueous overflush scale inhibitor squeeze treatment in an oilfield offshore Norway. J Petrol Sci Eng 138:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.11.033
Vazquez O et al (2019) Automatic optimization of oilfield-scale-inhibitor squeeze treatments delivered by diving-support vessel. SPE J 24(01):60–70
Vazquez O et al (2020) Uncertainty quantification of pseudo-adsorption isotherm history matching. In: Society of Petroleum Engineers—SPE international oilfield scale conference and exhibition, OSS 2020
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vazquez, O. (2023). Optimisation of Oilfield Scale Inhibitor Squeeze Treatments. In: Modelling Oilfield Scale Squeeze Treatments . SpringerBriefs in Petroleum Geoscience & Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71852-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71852-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71851-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71852-1
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)