Time, Narrative and Culture

  • Mark Currie
Chapter
Part of the Teaching the New English book series (TENEEN)

Abstract

This chapter is about the experience of teaching narrative in the context of philosophical and social theories of time. Most critical writing about time and narrative is focused on the question of memory, but this chapter argues that expectation, anticipation and surprise are equally fruitful concepts for teaching narrative. It looks at the notion of ‘epochal temporality’, or the claim that different historical epochs have distinct and describable experiences of time, and asks what this might mean for an understanding of narrative time in the contemporary novel. It explores the idea that, in the historical present, there is a preoccupation with the unforeseeable, which differs significantly from predominant conceptions of time in the second half of the twentieth century. The chapter also aims to set out a range of useful narratological concepts, particularly related to the notion of narrative tense, which is useful for the description of time structures in so-called ‘epochal temporality’ and for the teaching of time experiments in contemporary fiction. The chapter is closely tied to a third-year undergraduate module in which students work on a range of modern novels.

Works Cited

  1. Amis, Martin. 2003. Time’s Arrow or the Nature of the Offence. London: Vintage. First published by Jonathan Cape (1999).Google Scholar
  2. Augustine. 1961. Confessions. Translated by R.S. Pine-Coffin. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  3. Badiou, Alain. 2006. Being and Event. Translated by Oliver Feltham. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  4. Barnes, Julian. 2011. The Sense of an Ending. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  5. Coetzee, J.M. 2005. Slow Man. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  6. Derrida, Jacques. 1998. Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression. Translated by Eric Prenowitz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Eagleton, Terry. 2011. Why Marx Was Right. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
  9. Genette, Gerard. 1980. Narrative Discourse. Translated by Jane Lewin. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Harvey, David. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Husserl, Edmund. 1964. The Phenomenology of Internal Time Consciousness. Translated by James Churchill. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ishiguro, Kazuo. 2006. Never Let Me Go. London and New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  13. Jameson, Frederic. 1991. Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  14. Meillassoux, Quentin. 2006. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  15. Morson, Gary Saul. 1994. Narrative and Freedom: The Shadows of Time. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ricoeur, Paul. 1985. Time and Narrative. Translated by Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Smith, Ali. 2002. Hotel World. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  18. Spark, Muriel. 1974. The Driver’s Seat. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  19. Stiegler, Bernard. 2010. Memory. In Critical Terms for Media Studies, ed. Mark B.N. Hansen and W.J.T. Mitchell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Swift, Graham. 2002. Waterland. London: Picador.Google Scholar
  21. Todorov, Tzvetan. 2000. The Typology of Detective Fiction. In Modern Criticism and Theory: A Reader, ed. D. Lodge and N. Wood, 2nd ed. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  22. Žižek, Slavoj. 2012. Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Currie
    • 1
  1. 1.Queen Mary UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations