Advertisement

Comparative Analysis of Biomedical Image Compression Using Oscillation Concept and Existing Methods

  • Satyawati S. MagarEmail author
  • Bhavani Sridharan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics book series (LNCVB, volume 28)

Abstract

Medical image compression has an important role in hospitals as they are moving towards filmless imaging and go completely digital. Medical imaging produces the great challenge of compression algorithms. While compressing the data to avoid diagnostic errors and yet have high compression rates for reduced storage and transmission time. In this paper, comparative analysis of biomedical image compression using oscillation concept & existing methods is done and we have achieved maximum compression ratio by using oscillation concept method. Other parameters like PSNR, MSE, MSSIM & Std. Deviation are also good as compared to existing methods.

Keywords

Oscillations concept PACS DCT DWT DFT Fractal compression CR PSNR MSE MSSIM Std. deviation 

References

  1. 1.
    Dragan, D., Ivetic, D.: A comprehensive quality evaluation system for PACS. Special Issue on ICIT 2009 Conference—Bioinformatics and Image, 4(3), 642–650 July 2009. ISSN 1992-8424Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shiwangi, S.K.: Analysis of image compression algorithm using DCT, DFT and DWT transform. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Softw. Eng. (IJARCSSE), 6(7) (2016). ISSN 2277-128xGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mathur, G., Mathur, R., Mathur M.R.: A comparative study of various lossy image compression techniques. In: ETRASCT, 14 Conference Proceedings on International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology (IJERT), pp. 165–169. ISSN: 2278-0181Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bhavani, S., Thanushkodi, K.: A novel fractal image coding for quasi lossless medical image compression. Eur. J. Sci. Res. 70(1), 88–97 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gupta, M., Amit Kumar Garg.: Analysis of image compression algorithm using DCT. Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. (IJERA) 2(1), 515–521 (2012). ISSN: 2248-9622Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beladgham, M.: Performance evaluation of DWT compared to DCT for compression of biomedical image. Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci. (IJMECS) 4, 9–15 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kumar, T., Kumar, R.: Medical image compression using hybrid techniques of DWT, DCT and huffman coding. Int. J. Innovative Res. Electr. Electron. Instrum. Control Eng. (IJIREEICE) 3(2) (2015). ISSN: 2321-2004Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Magar, S.S., Sridharan, B.: Innovative approach to biomedical image compression using oscillation concept. International Conference on Automotive Control and Dynamic Optimization Techniques (ICACDOT), IEEE Conference Publications-IEEE Xplore, pp. 124–128Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pandey, P.K., Singh, Y., Tripathi, S.: Image processing using principle component analysis. Int. J. Comput. Appl. (0975 – 8887), 15(4) (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chaudhary, R.N.: Waves and oscillations. New Edge International Publishers, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chaphman, S.: Matlab programming for engineers. Cengage Learning Publishers, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pinki, R.M.: Estimation of image quality under different distortions. Int. J. Eng. Comput. Sci. (IJECS) 5(7), 17291–17296 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saini, P.K., Singh, M.: Brain tumor detection in medical imaging using MATLAB. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. (IRJET) 2(2), 191–196 (2015). e-ISSN: 2395-0056Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG  2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ECEKarpagam Academy of Higher Education, Karpagam UniversityCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations