Governance, Public Interest, and Public Film Funding: An Integrative Theoretical Framework

Chapter
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)

Abstract

This chapter addresses film public funding through the lens of the governance perspective of public policy. More specifically, it is suggested to apply an integrative analytical framework for investigating social order and policy processes to the analysis of film funding policies. It integrates six dimensions of governance: ideology, institutions, level of policy activity , stakeholders , mechanisms of operation , and policy products . The chapter briefly reviews the literature on the governance of culture and film and discusses the extent to which the framework is suitable for effectively analyzing the governance of film. It is suggested that the six dimensions—and in particular the stakeholders and the level of policy activity dimensions—are the most relevant to the analysis of the culture and film sector.

Keywords

Dimensions of governance Film Funding Governance of culture Institutions Level of policy activity Media governance Public policy Regulation Stakeholders 

References

  1. Abbott, K. W., Levi-Faur, D., & Snidal, D. (2015). Intermediaries in regulatory governance. In SASE 27th Annual Conference. London: The London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
  2. Albornoz, L. A. (2016). The international fund for culture diversity: A new tool for cooperation in the audiovisual field. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 22(4), 553–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin, R., & Cave, M. (1999). Understanding regulation: Theory, strategy and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, C. (2001). Culture, policy and subsidiarity in the European Union: From symbolic identity to the governmentalisation of culture. Political Geography, 20(4), 405–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bjerkeland, I. (2015). The rise of the regions: Norwegian film policy and the new regional cinema. The Nordic Journal of Cultural Policy, 18(1), 125–142.Google Scholar
  6. Blom-Hansen, J. (2002). A ‘new institutional’ perspective on policy networks. Public Administration, 75(4), 669–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bondebjerg, I., & Novrup Redvall, E. (2015). Introduction: Mediated cultural encounters in Europe. In I. Bondebjerg, E. Novrup Redvall & A. Higson (Eds.), European cinema and television: Cultural policy and everyday life (pp. 1–22). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://www.palgraveconnect.com/pc/doifinder/10.1057/9781137356888.0004
  8. Börzel, T. A. (2010). Governance with/out government: False promises or flawed premises? (SFB-Governance Working Paper Series, No. 23). DFG Research Center (SFB) 700 Governance in Areas of Limited Statehood – New Modes of Governance? Berlin: FU Berlin.Google Scholar
  9. Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2010). Governance without a state: Can it work? Regulation and Governance, 4(2), 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Braman, S. (2006). Change of state: Information, policy, and power. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Breyer, S. (1998). Typical justifications for regulation. In R. Baldwin, C. Scott, & C. Hood (Eds.), A reader on regulation (pp. 59–92). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Christensen, J. G. (2011). Competing theories of regulatory governance: Reconsidering public interest theory of regulation. In L.-F. David (Ed.), Handbook on the politics of regulation (pp. 96–110). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  13. Croley, S. P. (2008). Regulation and public interest: The possibility of good regulatory government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. D’Haenens, L., Mansell, R., & Sarikakis, K. (2010). Editor’s introduction. Communication, Culture and Critique, 3(2), 131–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dickinson, M., & Harvey, S. (2005). Film policy in the United Kingdom: New labor at the movies. The Political Quarterly, 76(3), 420–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freedman, D. (2008). The politics of media policy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ginosar, A. (2013). Media governance: A conceptual framework or merely a buzz word? Communication Theory, 23(4), 356–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ginosar, A. (2014). Public interest institutionalism: A positive perspective on regulation. Administration and Society, 46(3), 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grabosky, P. (2013). Beyond responsive regulation: The expanding role of non-state actors in the regulatory process. Regulation and Governance, 7(1), 114–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grofman, B., & Feld, S. L. (1988). Rousseau’s general will: A condorcetian perspective. American Political Science Review, 82, 567–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hantke-Domas, M. (2003). The public interest theory of regulation: Non-existence or misinterpretation? European Journal of Law and Economics, 15(2), 165–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Héritier, A. (2002). New modes of governance in Europe: Policy making without legislating? (Political Science Series, 81). Wien: Institut für Höhere Studien. https://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/pol/pw_81.pdf
  23. Héritier, A., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2008). The shadow of hierarchy and new modes of governance. Journal of Public Policy, 28(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  24. Hesmondhalgh, D., & Pratt, A. C. (2005). Cultural industries and cultural policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 11(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Horwitz, R. B. (1989). The irony of regulatory reform: The deregulation of American telecommunications. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kelly, L. W. (2016). Professionalizing the British film industry: The UK Film Council and public support for film production. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 22(4), 648–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kersbergen, K., & Waarden, F. (2004). ‘Governance’ as a bridge between disciplines: Cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research, 43(2), 143–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim, J. (2003). The funding and distribution structure of the British film industry in the 1990s: Localization and commercialization of British cinema towards a global audience. Media, Culture and Society, 25, 405–413.Google Scholar
  29. Kong, L. (2004). The sociality of cultural industries: Hong Kong’s cultural policy and film industry. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 11(1), 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Levi-Faur, D. (2012). The Oxford handbook of governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marin, B., & Mayntz, R. (1991). Policy networks: Empirical evidence and theoretical consideration. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  32. Morgan, B., & Yeung, K. (2007). An introduction to law and regulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ogus, A. (2004). Whither the economic theory of regulation? What economic theory of regulation? In J. Jordana & D. Levi-Faur (Eds.), The politics of regulation (pp. 31–44). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  34. Paquet, G. (2003). Governance of culture: Words of caution. A paper presented at the Conference on accounting for culture: Examining the building blocks of cultural citizenship, November 13–15, 2003, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  35. Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (1998). Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Posner, R. A. (1974). Theories of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 5, 335–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pratt, A. C. (1997). Production values: From cultural industries to the governance of culture. Environment and Planning A, 29(11), 1911–1917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pratt, A. C. (2005). Cultural industries and public policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 11(1), 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Puppis, M. (2010). Media governance: A new concept for the analysis of media policy and regulation. Communication, Culture and Critique, 3(2), 134–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government 1. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Salvemini, S., & Delmestri, G. (2000). Governance in the movie industry. Alternatives to Hollywood? International Journal of Arts Management, 2, 59–73.Google Scholar
  42. Sand, S. (2016). Supporting ‘film cultural peripheries’? The dilemmas of regional film policy in Norway. International Journal of Cultural Policy.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2015.1128419
  43. Selwood, S. (2001). The UK cultural sector: Profile and policy issues. London, UK: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
  44. Treib, O., Bähr, H., & Falkner, G. (2007). Modes of governance: Towards a conceptual clarification. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Academic College of Yezreel ValleyEmek YezreelIsrael

Personalised recommendations