Advertisement

Diversifying Public Film Funding Policies in Latin America

  • Tamara L. Falicov
Chapter
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)

Abstract

State funding is arguably the most essential component in fostering a film industry in Latin America. This chapter examines the histories of various film institutes throughout the region to understand how these state-run funding bodies have diversified their roles and policy mechanisms throughout the region in order to help sustain national film industries. The state has been fundamental in enforcing laws to help foster national film industry growth through film institute programmes, support to the private sector via legislation and funding to film schools. Moreover, more recently, it has boosted its assistance in marketing and branding national cinema, along with its commitment to foster transnational exchange with the Ibero-American film finance fund, Programa Ibermedia. Methodologically, the research takes a historical and comparative approach to various state funding mechanisms, with an emphasis on the most established industries, Argentina, Brazil and Mexico. I argue that neoliberalism, or the shift from a state-funded system to a privately owned market economy, is not solely an economic policy but also a cultural one. As Latin American public film policies have turned neoliberalist, they have taken on branding and marketing policies as dominant ideology.

Keywords

Branding Cinema do Brasil CinemaChile Cinema Novo Co-productions FIDICINE EFICINE Embrafilme Film institutes Film funding in Latin America FOPROCINE Ibero-American Cinematic Production IMCINE INCAA Latin America Latin American film industries Marketing National cinema National film branding National film industries Neoliberal economic policy Argentina; New Cinema Law Programa Ibermedia Screen quota State support for film production Transnational cinema 

References

  1. Anonymous. (1993, January 6). Luis Puenzo habla. La Maga, p. 20.Google Scholar
  2. Aronczyk, M. (2013). Branding the nation: The global business of national identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bordat, E. (2010). Cine e identidad: un análisis de las políticas de fomento al cine en Argentina y en México en el siglo XX’ from the Independencias – Dependencias – Interdependencias, VI Congreso CEISAL 2010. France Conference, Toulouse, 30 June. http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00496199/en/
  4. Calistro, M. (1992). Aspectos del nuevo cine, 1957-1968. In J. M. Couselo, M. Calistro, & C. España (Eds.), Historia del cine argentino (pp. 109–138). Buenos Aires: Centro Editor de América Latina.Google Scholar
  5. Cavallo, A., & Maza, G. (2010). El novisimo cine chileno. Chile: Ediciones Uqbar.Google Scholar
  6. Centro de cine (Costa Rica). (2016, April 15). Centro de Cine abre convocatoria 2016 del Fondo para el Fomento Audiovisual y Cinematográfico el Fauno. http://www.centrodecine.go.cr/index.php/6-contenidos/temas-destacados/1244-centro-de-cine-abre-convocatoria-2016-del-fondo-para-el-fomento-audiovisual-y-cinematografico-el-fauno
  7. Dennison, S., & Shaw, L. (2004). Popular cinema in Brazil. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Díaz López, M. (2014). América siempre inédita: esbozo de las politíca cultural de las instituciones públicas cinematográficas españolas de ámbito nacional hacia América Latina. In O. Berrendo Pérez, J. A. Serrano Fernández, & E. Encinas Puebla (Eds.), Panorama audiovisual 2014. Madrid: Egeda. http://www.egeda.com/documentos/PANORAMA_AUDIOVISUAL_IBEROAMERICANO_2014_300dpi.pdf Google Scholar
  9. Duggan, L. (2003). The twilight of equality?: Neoliberalism, cultural politics, and the attack on equality. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Durón, H. (2010). New Central American Cinema (2001-2010). Dissertation thesis, University of Kansas. https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/handle/1808/14530
  11. Falicov, T. L. (2007a). Programa Ibermedia: Co-production and the cultural politics of constructing an Ibero-American audiovisual space. Special issue on media co-productions. Spectator, 27(2), 21–30.Google Scholar
  12. Falicov, T. L. (2007b). The Cinematic Tango: Contemporary Argentine Film. London: Wallflower Press (distributed by Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
  13. Falicov, T. L. (2013). Ibero-American co-production: Transnational cinema, Spain’s public relations venture or both? In S. Dennison (Ed.), Contemporary hispanic cinema: Interrogating the transnational in Spanish and Latin American Film (pp. 67–88). Woodbridge, UK: Tamesis.Google Scholar
  14. Fermin, Z. (2003). Personal Interview with the author, May 30, 2003.Google Scholar
  15. Getino, O. (2006). Cine Iberoamericano: los desafios del nuevo siglo. San Jose, Costa Rica: Veritas.Google Scholar
  16. Harvey, E. R. (2005). Politica y financiacion publica de la cinematografia. Madrid: Iberautor Promociones culturales.Google Scholar
  17. Higson, A. (2000). The limiting imagination of national cinema. In M. Hjort & S. MacKenzie (Eds.), Cinema and nation (pp. 63–74). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Hill, J. (1996). British film policy. In A. Moran (Ed.), Film policy: International, national, and regional perspectives (pp. 101–113). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Hinojosa Córdova, L. (2014). Economía política del cine mexicano: dos décadas de transformaciones. Revista Rae-IC (Revista de la asociacion espanola de investigacion de la comunicacion), 1(2). http://www.novosmedios.org/revista/index.php/AEICp/article/view/49/51
  20. Hopewell, J. (2009, March 7). Brazil Boosts Indie Film. The Rio Times. http://riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/rio-entertainment/brazil-boosts-indie-film/#
  21. IMCINE. (2014). Anuario Estadistico de Cine Mexicano. http://www.imcine.gob.mx/cine-mexicano/publicaciones/anuario-estadistico
  22. Johnson, R. (1995). The rise and fall of Brazilian Cinema, 1960-1990. In R. Johnson & R. Stam (Eds.), Brazilian cinema (expanded ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Maclaird, M. (2013). Aesthetics and politics in the Mexican Film Industry. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meleiro, A. (2013). Finance and co-productions in Brazil. In S. Dennison (Ed.), Contemporary Hispanic Cinema: Interrogating the transnational in Spanish and Latin American Film (pp. 181–204). Woodbridge, UK.Google Scholar
  25. Moreno Domínguez, J. M. (2008). Diversidad audiovisual e integración cultural: analizando el programa Ibermedia. Comunicacion y sociedad, 9. Guadalajara, Mexico. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0188-252X2008000100005
  26. Newbery, C. (2006, September 16). Argentina measure has legs. Variety. http://variety.com/2006/film/news/argentina-measure-has-legs-1117950184/
  27. Pinazza, N. (2013). The re-emergence of Brazilian Cinema: A brief history. In N. Pinazza & L. Beyman (Eds.), Directory of world cinema: Brazil (pp. 32–33). London: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
  28. Quartesan, A., Romis, M., & Lanzafame, F. (2007). Las industrias culturales en América Latina y el Caribe: Desafíos y oportunidades. Interamerican Development Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/handle/11319/5437?locale-attribute=en#sthash.jNBJzig2.dpuf
  29. Schnitman, J. (1984). Film industries in Latin America: Dependency and development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  30. Stock, A. M. (2009). On location in Cuba: Street filmmaking during times of transition. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Villanzana, L. (2009). Transnational financial structures in the cinema of Latin America: Programa Ibermedia in study. Berlin: VWM Verlag.Google Scholar
  32. Woo, K. (2006, May 19). Brazil launches new film Biz effort in Cannes. Indiewire. http://www.indiewire.com/ots/2006/05/cannes_06_marke_2.html
  33. Zullo-Ruiz, F. (2009). The ‘Cine Argentino’ brand: The politics of a geographical-cultural trademark. Paper Presented at the Geographical Imaginaries and Hispanic Film, November 4–6, Tulane University, New Orleans.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations