Advertisement

Supporting Film Distribution in Europe: Why Is Overcoming National Barriers so Difficult?

  • Tim Raats
  • Ilse Schooneknaep
  • Caroline Pauwels
Chapter
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)

Abstract

MEDIA and Eurimages are well-known supranational programs of the European Commission and the Council of Europe which aim at promoting the European film industry by encouraging the production and distribution of films and fostering cooperation between professionals. National film funds, however, still remain the most important mechanisms for supporting film in Europe. Typically, these funds prioritize support to film production over distribution in a national context. This chapter investigates the extent to which national support schemes have included measures to enable cross-border distribution, to what extent these support measures take the form of direct or indirect forms of support, and how differences in support mechanisms applied have been accentuated over time in the European Union. We find clear improvements of smaller nations in developing support mechanisms that target both domestic and cross-border distribution. Nevertheless, domestic production remains the dominant support focus of national film funds, with distribution support being restricted to promotion and marketing rather than substantial support for theaters, retailing, and online.

Keywords

Audiovisual policy toolkit Cultural policy toolkit Day-and-date release Distribution support Domestic market Non-national European productions Production Promotion Quota quickies Structural barriers Subsidies US blockbusters US majors 

References

  1. Bain, J. S. (1954). Conditions of entry and the emergence of monopoly. In E. H. Chamberlin (Ed.), Monopoly and competition and their regulation (pp. 215–241). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakker, G. (2005). The decline and fall of the European film industry: Sunk costs, market size, and market structure, 1890–1927. The Economic History Review, 58(2), 310–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergfelder, T. (2005). National, transnational, or supranational cinema? Rethinking European film studies. Media Culture and Society, 27(3), 315–331.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443705051746 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Betz, M. (2001). The name above the (sub)title: Internationalism, coproduction, and polyglot European art cinema. Camera Obscura, 16(1), 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Betz, M. (2009). Beyond the subtitle: Remapping European art cinema. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  6. Biltereyst, D., Pauwels, C., & De Vinck, S. (2007). Our policies keep on reinventing the past: An overview of EU policy-making in the audiovisual domain. In L. d’Haenens & F. Saeys (Eds.), Western broadcast models. Structure, conduct and performance (pp. 25–59). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  7. Bondebjerg, I., Novrup Redvall, E., & Higson, A. (2015). European cinema and television. Cultural policy and everyday life. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Broughton Micova, S. (2014). Transnational support and the role of PSB in cinematic audiovisual production in Europe. In Paper Presented at RIPE@2014 Public Service Media across Boundaries, August 27–29, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  9. Caves, R. E., & Porter, M. E. (1977). From entry barriers to mobility barriers: Conjectural decisions and contrived deterrence to new competition. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91(2), 241–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Council of Europe Film Policy Forum. (2008). Public policies for film: Challenges in a changing context. Background paper. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  11. Cunningham, S., & Silver, J. S. (2013). Screen distribution and the new King Kongs of the online world. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Danish Film Institute. (2017). Facts and figures. http://www.dfi.dk/facts
  13. De Vinck, S. (2014). The best defense is a good offense: Putting the European in European-level film support. In K. Donders, C. Pauwels, & J. Loisen (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of European Media policy (pp. 329–344). Palgrave: Basingstoke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Vinck, S., & Lindmark, S. (2012). Statistical, ecosystems and competitiveness analysis of the media and content industries: The film sector. Luxembourg: Joint Research Centre – Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.Google Scholar
  15. De Vinck, S., & Pauwels, C. (2015). Beyond borders in the digital era: Future-proofing European level film-support schemes. In I. Bondebjerg & E. Novrup Redvall (Eds.), European cinema and television: Cultural policy and everyday life (pp. 102–123). Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dibie, J.-N. (1992). Les méchanismes de financement du cinéma et de l’audiovisuel en Europe. Paris: Counseil de l’Europe/DIXIT.Google Scholar
  17. Donders, K., & Raats, T. (2015). Cultural diversity and state aids to public service media. In E. Psychogiopoulou (Ed.), Cultural governance and the European Union. Protecting and promoting cultural diversity in Europe (pp. 132–150). Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  18. Elsaesser, T. (2005). European cinema. Face to face with hollywood. Amsterdam: Amsterdam UniPress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. European Audiovisual Observatory. (2012). Public funding for film and audiovisual works in Europe. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.Google Scholar
  20. European Audiovisual Observatory. (2015). Focus Cannes – World film market trends 2015. Cannes: European Audiovisual Observatory.Google Scholar
  21. European Audiovisual Observatory. (2017). Yearbook 2016. Key trends. Strassbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.Google Scholar
  22. Everett, W. (Ed.). (1996). European identity in cinema. Exeter: Intellect.Google Scholar
  23. Ezra, E. (2004). European cinema. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fontaine, G. (Ed.). (2016). Yearbook 2015 – Key trends. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.Google Scholar
  25. Grant, P. S., & Wood, C. (2004). Blockbusters and trade wars. Popular culture in a globalized world. Vancouver: D & M Press.Google Scholar
  26. Grece, C. (Ed.). (2016). How do films circulate on VOD services and in cinemas in the European Union? Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.Google Scholar
  27. Gubbins, M. (2012). Digital revolution: Active audiences and fragmented consumption. In D. Iordanova & S. Cunningham (Eds.), Digital disruption: Cinema moves on-line (pp. 67–100). St Andrews: St Andrews Film Studies.Google Scholar
  28. Hallin, D. C. (2009). Comment: State size as a variable in comparative analysis. International Communication Gazette, 71(1–2), 101–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hannerz, U. (1992). Cultural complexity. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Harcourt, A. (2005). The European Union and the regulation of media markets. Manchester: University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hedling, O. (2013). An unintended effect of the introduction of the public support systems – Film policy, film support and the contemporary Scandinavian production landscape. The Nordic Journal of Cultural Policy/Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidskrift, 16(1), 90–104.Google Scholar
  32. Henning, V., & Alpar, A. (2005). Public aid mechanisms in feature film production: The EU MEDIA Plus Program. Media, Culture and Society, 27(2), 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Herold, A. (2010). European film policies in EU and international law: Culture and trade: Marriage or misalliance? Groningen, NL: Europa Law Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Hoskins, C., McFadyen, S., Finn, A., & Jackel, A. (1995). Film and television co-production. Evidence from Canadian-European experience. Communication, 10(2), 221–243.Google Scholar
  35. Humphreys, P., & Gibbons, T. (2011). Audiovisual regulation under pressure. Comparative cases from North America and Europe. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Jäckel, A. (2003). European film industries. London: Palgrave/British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  37. Jäckel, A. (2007). The inter/nationalism of French Film Policy. Modern & Contemporary France, 15(1), 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kerrigan, F., & Ozbilgin, M. (2004). Film marketing in Europe: Bridging the gap between policy and practice. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Market, 9(3), 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lange, A. (2017). Film distribution companies in Europe. Straßbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.Google Scholar
  40. Lange, A., & Westcott, T. (2004). Public funding for audiovisual works in Europe. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Lab.Google Scholar
  41. Lowe, G. F., & Nissen, C. S. (Eds.). (2010). Small among giants. Television broadcasting in smaller countries. Gothenburg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
  42. Mattelart, A. (2000). European film policy and the response to Hollywood. In J. Hill & P. C. Gibson (Eds.), World cinema: Critical approaches (pp. 94–101). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. McAffee, R. P., Mialon, H. M., & Williams, M. A. (2004). When are sunk costs barriers to entry? Entry barriers in economic and antitrust analysis. American Economic Review, 94(2), 461–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Olsberg-SPI. (2012). Building sustainable film businesses: The challenges for industry and government (An independent research report). London: Olsberg-SPI sponsored by Film I Väst, PACT and the Swedish Film Institute.Google Scholar
  45. Olsberg-SPI. (2014). The impact of fiscal incentives in Europe for film and audiovisual production. Study for Audiovisual Observatory. Strasbourg: Audiovisual Observatory.Google Scholar
  46. Pauwels, C. (1995). Cultuur en economie: de spanningsvelden van het communautair audiovisueel beleid. Een onderzoek naar de grenzen en mogelijkheden van een kwalitatief cultuur- en communicatiebeleid in een economisch geïntegreerd Europa. Een kritische analyse en prospectieve evaluatie aan de hand van het gevoerde Europees audiovisueel beleid. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels.Google Scholar
  47. Petrie, D. J., & Hjort, M. (Eds.). (2007). The cinema of small nations. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  49. Puppis, M. (2009). Media regulation in small states. International Communications Gazette, 71(1–2), 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Raats, T., Evens, T., & Ruelens, S. (2016). Challenges for sustaining local audiovisual ecosystems. Analysis of financing and production of domestic TV fiction in small media markets. Journal of Popular Television, 4(1), 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ramstad, G. O. (1997). A model for structural analysis of the media market. Journal of Media Economics, 10(3), 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sarikakis, K. (2007). Media and cultural policy in the European Union. Amsterdam, NL: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  53. Schooneknaep, I., & Pauwels, C. (2014). The European connection: Does the audiovisual support system MEDIA empower the cross border circulation of European audiovisual productions? In Paper Presented at the European Network for Cinema and Media Studies (NECS) 2014 Conference, Milano, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy, June 19–21.Google Scholar
  54. Sparrow, A. (2007). Film and television distribution and the internet. Hampshire: Gower Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  55. Straubhaar, J. D. (2003). Choosing national TV: Cultural capital, language, and cultural proximity in Brazil. In M. G. Elasmar (Ed.), The impact of international television: A paradigm shift (pp. 77–110). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
  56. Straubhaar, J. D. (2014). Mapping “global” in communication and media studies. In K. G. Wilkins, J. D. Straubhaar, & S. Kumar (Eds.), Global communication: New agendas in communication (pp. 10–34). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Talavera, J. (2016). Public financing for film and television content – The state of soft money in Europe. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.Google Scholar
  58. Trappel, J. (2011). Structure and dynamics: The television broadcasting industry in smaller countries. In G. F. Lowe & C. S. Nissen (Eds.), Small among giants. Television broadcasting in smaller countries (pp. 111–122). Gothenburg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
  59. Ulin, J. C. (2013). The business of media distribution: Monetizing film, TV, and video content in an online world. Abingdon: Focal Press.Google Scholar
  60. Vasconselos, A.-P. (1994). Report by the think tank on the audiovisual industry in Europe. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  61. Willems, G. (2010). Filmbeleid in Vlaanderen en Denemarken: een comparatieve analyse (A comparative analysis of contemporary film policy in Flanders and Denmark). Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap, 38(2), 172–186.Google Scholar
  62. Wood, M. (2007). Contemporary European Cinema. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
  63. Wutz, J., & Perez, V. (2014). Dissemination of European Cinema in the European Union and the internal market. Paris: Notre Europe-Jacques Delors Institute.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tim Raats
    • 1
  • Ilse Schooneknaep
    • 1
  • Caroline Pauwels
    • 2
  1. 1.Studies on Media, Innovation and Technology (imec-SMIT)Vrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselBelgium
  2. 2.Communication Sciences DepartmentVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselBelgium

Personalised recommendations