Advertisement

Why Study State Aid for Film? A Necessary Clarification

  • Paul Clemens Murschetz
  • Roland Teichmann
  • Matthias Karmasin
Chapter
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)

Abstract

“The economics of film determines its infrastructure—its foundations—and therefore its potential. The politics of film determines its structure, that is: the way it relates to the world”:

James Monaco (2009, p. 289)

“A movie is risky, but if the illusion of control convinces a manager that the risk can be controlled by putting a star in the movie, or adding special effects, or introducing a story line for broader appeal, or spending heavily on advertising, then we will get just the kind of movies we have today. But, the risks cannot be controlled; they are inherent in the very nature of the business.”

Arthur De Vany (2004, p. 270)

Keywords

Cultural economics Film economics Film financing Film policy Government support Media subsidies Public economics Media economics Movie economics Political economy of the media Public policy Public support State aid for film 

References

  1. Aubert, C., Bardhan, P., & Dayton-Johnson, J. (2001). Artfilms, handicrafts and other cultural goods: The case for subsidy. Berkeley: Department of Economics, UCB, UC. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/62n4f3bhGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2010). The Oxford handbook of regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bao, S., & Toivonen, M. (2015). Cultural and creative industries in China. Helsinki: VTT Technical Research Centre; Aalto University.Google Scholar
  4. Bator, F. M. (1958). The anatomy of market failure. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72, 351–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bondebjerg, I., Novrup Redvall, E., & Higson, A. (2015). European cinema and television. In Cultural policy and everyday life. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  6. Caves, R. E. (2000). Creative industries: Contracts between art and commerce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chisholm, D. C., Fernández-Blanco, V., Ravid, S. A., & Walls, W. D. (2015). Economics of motion pictures: The state of the art. Journal of Cultural Economics, 39(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Commission of the European Communities. (2012). State aid scoreboard update. Report on state aid granted by the EU member states, Brussels: COM (2012)778 final.Google Scholar
  9. Cowen, T., & Crampton, E. (2002). Market failure or success. In The new debate. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
  10. Crane, C. (2013). Cultural globalization and the dominance of the American film industry: Cultural policies, national film industries, and transnational film. International Journal of Cultural Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2013.832233
  11. Dal Bó, E. (2006). Regulatory capture. A review. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(2), 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Vany, A. (2004). Hollywood economics: How extreme uncertainty shapes the film industry. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. De Vany, A. (2006). The movie. In V. A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of art and culture (pp. 615–665). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Vinck, S. (2011). Revolutionary road: Looking back at the position of the European film sector and the results of European-level film support in view of their digital future. A critical assessment. Dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  15. Donders, K., Loisen, J., & Pauwels, C. (2014). Introduction: European media policy as a complex maze of actors, regulatory instruments and interests. In K. Donders, C. Pauwels, & J. Loisen (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of European media policy (pp. 1–16). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. European Audiovisual Observatory. (2014). The new cinema communication. IRIS plus 2014–1.Google Scholar
  17. European Audiovisual Observatory. (2017a). Focus, world film market trends (published by Marché du Film, Festival de Cannes).Google Scholar
  18. European Audiovisual Observatory. (2017b). Yearbook 2016 – Key trends. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.Google Scholar
  19. European Commission. (2014). European film in the digital era: Bridging cultural diversity and competitiveness. Final report, COM(2014)272F. Belgium: Brussels.Google Scholar
  20. Flew, T. (2013). Global creative industries. Cambridge, Malden: Polity.Google Scholar
  21. Fontaine, G. (2015, June 11). Current trends in public film support and perspectives on impact. Presentation at the Montenegro Presidency Workshop, Podgorica. http://www.obs.coe.int/documents/205595/506942/Fontaine+presentation+-+Podgorica+11+June+2015/2c0dfbf1-49a7-41f6-918e-7104b1813287
  22. Frey, B. S. (2011). Public support. In R. Towse (Ed.), A handbook of cultural economics (2nd ed., pp. 370–378). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Gehlbach, S., & Sonin, K. (2014). Government control of the media. Journal of Public Economics, 118, 163–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gubbins, M. (2012). Digital revolution: Active audiences and fragmented consumption. In D. Iordanova & S. Cunningham (Eds.), Digital disruption: Cinema moves on-line (pp. 67–100). St Andrews: St Andrews Film Studies.Google Scholar
  25. Heilbrun, J., & Gray, C. M. (2001). The Economics of Art and Culture: An American Perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hesmondhalgh, D. (2005). Cultural industries and cultural policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 11(11), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hesmondhalgh, D. (2012). The cultural industries (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Hjort, M. (2012). Film and risk. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hoskins, C., McFadyen, S., & Finn, A. (1997). Global television and film: An introduction to the economics of the business. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  30. Jordan, A. J., & Turnpenny, J. R. (2015). The tools of policy formulation. Actors, capacities, venues and effects. www.elgaronline.com/view/9781783477036.xml
  31. Kumb, F. (2014). Filmförderung und Subventionskontrolle in Deutschland. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kumb, F., Kunz, R., & Siegert, G. (2016). Research on the motion picture industry: State of the art and new directions off the beaten track away from theatrical release. Journal of Economic Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12145
  33. La Torre, M. (2014). The economics of the audiovisual industry: Financing TV, film and web. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378477.0012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lacy, S. (1992). The financial commitment approach to news media competition. Journal of Media Economics, 5(2), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lange, A., & Westcott, T. (2004). Public funding for film and audiovisual works in Europe – A comparative approach. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.Google Scholar
  36. Lee, M., & Jin, D. Y. (2017). Understanding the business of global media in the digital age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Litman, B. R. (2000). The structure of the film industry. In A. N. Greco (Ed.), The media and entertainment industries. Readings in mass communications (pp. 99–121). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  38. McDonald, P., & Wasko, J. (2007). The contemporary Hollywood film industry. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. McKenzie, J. (2012). The economics of movies: A literature survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(1), 42–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Miller, T. (2001). Global Hollywood. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  41. Miller, T. (2016). The new international division of cultural labor revisited. Journal of Communication and Emergent Technologies, 14(2), 97–121.Google Scholar
  42. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48, 261–297.Google Scholar
  43. Monaco, J. (2009). How to read a film: Movies, media, and beyond (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Moul, C. C. (2005). Movie industry economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. MPAA – Motion Picture Association of America. (2016). Theatrical market statistics 2016. http://www.mpaa.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/MPAA-Theatrical-Market-Statistics-2016_Final-1.pdf
  46. Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  47. Musgrave, R. A. (2008). Public finance. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics (2nd ed.). http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_P000244. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230226203.1363
  48. Musgrave, R. A., & Peacock, A. T. (1958). Classics in the theory of public finance. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Myers, S. C. (2000). The capital structure. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Newman-Baudais, S. (2011). Public funding for film and audiovisual works in Europe. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.Google Scholar
  51. Nielsen, R. K., & Linnebank, G. (2011). Public support for the media: A six-country overview of direct and indirect subsidies. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.Google Scholar
  52. Pareto, V. (1971 [1927])). Manual of Political Economy (1971 translation of 1927 edition). New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
  53. Peacock, A. (1969). Welfare economics and public subsidies to the arts. Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 4, 323–335.Google Scholar
  54. Peacock, A. (2006). The arts and economic policy. In V. A. Ginsburgh & D. Thorsby (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of art and culture (pp. 1123–1139). Amsterdam: North Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Peltzman, S. (1973). The effect of government subsidies-in-kind on private expenditures: The case of higher education. Journal of Political Economy, 81(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Peng, W. (2015). China, coproduction and soft power competition. Queensland University of Technology. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/91326/4/Weiying_Peng_Thesis.pdf
  57. Pfeffer, G., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  58. Picard, R. G. (2008). Subsidies for the media. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication (pp. 4891–4894). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  59. Pigou, A. C. (1932). The economics of welfare (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  60. Prat, A., & Strömberg, D. (2011). The political economy of mass media. London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  61. Price, M. E., Puppis, M., & Verhulst, S. G. (2013). Media policy and governance. Oxford Bibliographies Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199756841-0119
  62. Reder, M. W. (1982). Chicago economics: Permanence and change. Journal of Economic Literature, 20(1), 1–38.Google Scholar
  63. Richeri, G. (2016). Global film market, regional problems. Global Media and China, 1(4), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059436416681576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rosanvallon, P. (2016). Die gute Regierung. Hamburg: Verlag Hamburg Edition.Google Scholar
  65. Ross, T. W. (1988). On the relative efficiency of cash transfers and subsidies, Working Paper in Economics E-88-20. The Hoover Institution, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  66. Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Steenblik, R. P. (1990). A subsidy primer. http://www.globalsubsidies.org/subsidy-primer/ASubsidyPrimer.php
  68. Stigler, G. J. (1988). Chicago studies in political economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  69. Talavera Milla, J., Kanzler, M., & Fontaine, G. (2016). European audiovisual observatory. Public financing for film and audiovisual content – The state of soft money in Europe. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual observatory.Google Scholar
  70. Thom, M. (2016). Lights, camera, but no action? Tax and economic development lessons from state motion picture incentive programs. American Review of Public Administration. Online before print June 5, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016651958
  71. Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Throsby, D. (2010). The economics of cultural policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Towse, R. (2010). A textbook of cultural economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vogel, H. L. (2014). Entertainment industry economics (9th ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Clemens Murschetz
    • 1
  • Roland Teichmann
    • 2
  • Matthias Karmasin
    • 3
  1. 1.Alpen-Adria-UniversitätKlagenfurtAustria
  2. 2.Österreichisches FilminstitutViennaAustria
  3. 3.Media and Communication StudiesAlpen-Adria UniversitätKlagenfurtAustria

Personalised recommendations