Attempts on Her Life: A Postdramatic Learning Play?

  • Glenn D’Cruz
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter reads Martin Crimp’s play Attempts on Her Life (1997) as an exemplary instance of postdramatic writing by contextualising Crimp’s work by looking at its early critical reception and relationship to the era of ‘Cool Britannia’ and the so-called ‘In-Yer-Face’ movement. The chapter also interrogates the work’s gender politics by examining how it uses irony to deal with the (mis)representations of women within the so-called society of the spectacle. The final section of the chapter describes and analyses a range of pedagogical and political issues generated by a student production of the play I directed in 2003 with a focus on the way Rancière’s argument about educational equality can help us unpack the ethical dilemmas generated by teaching postdramatic theatre through practice.

References

  1. Agustí, Clara Escoda. 2005. ‘Short Circuits of Desire’: Language and Power in Martin Crimp’s Attempts on Her Life. Ariel 36 (3–4): 103–126.Google Scholar
  2. Allegue, Ludivine, Simon Jones, Baz Kershaw, and Angela Piccini. 2009. Practice-as-Research in Performance and Screen. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Angelaki, Vicky. 2012. The Plays of Martin Crimp: Making Theatre Strange. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Arnott, James. 1981. An Introduction to Theatrical Scholarship. Theatre Quarterly 10 (39): 29–42.Google Scholar
  5. Barnett, David. 2008. When Is a Play Not a Drama? Two Examples of Postdramatic Theatre Texts. New Theatre Quarterly 24 (1): 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrett, Estelle, and Barbara Bolt, eds. 2007. Practice as Research: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry. London and New York: I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd.Google Scholar
  7. Crimp, Martin. 1997. Attempts on Her Life. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2005. Martin Crimp Plays 2. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 2007. Interview with Martin Crimp. In National Theatre Education Background Pack. London: The Royal National Theatre Board. http://d1wf8hd6ovssje.cloudfront.net/documents/Attempts_bkpk.pdf.Google Scholar
  10. Debord, Guy. 1995 (1967). The Society of the Spectacle. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  11. Freeman, John. 2010. Blood, Sweat & Theory: Research Through Practice in Performance. Faringdon: Libri.Google Scholar
  12. Frow, John. 2013. Practice of Value: Essays on Literature in Cultural Studies. Crawley: UWAP Scholarly.Google Scholar
  13. Fuchs, Elinor. 1996. The Death of Character: Perspectives on Theater After Modernism. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hay, Chris. 2016. Knowledge, Creativity and Failure: A New Pedagogical Framework for Creative Arts. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hutcheon, Linda. 1989. The Politics of Postmodernism. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jürs-Munby, Karen, Jerome Carroll, and Steve Giles, eds. 2013. Postdramatic Theatre and the Political: International Perspectives on Contemporary Performance. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  17. Lehmann, Hans-Thies. 2006. Postdramatic Theatre. Translated and with an introduction by Karen Jürs-Munby. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Luckhurst, Mary. 2003. Political Point-Scoring: Martin Crimp’s Attempts on Her Life. Contemporary Theatre Review 13 (1): 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rai, Shirin M., and Janelle Reinelt. 2015. The Grammar of Politics and Performance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Rancière, Jacques. 1991. The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation. Translated, with an Introduction, by Kristin Ross. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2007. The Emancipated Spectator. Artforum 45 (March): 271–280.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2009. The Emancipated Spectator. Translated by Gregory Elliot. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  23. Sierz, Aleks. 2000. In-Yer-Face Theatre: British Drama Today. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 2013. The Theatre of Martin Crimp: Second Edition. Critical Companions. London: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama.Google Scholar
  25. Sugiera, Malgorzata. 2004. Beyond Drama: Writing for Postdramatic Theatre. Theatre Research International 29 (1): 6–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Theatre West End. 1997. Time Out, March 5–12, no. 1385.Google Scholar
  27. The Royal Court Theatre. 2017. About Us. https://royalcourttheatre.com/about/
  28. Wangh, Stephen. 2013. The Heart of Teaching. London and. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Weiler, Christel. 1988. Theatre and University: The Gießen Model. Translated by Hector Maclean (1992). Theater Heute 12 (88): 42–43.Google Scholar
  30. Wright, Elizabeth. 1989. Post-Modern Brecht: A Re-Presentation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Zimmerman, Heiner. 2003. Images of Woman in Martin Crimp’s Attempts on Her Life. European Journal of English Studies 7 (1): 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glenn D’Cruz
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Communication & Creative ArtDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations