John Laws/Sade: Postmodern or Postdramatic?

  • Glenn D’Cruz
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter introduces the concept of postdramatic theatre by offering two readings of The Sydney Front’s 1987 production John Laws/Sade. Initially described as a work of postmodern performance, the work displays many of the features Lehmann identifies with postdramatic theatre. It examines the similarities and differences between the vocabularies of postmodern theatre and postdramatic theatre as they are used to describe and redescribe John Laws/Sade, respectively. The chapter pays particular attention to the relationship between postdramatic theatre and the tradition of twentieth-century avant-garde drama in Europe by identifying the ways that Péter Szondi’s book Theory of Modern Drama informs Lehmann’s concept of the postdramatic. The chapter concludes with an account of the ethical perils generated by teaching avant-garde performance through practice.

References

  1. Artaud, Antonin. 1958. The Theater and Its Double. Translated by Mary Caroline Richards. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 1974. The Theatre and Its Double. In Collected Works, translated by Victor Corti, vol. 4. London: Calder & Boyars.Google Scholar
  3. Auslander, Philip. 2002. From Acting to Performance: Essays in Modernism and Postmodernism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Baudrillard, Jean. 1983. Simulations. Translated by Paul Foss, Paul Patton, and Philip Beitchman. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  5. Birringer, Johannes. 1991. Theatre, Theory, Postmodernism. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Carlson, Marvin. 1996. Performance: A Critical Introduction. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Connor, Steven. 1989. Postmodernist Culture: An Introduction to Theories of the Contemporary. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Derrida, Jacques. 1978. The Theater of Cruelty and the Closure of Representation. In Writing and Difference, 292–316. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, Michel. 1988. Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. Translated by Richard Howard. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  10. Frow, John. 1991. What Was Postmodernism? Sydney: Local Consumption Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Fuchs, Elinor. 1996. The Death of Character: Perspectives on Theater after Modernism. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodall, Jane. 1994. Artaud and the Gnostic Drama. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Grant, Clare. 2012. Staging the Audience: The Sydney Front 1986–1993. Melbourne: Contemporary Arts Media.Google Scholar
  14. Habermas, Jürgen. 1983. Modernity—An Incomplete Project. In The Anti-aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture, ed. Hal Foster, 3–15. Seattle: Bay Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hamilton, Margaret. 2008. Postdramatic Theatre and Australia: A ‘New’ Theatre Discourse. Australasian Drama Studies 52: 3–23.Google Scholar
  16. Hays, Michael. 1983. Drama and Dramatic Theory: Péter Szondi and the Modern Theater. Boundary 2 (11): 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heuvel, Michael Vanden. 2001. “Is Postmodernism?” Stoppard Amongst/Against the Postmoderns. In The Cambridge Companion to Tom Stoppard, ed. Katherine E. Kelly, 213–228. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hutcheon, Linda. 1989. The Politics of Postmodernism. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jameson, Fredric. 1998. Postmodernism and Consumer Society. In The Cultural Turn. Essays on the Postmodern 1983–1998, 111–125, 1–20. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  20. Jürs-Munby, Karen. 2006. Translator’s Introduction to Postdramatic Theatre, 1–15. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Jürs-Munby, Karen, Jerome Carroll, and Steve Giles, eds. 2013. Postdramatic Theatre and the Political: International Perspectives on Contemporary Performance. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  22. Kaye, Nick. 1994. Postmodernism and Performance. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirby, Alan. 2006. The Death of Postmodernism and Beyond. Philosophy Now, 34–37, November/December.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 2009. Digimodernism: How New Technologies Dismantle the Postmodern and Reconfigure Our Culture. New York and London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  25. The Ladies Lounge. 1997. Presented by Judith Lucy and Helen Razer. Triple J, ABC Australia, broadcast date unknown.Google Scholar
  26. Lehmann, Hans-Thies. 2006. Postdramatic Theatre. Translated and with an introduction by Karen Jürs-Munby. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Lyotard, Jean-François. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Translated by Geoffrey Bennington and Brian Massumi. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  28. Nealon, Jeffrey. 2012. Post-Postmodernism: or, The Cultural Logic of Just-in-Time Capitalism. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Pavis, Patrice. 1992. Theatre at the Crossroads of Culture. Translated by Loren Kruger. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Poggioli, Renato. 1968. The Theory of the Avant-Garde. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Rorty, Richard. 1984. Habermas and Lyotard on Post-Modernity. Praxis International 4 (1): 32–44.Google Scholar
  32. Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schaefer, Kerrie. 1999. The Politics of Poaching in Postmodern Performance: A Case Study of the Sydney Front’s Don Juan in Rehearsal and Performance. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
  34. Spiderman. 2002. DVD. Directed by Sam Raimi. Los Angeles: Columbia Pictures.Google Scholar
  35. Szondi, Péter. 1987. Theory of the Modern Drama. Edited and translated by Michael Hays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  36. Waites, James. 1991. Treading a Fine Line. The Sydney Front and Don Juan: Exploring the Actor-Audience Nexus. The Sydney Review (April): 6–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glenn D’Cruz
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Communication & Creative ArtDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations