Advertisement

Introduction

  • Anna Serra-Llobet
  • G. Mathias Kondolf
  • Kathleen Schaefer
  • Scott Nicholson
Chapter

Abstract

Managing flood risk instead of ‘controlling floods’ is a key change in approach for managing floods and floodplains. In the context of floods, hazard refers to the magnitude or height of a given flood and its probability of occurring. Vulnerability refers to the social assets exposed to damage from flooding. Risk combines both hazard and vulnerability. Thus managing flood risk implies making interventions at all points of the flood risk cycle, including not only structural measures to reduce flood magnitude or frequency (reducing hazard) but also land-use planning (to reduce assets exposed), early warning systems, insurance, and acting within the context of multiple objectives. Recent experiences in implementing flood risk management along large floodplain rivers and smaller urban streams in America and Europe manifest a wide range of environmental and institutional settings, and thus opportunities and constraints unique to each setting.

Keywords

Flood risk management Flood control Large floodplain rivers Urban rivers 

References

  1. Gallopin, G.C. 2006. Linkages Between Vulnerability, Resilience, and Adaptive Capacity. Global Environmental Change 16: 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Keenan-Jones, D. 2013. Large-Scale Water Management Projects in Central-Southern Italy. In The Ancient Mediterranean Environment Between Science and History, ed. W.V. Harris, 233–258. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Mays, L.W. 2010. A Brief History of Water Technology During Antiquity: Before the Romans. In Ancient Water Technologies, ed. L.W. May, 1–28. Dordrecht/London: Springer Science and Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Merz, B., J. Hall, M. Disse, and A. Schumann. 2010. Fluvial Flood Risk Management in a Changing World. Natural Hazards and Earth Systems Sciences 10: 509–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Plate, E.J. 2002. Flood Risk and Flood Management. Journal of Hydrology 267: 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Sayers, P., Y. Li, G. Galloway, E. Penning-Rowsell, F. Shen, K. Wen, Y. Chen, and T. Le Quesne. 2013. Flood Risk Management: A Strategic Approach. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  7. Serra-Llobet, A., E. Conrad, and K. Schaefer. 2016. Governing for Integrated Water and Flood Risk Management: Comparing Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches in Spain and California. Water 8: 445. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8100445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Tobin, G.A. 1995. The Levee Love Affair: A Stormy Relationship. Water Resources Bulletin 31: 359–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Serra-Llobet
    • 1
    • 2
  • G. Mathias Kondolf
    • 1
    • 3
  • Kathleen Schaefer
    • 1
    • 4
  • Scott Nicholson
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.University of California BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Aix-Marseille UniversityMarseilleFrance
  3. 3.University of LyonLyonFrance
  4. 4.Federal Emergency Management AgencyOaklandUSA
  5. 5.US Army Corps of EngineersWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations