Skip to main content

Institutional Agency and Path Creation

Institutional Path from Industrial to Knowledge City

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter argues for the need to focus more explicitly on institutions and the related agency to gain a better understanding of the relationship between micro and macro levels and thus of path creation. The core concepts related to path creation and institutional agency are investigated. The research question is: What are the main institutional strategies adopted by intentional actors, independently or in collaboration, in their efforts to boost institutional path creation and renewal? This question is scrutinized in the context of a knowledge-city development and use Tampere, Finland as a case in point. The analysis reveals that the early stages of new path creation can be explained by both institutional factors and/or the strong entrepreneurial agency It also highlights the crucial role of the institutional agency shaping the rules of the game and the playing field for industry-oriented efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We express our gratitude to Nina Mustikkamäki and Tuomo Heinonen, who conducted 52 interviews.

  2. 2.

    Finland was a part of Sweden until 1809 and after that, an autonomous grand duchy of Russia until 1917.

References

  • Ahonen, P. (1993). Tampereen teknillisen korkeakoulun synty [The birth of Tampere University of Techonology]. In Tekniikan Tampere. Tampereen teknillinen seura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3, 65–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benneworth, P. (2007). Leading innovation: Building effective regional coalitions for innovation. Research report. London: Nesta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R. (2017). Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: A research agenda. Regional Studies, 51(3), 351–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2006). Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 273–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R., & Martin, R. (2010). The aims and scope of evolutionary economic geography. In R. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 3–39). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brömmelstroet, M. T., & Schrijnen, P. M. (2010). From planning support systems to mediated planning support: A structured dialogue to overcome the implementation gap. Environment and Planning B: Planning Design, 37(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrillo, F. J., Yititcanlar, T., García, B., & Lönnqvist, A. (2014). Knowledge and the city: Concepts, applications and trends of knowledge-based urban development. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawley, S. (2014). Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development. Economic Geography, 90(1), 91–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djelic, M.-L., & Quack, S. (2007). Overcoming path dependency: Path generation in open systems. Theory and Society, 36(2), 161–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drori, I., & Landau, D. (2011). Vision and change in institutional entrepreneurship. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? The American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2001). Path dependence and creation. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., & Karnøe, P. (2010). Path dependency or path creation? Journal of Management Studies, 47, 760–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, M. S. (2010). Rules of the game: The place of institutions in regional economic change. Regional Studies, 44(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grillitsch, M. (2016). Institutions, smart specialisation dynamics and policy. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 34(1), 22–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häikiö, M. (2015). Tampereen teknillisen yliopiston historia 1965–2015 [History of the Tampere University of Technology 1965–2015]. Kirjokansi, 97, Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassi, O. (1993). Tampereen teknillinen korkeakoulu vuosina 1975–1992 [Tampere University of Technology in 1975–1992]. In Tekniikan Tampere. Tampereen teknillinen seura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmen, A. K. T., & Fosse, J. K. (2017). Regional agency and constitution of new paths: A study of agency in early formation of new paths on the west coast of Norway. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 498–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaksen, A. (2015). Industrial development in thin regions: Trapped in path extension? Journal of Economic Geography, 15(3), 585–600. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jepperson, R. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaarninen, M. (2000). Murros ja mielikuva. Tampereen yliopisto 1960–2000 [Period of transition and image: University of Tampere 1960–2000]. Tampere: Tampereen yliopisto & Vastapaino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostiainen, J., & Sotarauta, M. (2003). Great leap or long march to knowledge economy: Institutions, actors and resources in the development of Tampere, Finland. European Planning Studies, 10(5), 415–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemola, T. (2016). Finland: Building the base for telecom breakthrough. A paper presented in “Industrial Policy for New Growth Areas and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems”. Helsinki 28–29, November 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social sciences. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnamaa, R. (2002). Development process of the ICT cluster in the Jyväskylä urban region. In M. Sotarauta, H. Bruun (Eds.), Nordic perspectives on process-based regional development policy. Nordregio report 2002:3, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Männistö, J. (2002). Voluntaristinen alueellinen innovaatiojärjestelmä: Tapaustutkimus Oulun ict-klusterista [A voluntaristic regional innovation system: The ICT cluster in the Oulu area]. Acta universitatis lappoensis 46. Rovaniemi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. (2000). Institutional approaches to economic geography. In T. Barnes & M. Sheppard (Eds.), A companion to economic geography (pp. 77–94). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. (2010). Roepke lecture in economic geography—rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography, 86, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato, M. (2014). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs private sector myths. London: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen, R. (2002). National innovation system: Scientific concept or political rhetoric. Helsinki: Edita.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 31, 491–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1991). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, M., Meegan, R., Karecha, J., Evans, R., Jones, G., Sotarauta, M., et al. (2012). Second tier cities in Europe: In an age of austerity why invest beyond the capitals? Liverpool: Liverpool John Moores University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelkonen, A. (2008). The Finnish competition state and entrepreneurial policies in the Helsinki region. Research reports no. 254, Helsinki University Print. University of Helsinki, Department of Sociology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafiqui, P. (2009). Evolving economic landscapes: Why new institutional economics matters for economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(3), 329–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasila, V. (1988). Markkinapaikasta tehdaskaupungiksi [From market place to industrial city]. In Tampereen historia I. Tampereen kaupunki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritvala, T. Y., & Kleymann, B. (2012). Scientists as midwives to cluster emergence: An institutional work framework. Industry and Innovation, 19, 477–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romanainen, J. (2001). The cluster approach in Finnish technology policy. In Innovative clusters: Drivers of national innovation systems (pp. 377–388). Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seppälä, R. (1998). Hyökkäävä puolustaja. Maakunnan selviytymistaistelu ja Tampereen Kauppakamari 1918–1998 [Offensive defender: Regional fight for survival and Tampere Chamber of Commerce 1918–1998]. Otava, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmie, J. (2012). Path dependence and new technological path creation in the Danish wind power industry. European Planning Studies, 20, 753–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotarauta, M. (2016). Leadership and the city: Power, strategy and networks in the making of knowledge cities. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotarauta, M. (2017). An actor-centric bottom-up view of institutions: Combinatorial knowledge dynamics through the eyes of institutional entrepreneurs and institutional navigators. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 35(4), 584–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotarauta, M., & Heinonen, T. (2016). The Triple Helix model and the competence set: Human spare parts industry under scrutiny. Triple Helix, 3(8), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotarauta, M., & Mustikkamäki, N. (2015). Institutional entrepreneurship, power, and knowledge in innovation systems: Institutionalization of regenerative medicine in Tampere, Finland. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(2), 342–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotarauta, M., & Pulkkinen, R.-L. (2011). Institutional entrepreneurship for knowledge regions: In search of a fresh set of questions for regional innovation studies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29, 96–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotarauta, M., Heinonen, T., Sorvisto, P., & Kolehmainen, J. (Eds.) (2016). Innovation ecosystems, competencies and leadership: Human spare parts and venture finance ecosystems under scrutiny. Tekes review 329/2016. Tekes, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Finland. PX-Web Database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 1–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suvinen, N. (2014). Individual actors building an innovation network. In R. Rutten, P. Benneworth, D. Irawati, & F. Boekema (Eds.), The social dynamics of innovation networks (pp. 140–156). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirronen, J. (2005). Modernin yliopistokoulutuksen lähtökohdat ja sivistyskäsitys. Kuopion yliopiston julkaisuja E. Yhteiskuntatieteet 122. Kuopio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacklin, M. (1995). Lainahöyhenissä kohti teknopolista. Kronikka 30-vuotiaan TTKK:n vaiheista [In borrowed plumes towards technopole: 30 years chronicle of Tampere University of Techology]. Tampereen teknillinen korkeakoulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 361–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weik, E. (2011). Institutional entrepreneurship and agency. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(4), 466–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

With this piece of writing colleagues from Tampere, Finland wish to congratulate Björn on his birthday, and especially appreciate his longstanding contribution to the field and warm friendship. As a highly-cited scholar Björn is used to seeing his name in the list of references. As a token of appreciation, we decided not to cite Björn’s work in this chapter, and thus provide him with a rare opportunity to see a scholarly piece without his name.

The authors are grateful to Kevin Morgan and Jon P. Knudsen for very constructive and useful pieces of advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markku Sotarauta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sotarauta, M., Suvinen, N. (2018). Institutional Agency and Path Creation. In: Isaksen, A., Martin, R., Trippl, M. (eds) New Avenues for Regional Innovation Systems - Theoretical Advances, Empirical Cases and Policy Lessons. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71661-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics