Abstract
This chapter argues for the need to focus more explicitly on institutions and the related agency to gain a better understanding of the relationship between micro and macro levels and thus of path creation. The core concepts related to path creation and institutional agency are investigated. The research question is: What are the main institutional strategies adopted by intentional actors, independently or in collaboration, in their efforts to boost institutional path creation and renewal? This question is scrutinized in the context of a knowledge-city development and use Tampere, Finland as a case in point. The analysis reveals that the early stages of new path creation can be explained by both institutional factors and/or the strong entrepreneurial agency It also highlights the crucial role of the institutional agency shaping the rules of the game and the playing field for industry-oriented efforts.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
We express our gratitude to Nina Mustikkamäki and Tuomo Heinonen, who conducted 52 interviews.
- 2.
Finland was a part of Sweden until 1809 and after that, an autonomous grand duchy of Russia until 1917.
References
Ahonen, P. (1993). Tampereen teknillisen korkeakoulun synty [The birth of Tampere University of Techonology]. In Tekniikan Tampere. Tampereen teknillinen seura.
Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3, 65–107.
Benneworth, P. (2007). Leading innovation: Building effective regional coalitions for innovation. Research report. London: Nesta.
Boschma, R. (2017). Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: A research agenda. Regional Studies, 51(3), 351–364.
Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2006). Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 273–303.
Boschma, R., & Martin, R. (2010). The aims and scope of evolutionary economic geography. In R. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 3–39). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Brömmelstroet, M. T., & Schrijnen, P. M. (2010). From planning support systems to mediated planning support: A structured dialogue to overcome the implementation gap. Environment and Planning B: Planning Design, 37(1), 3–20.
Carrillo, F. J., Yititcanlar, T., García, B., & Lönnqvist, A. (2014). Knowledge and the city: Concepts, applications and trends of knowledge-based urban development. Abingdon: Routledge.
Dawley, S. (2014). Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development. Economic Geography, 90(1), 91–112.
Djelic, M.-L., & Quack, S. (2007). Overcoming path dependency: Path generation in open systems. Theory and Society, 36(2), 161–186.
Drori, I., & Landau, D. (2011). Vision and change in institutional entrepreneurship. New York: Berghahn Books.
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? The American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1032.
Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2001). Path dependence and creation. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., & Karnøe, P. (2010). Path dependency or path creation? Journal of Management Studies, 47, 760–774.
Gertler, M. S. (2010). Rules of the game: The place of institutions in regional economic change. Regional Studies, 44(1), 1–15.
Grillitsch, M. (2016). Institutions, smart specialisation dynamics and policy. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 34(1), 22–37.
Häikiö, M. (2015). Tampereen teknillisen yliopiston historia 1965–2015 [History of the Tampere University of Technology 1965–2015]. Kirjokansi, 97, Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
Hassi, O. (1993). Tampereen teknillinen korkeakoulu vuosina 1975–1992 [Tampere University of Technology in 1975–1992]. In Tekniikan Tampere. Tampereen teknillinen seura.
Holmen, A. K. T., & Fosse, J. K. (2017). Regional agency and constitution of new paths: A study of agency in early formation of new paths on the west coast of Norway. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 498–515.
Isaksen, A. (2015). Industrial development in thin regions: Trapped in path extension? Journal of Economic Geography, 15(3), 585–600. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu026
Jepperson, R. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kaarninen, M. (2000). Murros ja mielikuva. Tampereen yliopisto 1960–2000 [Period of transition and image: University of Tampere 1960–2000]. Tampere: Tampereen yliopisto & Vastapaino.
Kostiainen, J., & Sotarauta, M. (2003). Great leap or long march to knowledge economy: Institutions, actors and resources in the development of Tampere, Finland. European Planning Studies, 10(5), 415–438.
Lemola, T. (2016). Finland: Building the base for telecom breakthrough. A paper presented in “Industrial Policy for New Growth Areas and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems”. Helsinki 28–29, November 2016.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social sciences. New York: Harper and Row.
Linnamaa, R. (2002). Development process of the ICT cluster in the Jyväskylä urban region. In M. Sotarauta, H. Bruun (Eds.), Nordic perspectives on process-based regional development policy. Nordregio report 2002:3, Stockholm.
Männistö, J. (2002). Voluntaristinen alueellinen innovaatiojärjestelmä: Tapaustutkimus Oulun ict-klusterista [A voluntaristic regional innovation system: The ICT cluster in the Oulu area]. Acta universitatis lappoensis 46. Rovaniemi.
Martin, R. (2000). Institutional approaches to economic geography. In T. Barnes & M. Sheppard (Eds.), A companion to economic geography (pp. 77–94). Oxford: Blackwell.
Martin, R. (2010). Roepke lecture in economic geography—rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography, 86, 1–27.
Mazzucato, M. (2014). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs private sector myths. London: Anthem Press.
Miettinen, R. (2002). National innovation system: Scientific concept or political rhetoric. Helsinki: Edita.
Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 31, 491–503.
North, D. C. (1991). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parkinson, M., Meegan, R., Karecha, J., Evans, R., Jones, G., Sotarauta, M., et al. (2012). Second tier cities in Europe: In an age of austerity why invest beyond the capitals? Liverpool: Liverpool John Moores University.
Pelkonen, A. (2008). The Finnish competition state and entrepreneurial policies in the Helsinki region. Research reports no. 254, Helsinki University Print. University of Helsinki, Department of Sociology.
Rafiqui, P. (2009). Evolving economic landscapes: Why new institutional economics matters for economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(3), 329–353.
Rasila, V. (1988). Markkinapaikasta tehdaskaupungiksi [From market place to industrial city]. In Tampereen historia I. Tampereen kaupunki.
Ritvala, T. Y., & Kleymann, B. (2012). Scientists as midwives to cluster emergence: An institutional work framework. Industry and Innovation, 19, 477–497.
Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034–1047.
Romanainen, J. (2001). The cluster approach in Finnish technology policy. In Innovative clusters: Drivers of national innovation systems (pp. 377–388). Paris: OECD.
Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Seppälä, R. (1998). Hyökkäävä puolustaja. Maakunnan selviytymistaistelu ja Tampereen Kauppakamari 1918–1998 [Offensive defender: Regional fight for survival and Tampere Chamber of Commerce 1918–1998]. Otava, Helsinki.
Simmie, J. (2012). Path dependence and new technological path creation in the Danish wind power industry. European Planning Studies, 20, 753–772.
Sotarauta, M. (2016). Leadership and the city: Power, strategy and networks in the making of knowledge cities. Abingdon: Routledge.
Sotarauta, M. (2017). An actor-centric bottom-up view of institutions: Combinatorial knowledge dynamics through the eyes of institutional entrepreneurs and institutional navigators. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 35(4), 584–599.
Sotarauta, M., & Heinonen, T. (2016). The Triple Helix model and the competence set: Human spare parts industry under scrutiny. Triple Helix, 3(8), 1–20.
Sotarauta, M., & Mustikkamäki, N. (2015). Institutional entrepreneurship, power, and knowledge in innovation systems: Institutionalization of regenerative medicine in Tampere, Finland. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(2), 342–357.
Sotarauta, M., & Pulkkinen, R.-L. (2011). Institutional entrepreneurship for knowledge regions: In search of a fresh set of questions for regional innovation studies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29, 96–112.
Sotarauta, M., Heinonen, T., Sorvisto, P., & Kolehmainen, J. (Eds.) (2016). Innovation ecosystems, competencies and leadership: Human spare parts and venture finance ecosystems under scrutiny. Tekes review 329/2016. Tekes, Helsinki.
Statistics Finland. PX-Web Database.
Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 1–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Suvinen, N. (2014). Individual actors building an innovation network. In R. Rutten, P. Benneworth, D. Irawati, & F. Boekema (Eds.), The social dynamics of innovation networks (pp. 140–156). Abingdon: Routledge.
Tirronen, J. (2005). Modernin yliopistokoulutuksen lähtökohdat ja sivistyskäsitys. Kuopion yliopiston julkaisuja E. Yhteiskuntatieteet 122. Kuopio.
Wacklin, M. (1995). Lainahöyhenissä kohti teknopolista. Kronikka 30-vuotiaan TTKK:n vaiheista [In borrowed plumes towards technopole: 30 years chronicle of Tampere University of Techology]. Tampereen teknillinen korkeakoulu.
Weick, K. E., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 361–386.
Weik, E. (2011). Institutional entrepreneurship and agency. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(4), 466–481.
Acknowledgments
With this piece of writing colleagues from Tampere, Finland wish to congratulate Björn on his birthday, and especially appreciate his longstanding contribution to the field and warm friendship. As a highly-cited scholar Björn is used to seeing his name in the list of references. As a token of appreciation, we decided not to cite Björn’s work in this chapter, and thus provide him with a rare opportunity to see a scholarly piece without his name.
The authors are grateful to Kevin Morgan and Jon P. Knudsen for very constructive and useful pieces of advice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sotarauta, M., Suvinen, N. (2018). Institutional Agency and Path Creation. In: Isaksen, A., Martin, R., Trippl, M. (eds) New Avenues for Regional Innovation Systems - Theoretical Advances, Empirical Cases and Policy Lessons. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71661-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71661-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71660-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71661-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)