Skip to main content

Lesbian Gay Bi-sexual Transgender (LGBT) Personnel: A Military Challenge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of the Sociology of the Military

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

In recent decades, LGBT inclusion in the military has increased rapidly, with many countries eliminating bans against the LGBT service. The Armed Forces interact with the values of the societies they serve and the so-called “power of identity” does not exclude the armed forces. So LGBT people want to exert their right to enter any position in the military. These changes have raised questions on the suitability of LGBT people to serve and on the effects of their service on the armed forces. Without neglecting a historical overview, this chapter discusses some aspects connected with LGBT issues in military life: the effects of their presence on the effectiveness and on the high standards of morale and duty, good order and discipline, loyalty and cohesion. The chapter also underlines how full military inclusion for transgender service members hasn’t been accomplished yet and how a number of prejudices and forms of LGBT-phobia still exist today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In use since the 1990s, the term LGBT (enlargement of the initialism LGB) has become mainstream as a self-designation and has been adopted by the majority of sexuality and gender identity based community centers and media in the United States and some other English-speaking countries. The initialism LGBT is intended to emphasize a diversity of sexuality and gender identity-based cultures. And is sometimes used to refer to anyone who is non-heterosexual or non-cisgender instead of exclusively to people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender. Transgender people is a collective term that describes individuals whose sexual identity and/or sexual expression partly or always differs from the norm of the sex that they have been assigned at birth. The term includes transsexuals, intersex persons, transvestites and other gender variant people. Only transsexuals people undergo hormone therapy and surgery (sex-reassignment) in order to change his/her physical sex. LGBT initialism is controversial: some argue that transgender and transsexual causes are not the same as that of lesbian, gay, and bisexual people (LGB) whose issues can be seen as a matter of sexual orientation or attraction while transgender and trans-sexuality have to do with gender identity, or self-understanding of being or not being a man or a woman heedless of sexual orientation.

  2. 2.

    Historical records propose that Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, Frederick the Great, and Napoleon were all either homosexual or bisexual (Humphrey 1990); in his relationship with Nicomedes of Bithynia Caesar was believed to have had the passive role.

  3. 3.

    For example, Burg’s (2002) attempts to examine the nature of homosexuality in western military history has been criticized by many.

  4. 4.

    Some Greek philosophers wrote on the issue of homosexuality in the military. In Plato’s Symposium, Phaedrus commented on the power of male sexual relationships to improve bravery in the military.

  5. 5.

    Plutarch—in his Parallel lives. The Life of Pelopidas—is the source of the most substantial surviving account of the Sacred Band of Thebes.

  6. 6.

    The Templar’s Order—officially endorsed by the Roman Catholic Church around 1129—was among the most wealthy and powerful of the Western Christian military orders. The organization existed for nearly two centuries during the Middle Ages and was a greatest skilled fighting units of the Crusades. Non-combatant members of the Order built fortifications across Europe and the Holy Land and managed a large economic infrastructure throughout Christendom, innovating financial techniques that were an early form of banking. In France, in 1307, many of the Order’s members were imprisoned, tortured into giving false confessions, and then burned at the stake. The Pope Clement V, under pressure from Philip V, disbanded the Order in 1312 (Barber 1978, 1994).

  7. 7.

    The French Foreign Legion, established in 1831, was exclusively created for foreign nationals willing to serve in the French Armed Forces. As its personnel come from different countries with different cultures, the Foreign Legion needs not only military skills but also a strong esprit de corps as a way to strengthen them enough to work as a team. So Legio Patria Nostra (The Legion is our Fatherland) is the motto of the Foreign Legion.

  8. 8.

    UK armed forces banned gay personnel from serving until a European Court of Human Rights ruling in 2000.

  9. 9.

    Although women constituted only about 2% of military personnel, in making his book Bérubé interviewed 71 people who served in World War Two, of which 8 were women.

  10. 10.

    For further discussion on the distinctive features of military culture, see chapter Military Culture by J. Soeters, in section IV of this volume.

  11. 11.

    The traditional warrior models exclude not only women, but also ethnic minorities from their symbolic representation (for example, Dandeker and Mason 2001).

  12. 12.

    Masculinity is a gender process—usually associated with the male sex—that shapes gender relations and personal identities. Men are most often held to—and judged by—their culture’s current standards of masculinity. Gendered expectations are fixed into social relationships and institutions, and influence the way individuals understand each other and live in society. Social scientists examine the role of masculinity in regulating gendered norms and interactions. Masculinity has been problematized by many scholars in the field of “men’s studies”, challenging the idea that it has a “core” or an “essence” because it is influenced by the ethnicity, “race”, disability, religion, age and class; as such, gender may not always be the primary base of identity (Brod 1987; Brod and Kaufman 1994; Petersen 2003).

  13. 13.

    The concept of “machismo” typically, but not only, dominates the Latino culture.

  14. 14.

    The importance of military uniforms in the gay imagery is witnessed by the fact that gay military associations have more than once asked for permission to walk in gay-pride parades wearing uniforms.

  15. 15.

    A detailed explanation of LGBT Military Index is provided in “Index Methodology” (Polchar et al. 2014, p. 89). To access the complete LGBT Military Index visit www.lgbtmilitaryindex.com.

  16. 16.

    The primary data source for the estimates of transgender military service is the National Transgender Discrimination Survey (NTDS), which was conducted by the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force and the National Center for Transgender Equality (Grant et al. 2011).

  17. 17.

    According to American Psychiatric Association (2013) the gender dysphoria is the experience of an enduring and profound conviction that the sex assigned at birth does not match the self-identified gender. Elders et al. (2015 p. 203) report that «in the newest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5), a comprehensive classification of psychological conditions and mental disorders that reflects the most up-to-date medical understandings, gender identity disorder has been replaced with gender dysphoria, a diagnostic term that refers to an incongruence between a person’s gender identity and the physical gender that they were assigned at birth, and to clinically significant distress that may follow from that incongruence. While gender identity disorder was pathologized as an all-encompassing mental illness, gender dysphoria is understood as a condition that is amenable to treatment».

  18. 18.

    In their study, Elders et al. (2015) analyzing US Defense Department regulations and considering a wide range of medical data, conclude that there is no compelling medical reason for the ban on service by transgender personnel, that the ban is an unnecessary barrier to health care access for transgender personnel, and that medical care for transgender individuals should be managed using the same standards that apply to all others.

  19. 19.

    On the link between social cohesion and motivation in combat see MacCoun et al. (2005).

  20. 20.

    Kristin Beck (born Christopher Beck), former United States Navy SEAL, gained public attention in 2013 when she came out as a trans woman. She published her memoir in June 2013, Warrior Princess: A U.S. Navy SEAL’s Journey to Coming out Transgender detailing her experiences. Beck served for twenty years in the U.S. Navy SEALs before her transition and took part in seven combat deployments. Beck was a member of a special counter-terrorism unit and received multiple military awards and decorations, including a Bronze Star with Combat Distinguishing Device and a Purple Heart. A similarly high decorated soldier (Star with Combat Distinguishing Device and a Purple Heart) was Leonard Matlovich, a Wietnam war veteran. Despite his twelve years of exemplary service, despite his amazing performance ratings, despite his military medal and decoration and his shrapnel wounds, the Air Force demanded his discharge. Matlovich was the first gay service member to purposely out himself to the military to fight their ban on gays and a famous gay men in America in the 1970s. His photograph appeared on the cover of the September 8, 1975, issue of Time magazine, making him a symbol for gay and lesbian service members.

  21. 21.

    In the Unites States the psychiatry’s determination of homosexuality as a mental illness shifted the military’s focus from the sexual act to the individual, thus during many years the screening procedures deemed homosexuality as a personality type that was unfit for military service (Bérubé 1990).

  22. 22.

    After many years of the British Army admitting transsexuals, in January 2015, official news arrived that captain Hannah Winterbourne underwent a sex-change (male-to-female) operation. Captain Winterbourne continues serving the British Army and has no intention to be discharged. The novelty is that until that date only soldiers or petty officers had openly reported about their experience.

  23. 23.

    Until then transgender personnel remained unable to serve openly and continued to be barred from service by military medical policies (Kerrigan 2012; Harrison-Quintana and Herman 2013). These medical policies set up exclusions for what are deemed to be “psychosexual disorders,” counting trans-sexualism, cross-dressing or a history of gender transition (Witten 2007). Transgender people who desired to join the US armed forces were prohibited from doing so if their transgender status was known.

  24. 24.

    see http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/07/13/transgender-in-military_n_7787060.html.

  25. 25.

    When discussing military regulations, very often the family is overlooked or forgotten about, but it is important to remember that many homosexual and transgender troops are married and/or have children. On military family see chapter Military Families: A Comparative Perspective, by Karin Modesto De Angelis, David G. Smith and Mady W. Segal, in section IV of this volume.

  26. 26.

    In the last years, the situation has been slowly changing; the Department of Defense’s extension of certain military “additional benefits” to same-sex spouses—which are not explicitly prohibited under the Defense of Marriage Act—was announced in addition to “member-designated benefits” which were already available to same-sex spouses. In June 2013, the Pentagon announced plans to begin issuing identification cards to the same-sex partners of service members, which will allow them to access education, survivor, commissary, travel, counselling and transportation benefits, but not health care and housing allowances.

  27. 27.

    Homophobic incidents include all acts motivated by hatred towards individuals or groups because of their real or perceived sexual orientation. The violence can take a multitude of forms including physical, sexual or psychological violence, attacks towards individuals or groups or their belongings. The threat of violence can also be reported, especially when it is repetitive and creates fear in the victim.

  28. 28.

    For an analysis of stress and trauma, see chapter Anxiety and Stress in the New Missions, by Henning Soerensen and Claus Kold, in section VI of this volume.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Gender dysphoria. VA, American Psychiatric Publishing. http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/Gender%20Dysphoria%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf.

  • Arkim, W., & Dobrofsky, L. R. (1978). Military socialization and masculinity. Journal of Social Issues, 34(1), 151–168 (winter).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azizlerli, E. (2012). Proving you’re Gay to the Turkish Army. BBC, March 25, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17474967.

  • Barber, M. (1978). The trial of the templars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, M. (1994). The new knighthood: A history of the order of the temple. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bérubé, A. (1990). Coming out under fire: The history of gay men and women in World War Two. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomberg, C. (1994). The heart of the warrior: Origins and religious background of the samurai system in feudal Japan. Japan Library: Sandgate, Folkestone (UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brod, H. (1987). The making of masculinities. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brod, H., & Kaufman, M. (Eds.). (1994). Theorizing masculinities. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burg, B. R. (Ed.). (2002). Gay warriors: A documentary history from the ancient world to the present. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantarella, E. (1992). Bisexuality in the ancient world. New Haven, (Conn.): Yale University Press (originally published 1988 in Italian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1997). The power of identity: The information age: Economy, society and culture (Vol. 2). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • CM/Rec. (2010). 4, Human rights of members of the armed forces. Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Council of Europe, Strasbourg. www.coe.int/justice.

  • Coser, L. A. (1974). Greedy institutions: Patterns of undivided commitment. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dandeker, C., & Mason, D. (2001). The British armed service and the participation of minority ethnic communities: From equal opportunity to diversity? The Sociological Review, 49(2), 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Angelis, K., & Segal, D. R. (2012). Minorities in the military. In J. H. Laurence & M. D. Matthews (Eds.), The oxford handbook of military psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elders, M. J., et al. (2015). Medical aspects of transgender military service. Armed Forces & Society, 41(2), 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, G. J., & Herman, J. L. (2014). Transgender military service in the United States. Williams Institute. www.law.ucla.edu/williamsinstitute.

  • Grant, J. M., et al. (2011). Injustice at every turn: A report of the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. Washington, DC: National Gay and Lesbian Task Force and National Center for Transgender Equality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, E. (1998). Only the real, the true, the masculine held its value: Ernst Röhm, masculinity, and male homosexuality. Journal of the History of Sexuality, 8(4), 616–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison-Quintana, J., & Herman, J. L. (2013). Still serving in silence: Transgender service members and veterans in the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. LGBTQ Policy Journal at the Harvard Kennedy School, 3, 2012–2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, M. (2005). Warriors. London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (1993). Sexual orientation and military service: A social science perspective. American Psychologist, 48, 538–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higate, P. R. (2003). Soft clerks’ and ‘hard civvies’: Pluralizing military masculinities. In P. R. Higate (Ed.), Military masculinities: Identity and the state. Westport (Conn): Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, M. (1990). My country, my right to serve: Experiences of Gay men and women in the military, World War II to present. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D., & Rosenmann, A. (2012). Unit social cohesion in the Israeli Military as a case study of don’t ask, don’t tell. Political Psychology, 33(4), 419–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerrigan, M. F. (2012). Transgender discrimination in the military: The new don’t ask don’t tell. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18(3), 500–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimerling, R., et al. (2007). The veterans health administration and military sexual trauma. American Journal of Public Health, 97(12), 2160–2166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koeszegi1, S. T., et al. (2014). The war against the female soldier? The effects of masculine culture on workplace aggression. Armed Forces & Society, 40(2), 226–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCoun, R. J., et al. (2005). Does social cohesion determine motivation in combat? An old question with an old answer. Armed Forces & Society, 32(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorcroft, Wilson J. (2014). Siegfried Sassoon: Soldier, Poet, lover, friend. New York: The Overlook Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moradi, B., & Miller, L. (2009). Attitudes of Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans toward gay and lesbian service members. Armed Forces & Society, 36(3), 397–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachankis, J. E. (2007). The psychological implications of concealing a stigma: A cognitive-affective-behavioral model. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), 328–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, A. (2003). Research on men and masculinities: Some implications of recent theory for future work. Men and Masculinities, 6(1), 54–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (2013). The global divide on homosexuality: Greater acceptance in more secular and affluent countries (Vol. 1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Polchar, J., et al. (2014). LGBT Military personnel. A strategic vision for inclusion. Hague: The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, J. (2001). Minimal Force: The mark of a skilled warrior. In D. E. Vandergriffe (Ed.), Spirit, blood, and treasure: The American cost of battle in the 21st century. Novato (CA): Presidio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porch, D. (2010). The French foreign legion: A complete history. New York: Skyhorse Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, C. (1966). The evolution of civilizations. Tragedy and hope: A history of the world in our time. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, B. (1999). Celtes et Grecs. Paris: Payot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saul, H. (2013). Gulf States could have clinical screenings to ‘Detect’ homosexuals and stop them entering the country. The Independent, October 8. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/gulf-states-could-have-clinical-screenings-to-detect-homosexuals-and-stop-them-entering-the-country-8867046.html.

  • Segal, D. R., & Kestnbaum, M. (2002). Professional closure in the military labor market: A critique of pure cohesion. In D. M. Snider & L. W. Gayle (Eds.), The future of the army profession. New York: McGrew-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shilts, R. (1993). Conduct unbecoming: Lesbians and gays in the military, Vietnam to the Persian Gulf. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirer, W. (1960). The rise and fall of the Third Reich. New York: Simon &Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, L., & Wegner, D. M. (1999). Covering up what can’t be seen: Concealable stigma and mental control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 474–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stallworthy, J. (1974). Wilfred Owen, a biography. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, A. (2014). Military sexual trauma. Women’s Health Sciences Division, National Center for PTSD.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Meulen, J., & Soeters, J. (2007). Introduction. In J. Soeters & J. van der Meulen (Eds.), Cultural diversity in the armed forces. An international comparison. London & New York, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witten, T. M. (2007). Gender identity and the military transgender, transsexual, and intersex identified individuals in the U.S. Armed Forces. Santa Barbara, CA: Palm Center.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessia Zaretti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zaretti, A. (2018). Lesbian Gay Bi-sexual Transgender (LGBT) Personnel: A Military Challenge. In: Caforio, G., Nuciari, M. (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of the Military. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71602-2_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71602-2_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71600-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71602-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics