Abstract
This chapter focuses on the role of school-based friendship networks in prevention programs during adolescence. These programs intersect with a life course perspective because they are designed to create a turning point at which adolescents’ developmental trajectories will shift away from problem behaviors such as substance use and delinquency. Evaluations of such programs provide a unique opportunity to clarify the dynamic interplay between friendship networks and problem behavior. Specifically, program participants are embedded in friendship networks that may expose non-participants to program messages and effects. The PROSPER Peers project was designed to leverage social network methods and measures to clarify how friendship networks shape the impact of a community-level randomized field trial intended to reduce adolescent substance use. In this chapter, we first describe the project’s conceptual framework regarding peers and prevention. We then summarize what we have learned about the interplay between adolescents’ social networks and prevention effects on problem behavior. Specifically, we demonstrate two ways in which individual-level changes induced by prevention programs can shape the broader peer network and potentially create developmental turning points away from problem behavior: by altering the overall influence-potential of youth who exhibit problem behavior; and by diffusing intervention effects through the social medium of the network to influence youth who did not themselves participate in the prevention program.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
There were two cohorts in each school, and some of the intervention communities had multiple middle/junior high schools; we excluded 1 network that did not to collect friendship nominations and 4 networks that had 0 or 1 SFP-participants. The final sample size was 5784 students (M = 11.8 years; 49.6% female) who were in the 42 networks.
- 2.
We did, however, use data from the 875 non-participants who were excluded because of missing friendship information and from the 889 intervention participants to calculate friends’ characteristics.
- 3.
Measured as the average proportion of SFP-attending friends at the current wave and each previous post-intervention wave.
- 4.
All analyses adjusted for gender, race, network size (natural log), wave, whether the nonparticipant received free or reduced lunch, the non-participants’ frequency of church attendance, family discipline, and parent-youth relationships.
References
Battistich, V. A., Schaps, E., Watson, M., Solomon, D., & Lewis, C. (2000). Effects of the child development project on students’ drug use and other problem behaviors. Journal of Primary Prevention, 21(1), 75–99.
Botvin, G. J., & Griffin, K. W. (2004). Life skills training: Empirical findings and future directions. Journal of Primary Prevention, 25(2), 211–232.
Brown, B. B., & Dietz, E. L. (2009). Informal peer groups in middle childhood and adolescence. In Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 361–376). Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ZxqG6O28r1QC&oi=fnd&pg=PA361&dq=Informal+peer+groups+in+middle+childhood+and+adolescence&ots=3vd8HBqaus&sig=7gTHmrzJILYjm8DdX5a2Fn9pQYQ
Burgess, R. L., & Akers, R. L. (1966). A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social Problems, 14(2), 128–147.
Campbell, R., Starkey, F., Holliday, J., Audrey, S., Bloor, M., Parry-Langdon, N., et al. (2008). An informal school-based peer-led intervention for smoking prevention in adolescence (ASSIST): A cluster randomised trial. The Lancet, 371, 1595–1602. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60692-3.
CPPRG. (1999). Initial impact of the fast track prevention trial for conduct problems: I. The high-risk sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 631–647.
Dishion, T. J. (2013). Stochastic agent-based modeling of influence and selection in adolescence: Current status and future directions in understanding the dynamics of peer contagion. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 596–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12068.
Dishion, T. J., Andrews, D. W., & Crosby, L. (1995). Antisocial boys and their friends in early adolescence: Relationship characteristics, quality, and interactional process. Child Development, 66(1), 139–151.
Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00725.x.
Elder, G. H. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06128.x.
Freeman, L. C. (1978). Segregation in social networks. Sociological Methods and Research, 6, 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241780060040.
Gest, S. D., Osgood, D. W., Feinberg, M. E., Bierman, K. L., & Moody, J. (2011). Strengthening prevention program theories and evaluations: Contributions from social network analysis. Prevention Science, 12, 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0229-2.
Haynie, D. L., & Osgood, D. W. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter? Social Forces, 84(2), 1109–1130. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0018.
Heinrichs, N., Bertram, H., Kuschel, A., & Hahlweg, K. (2005). Parent recruitment and retention in a universal prevention program for child behavior and emotional problems: Barriers to research and program participation. Prevention Science, 6, 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-005-0006-1.
Kelly, J. A., Murphy, D. A., Sikkema, K. J., McAuliffe, T. L., Roffman, R. A., Solomon, L. J., et al. (1997). Randomized, controlled, community-level HIV-prevention intervention for sexual-risk behaviour among homosexual men in US cities. The Lancet, 350, 1500–1505. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(97)07439-4.
Latkin, C. A. (1998). Outreach in natural settings: The use of peer leaders for HIV prevention among injecting drug users’ networks. Public Health Reports, 113, 151–159.
Light, J. M., Greenan, C. C., Rusby, J. C., Nies, K. M., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2013). Onset to first alcohol use in early adolescence: A network diffusion model. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12064.
Miller-Johnson, S., & Costanzo, P. (2004). If you can’t beat ’em...Induce them to join you: Peer-based interventions during adolescence. In J. B. Kupersmidt & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Children’s peer relations: From development to intervention (pp. 209–222). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Molgaard, V., & Spoth, R. (2001). The strengthening families program for young adolescents: Overview and outcomes. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 18, 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1300/J007v18n03_03.
Molgaard, V. M., Kumpfer, K. L., & Fleming, E. (1997). The strengthening families program for parents and youth 10–14: A video-based curriculum. Ames: Institute for Social and Behavioral Research.
Moody, J., & White, D. R. (2003). Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. American Sociological Review, 68, 103–127.
Osgood, D. W., & Anderson, A. L. (2004). Unstructured socializing and rates of delinquency. Criminology, 42(3), 519–550.
Osgood, D. W., Wilson, J. K., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61, 635–655. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096397.
Osgood, D. W., Feinberg, M. E., Gest, S. D., Moody, J., Ragan, D. T., Spoth, R., et al. (2013). Effects of PROSPER on the influence potential of prosocial versus antisocial youth in adolescent friendship networks. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53, 174–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.013.
Redmond, C., Spoth, R., Shin, C., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). Modeling long-term parent outcomes of two universal family-focused preventive interventions: One-year follow-up results. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 975–984. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.67.6.975.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
Rulison, K. L., Feinberg, M., Gest, S. D., & Osgood, D. W. (2015a). Diffusion of intervention effects: The impact of a family-based substance use prevention program on friends of participants. Journal of Adolescent Health, 57, 433–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.06.007.
Rulison, K. L., Gest, S. D., & Osgood, D. W. (2015b). Adolescent peer networks and the potential for the diffusion of intervention effects. Prevention Science, 16, 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-014-0465-3.
Rulison, K. L., Patrick, M. E., & Maggs, J. (2015c). Linking peer relationships to substance use across adolescence. In S. Brown & R. A. Zucker (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of substance use. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1997). A life-course theory of cumulative disadvantage and the stability of delinquency. Developmental Theories of Crime and Delinquency, 7, 133–161.
Spoth, R., & Greenberg, M. (2011). Impact challenges in community science-with-practice: Lessons from PROSPER on transformative practitioner-scientist partnerships and prevention infrastructure development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48, 106–119.
Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (2002). Project family prevention trials based in community–university partnerships: Toward scaled-up preventive interventions. Prevention Science, 3(3), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1019946617140.
Spoth, R. L., Redmond, C., & Lepper, H. (1999). Alcohol initiation outcomes of universal family-focused preventive interventions: One- and two-year follow-ups of a controlled study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, (Suppl 13), 103–111.
Spoth, R. L., Redmond, C., & Shin, C. (2001). Randomized trial of brief family interventions for general populations: Adolescent substance use outcomes 4 years following baseline. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 627–642. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.69.4.627.
Spoth, R., Greenberg, M., Bierman, K., & Redmond, C. (2004a). PROSPER community–university partnership model for public education systems: Capacity-building for evidence-based, competence-building prevention. Prevention Science, 5, 31–39.
Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Shin, C., & Azevedo, K. (2004b). Brief family intervention effects on adolescent substance initiation: School-level growth curve analyses 6 years following baseline. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(3), 535–542.
Spoth, R., Clair, S., Greenberg, M., Redmond, C., & Shin, C. (2007a). Toward dissemination of evidence-based family interventions: Maintenance of community-based partnership recruitment results. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.137.
Spoth, R. L., Redmond, C., Shin, C., Greenberg, M., Clair, S., & Feinberg, M. (2007b). Substance-use outcomes at 18 months past baseline: The PROSPER community-university partnership trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32, 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.014.
Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Clair, S., Shin, C., Greenberg, M., & Feinberg, M. (2011). Preventing substance misuse through community–university partnerships: Randomized controlled trial outcomes 4½ years past baseline. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40, 440–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.012.
Spoth, R. L., Trudeau, L. S., Guyll, M., & Shin, C. (2012). Benefits of universal intervention effects on a youth protective shield 10 years after baseline. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50, 414–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.06.010.
Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Shin, C., Greenberg, M., Feinberg, M., & Schainker, L. (2013). PROSPER community–university partnership delivery system effects on substance misuse through 6 1/2 years past baseline from a cluster randomized controlled intervention trial. Preventive Medicine, 56, 190–196.
Stevens, R. J., & Slavin, R. E. (1995). The cooperative elementary school: Effects on students’ achievement, attitudes, and social relations. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 321.
Tobler, N. S., Roona, M. R., Ochshorn, P., Marshall, D. G., Streke, A. V., & Stackpole, K. M. (2000). School-based adolescent drug prevention programs: 1998 meta-analysis. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 20(4), 275–336.
Valente, T. W. (1995). Network models of the diffusion of innovations. Cresskill: Hampton Press.
Valente, T. W. (2010). Social networks and health: Models, methods, and applications. New York: Oxford University Press.
Valente, T. W., Hoffman, B. R., Ritt-Olsan, A., Lichtman, K., & Johnson, C. A. (2003). Effects of a social-network method for group assignment strategies on peer-led tobacco prevention programs in schools. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1837–1843. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.11.1837.
Valente, T. W., Gallaher, P., & Mouttapa, M. (2004). Using social networks to understand and prevent substance use: A transdisciplinary perspective. Substance Use & Misuse, 39, 10–12. https://doi.org/10.1081/ja-200033210.
Veenstra, R., Dijkstra, J. K., Steglich, C., & Van Zalk, M. (2013). Network-behavior dynamics. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12070.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wyman, P. A., Brown, C. H., LoMurray, M., Schmeelk-Cone, K., Petrova, M., Yu, Q., et al. (2010). An outcome evaluation of the sources of strength suicide prevention program delivered by adolescent peer leaders in high schools. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 1653–1661. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.190025.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rulison, K.L., Gest, S.D., Feinberg, M., Osgood, D.W. (2018). Impact of School-Based Prevention Programs on Friendship Networks and the Diffusion of Substance Use and Delinquency. In: Alwin, D., Felmlee, D., Kreager, D. (eds) Social Networks and the Life Course. Frontiers in Sociology and Social Research, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71544-5_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71544-5_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71543-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71544-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)