Skip to main content

Impact of School-Based Prevention Programs on Friendship Networks and the Diffusion of Substance Use and Delinquency

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Networks and the Life Course

Part of the book series: Frontiers in Sociology and Social Research ((FSSR,volume 2))

  • 1646 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the role of school-based friendship networks in prevention programs during adolescence. These programs intersect with a life course perspective because they are designed to create a turning point at which adolescents’ developmental trajectories will shift away from problem behaviors such as substance use and delinquency. Evaluations of such programs provide a unique opportunity to clarify the dynamic interplay between friendship networks and problem behavior. Specifically, program participants are embedded in friendship networks that may expose non-participants to program messages and effects. The PROSPER Peers project was designed to leverage social network methods and measures to clarify how friendship networks shape the impact of a community-level randomized field trial intended to reduce adolescent substance use. In this chapter, we first describe the project’s conceptual framework regarding peers and prevention. We then summarize what we have learned about the interplay between adolescents’ social networks and prevention effects on problem behavior. Specifically, we demonstrate two ways in which individual-level changes induced by prevention programs can shape the broader peer network and potentially create developmental turning points away from problem behavior: by altering the overall influence-potential of youth who exhibit problem behavior; and by diffusing intervention effects through the social medium of the network to influence youth who did not themselves participate in the prevention program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There were two cohorts in each school, and some of the intervention communities had multiple middle/junior high schools; we excluded 1 network that did not to collect friendship nominations and 4 networks that had 0 or 1 SFP-participants. The final sample size was 5784 students (M = 11.8 years; 49.6% female) who were in the 42 networks.

  2. 2.

    We did, however, use data from the 875 non-participants who were excluded because of missing friendship information and from the 889 intervention participants to calculate friends’ characteristics.

  3. 3.

    Measured as the average proportion of SFP-attending friends at the current wave and each previous post-intervention wave.

  4. 4.

    All analyses adjusted for gender, race, network size (natural log), wave, whether the nonparticipant received free or reduced lunch, the non-participants’ frequency of church attendance, family discipline, and parent-youth relationships.

References

  • Battistich, V. A., Schaps, E., Watson, M., Solomon, D., & Lewis, C. (2000). Effects of the child development project on students’ drug use and other problem behaviors. Journal of Primary Prevention, 21(1), 75–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botvin, G. J., & Griffin, K. W. (2004). Life skills training: Empirical findings and future directions. Journal of Primary Prevention, 25(2), 211–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B., & Dietz, E. L. (2009). Informal peer groups in middle childhood and adolescence. In Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 361–376). Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ZxqG6O28r1QC&oi=fnd&pg=PA361&dq=Informal+peer+groups+in+middle+childhood+and+adolescence&ots=3vd8HBqaus&sig=7gTHmrzJILYjm8DdX5a2Fn9pQYQ

  • Burgess, R. L., & Akers, R. L. (1966). A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social Problems, 14(2), 128–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R., Starkey, F., Holliday, J., Audrey, S., Bloor, M., Parry-Langdon, N., et al. (2008). An informal school-based peer-led intervention for smoking prevention in adolescence (ASSIST): A cluster randomised trial. The Lancet, 371, 1595–1602. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60692-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CPPRG. (1999). Initial impact of the fast track prevention trial for conduct problems: I. The high-risk sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 631–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J. (2013). Stochastic agent-based modeling of influence and selection in adolescence: Current status and future directions in understanding the dynamics of peer contagion. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 596–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., Andrews, D. W., & Crosby, L. (1995). Antisocial boys and their friends in early adolescence: Relationship characteristics, quality, and interactional process. Child Development, 66(1), 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00725.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elder, G. H. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06128.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1978). Segregation in social networks. Sociological Methods and Research, 6, 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241780060040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gest, S. D., Osgood, D. W., Feinberg, M. E., Bierman, K. L., & Moody, J. (2011). Strengthening prevention program theories and evaluations: Contributions from social network analysis. Prevention Science, 12, 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0229-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynie, D. L., & Osgood, D. W. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter? Social Forces, 84(2), 1109–1130. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrichs, N., Bertram, H., Kuschel, A., & Hahlweg, K. (2005). Parent recruitment and retention in a universal prevention program for child behavior and emotional problems: Barriers to research and program participation. Prevention Science, 6, 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-005-0006-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. A., Murphy, D. A., Sikkema, K. J., McAuliffe, T. L., Roffman, R. A., Solomon, L. J., et al. (1997). Randomized, controlled, community-level HIV-prevention intervention for sexual-risk behaviour among homosexual men in US cities. The Lancet, 350, 1500–1505. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(97)07439-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latkin, C. A. (1998). Outreach in natural settings: The use of peer leaders for HIV prevention among injecting drug users’ networks. Public Health Reports, 113, 151–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, J. M., Greenan, C. C., Rusby, J. C., Nies, K. M., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2013). Onset to first alcohol use in early adolescence: A network diffusion model. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller-Johnson, S., & Costanzo, P. (2004). If you can’t beat ’em...Induce them to join you: Peer-based interventions during adolescence. In J. B. Kupersmidt & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Children’s peer relations: From development to intervention (pp. 209–222). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Molgaard, V., & Spoth, R. (2001). The strengthening families program for young adolescents: Overview and outcomes. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 18, 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1300/J007v18n03_03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molgaard, V. M., Kumpfer, K. L., & Fleming, E. (1997). The strengthening families program for parents and youth 10–14: A video-based curriculum. Ames: Institute for Social and Behavioral Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, J., & White, D. R. (2003). Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. American Sociological Review, 68, 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, D. W., & Anderson, A. L. (2004). Unstructured socializing and rates of delinquency. Criminology, 42(3), 519–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, D. W., Wilson, J. K., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61, 635–655. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, D. W., Feinberg, M. E., Gest, S. D., Moody, J., Ragan, D. T., Spoth, R., et al. (2013). Effects of PROSPER on the influence potential of prosocial versus antisocial youth in adolescent friendship networks. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53, 174–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redmond, C., Spoth, R., Shin, C., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). Modeling long-term parent outcomes of two universal family-focused preventive interventions: One-year follow-up results. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 975–984. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.67.6.975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rulison, K. L., Feinberg, M., Gest, S. D., & Osgood, D. W. (2015a). Diffusion of intervention effects: The impact of a family-based substance use prevention program on friends of participants. Journal of Adolescent Health, 57, 433–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.06.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rulison, K. L., Gest, S. D., & Osgood, D. W. (2015b). Adolescent peer networks and the potential for the diffusion of intervention effects. Prevention Science, 16, 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-014-0465-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rulison, K. L., Patrick, M. E., & Maggs, J. (2015c). Linking peer relationships to substance use across adolescence. In S. Brown & R. A. Zucker (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of substance use. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1997). A life-course theory of cumulative disadvantage and the stability of delinquency. Developmental Theories of Crime and Delinquency, 7, 133–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., & Greenberg, M. (2011). Impact challenges in community science-with-practice: Lessons from PROSPER on transformative practitioner-scientist partnerships and prevention infrastructure development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48, 106–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (2002). Project family prevention trials based in community–university partnerships: Toward scaled-up preventive interventions. Prevention Science, 3(3), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1019946617140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R. L., Redmond, C., & Lepper, H. (1999). Alcohol initiation outcomes of universal family-focused preventive interventions: One- and two-year follow-ups of a controlled study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, (Suppl 13), 103–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R. L., Redmond, C., & Shin, C. (2001). Randomized trial of brief family interventions for general populations: Adolescent substance use outcomes 4 years following baseline. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 627–642. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.69.4.627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Greenberg, M., Bierman, K., & Redmond, C. (2004a). PROSPER community–university partnership model for public education systems: Capacity-building for evidence-based, competence-building prevention. Prevention Science, 5, 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Shin, C., & Azevedo, K. (2004b). Brief family intervention effects on adolescent substance initiation: School-level growth curve analyses 6 years following baseline. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(3), 535–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Clair, S., Greenberg, M., Redmond, C., & Shin, C. (2007a). Toward dissemination of evidence-based family interventions: Maintenance of community-based partnership recruitment results. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R. L., Redmond, C., Shin, C., Greenberg, M., Clair, S., & Feinberg, M. (2007b). Substance-use outcomes at 18 months past baseline: The PROSPER community-university partnership trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32, 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Clair, S., Shin, C., Greenberg, M., & Feinberg, M. (2011). Preventing substance misuse through community–university partnerships: Randomized controlled trial outcomes 4½ years past baseline. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40, 440–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R. L., Trudeau, L. S., Guyll, M., & Shin, C. (2012). Benefits of universal intervention effects on a youth protective shield 10 years after baseline. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50, 414–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.06.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Shin, C., Greenberg, M., Feinberg, M., & Schainker, L. (2013). PROSPER community–university partnership delivery system effects on substance misuse through 6 1/2 years past baseline from a cluster randomized controlled intervention trial. Preventive Medicine, 56, 190–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, R. J., & Slavin, R. E. (1995). The cooperative elementary school: Effects on students’ achievement, attitudes, and social relations. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, N. S., Roona, M. R., Ochshorn, P., Marshall, D. G., Streke, A. V., & Stackpole, K. M. (2000). School-based adolescent drug prevention programs: 1998 meta-analysis. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 20(4), 275–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente, T. W. (1995). Network models of the diffusion of innovations. Cresskill: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valente, T. W. (2010). Social networks and health: Models, methods, and applications. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Valente, T. W., Hoffman, B. R., Ritt-Olsan, A., Lichtman, K., & Johnson, C. A. (2003). Effects of a social-network method for group assignment strategies on peer-led tobacco prevention programs in schools. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1837–1843. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.11.1837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente, T. W., Gallaher, P., & Mouttapa, M. (2004). Using social networks to understand and prevent substance use: A transdisciplinary perspective. Substance Use & Misuse, 39, 10–12. https://doi.org/10.1081/ja-200033210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra, R., Dijkstra, J. K., Steglich, C., & Van Zalk, M. (2013). Network-behavior dynamics. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wyman, P. A., Brown, C. H., LoMurray, M., Schmeelk-Cone, K., Petrova, M., Yu, Q., et al. (2010). An outcome evaluation of the sources of strength suicide prevention program delivered by adolescent peer leaders in high schools. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 1653–1661. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.190025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly L. Rulison .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rulison, K.L., Gest, S.D., Feinberg, M., Osgood, D.W. (2018). Impact of School-Based Prevention Programs on Friendship Networks and the Diffusion of Substance Use and Delinquency. In: Alwin, D., Felmlee, D., Kreager, D. (eds) Social Networks and the Life Course. Frontiers in Sociology and Social Research, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71544-5_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71544-5_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71543-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71544-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics