Skip to main content
  • 836 Accesses

Abstract

Circumstantial and anecdotal evidence of speculative bubbles and subsequent crashes can be traced as far back as ancient Rome and Greece and Babylon (Mesopotamia). The presence of mere speculation alone, which was clearly an aspect of trade in the ancient world, is not however sufficient to make an asset price “bubble.” Throughout history, bubbles and crashes have been common and complex events that always involve money, credit, trust, psychology, and emotions. This chapter introduces readers to these elements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Speculation, Brunnermeier (2001, p. 48) writes, is when “A trader is only willing to buy or hold an asset at a price which is higher than its fundamental value if he thinks that he can resell the asset at an even higher price in a later trading round…A trader speculates if his foremost interest is in cashing in capital gains rather than enjoying a future dividend stream. Consequently, one might think the fundamental value might be the price which an investor is willing to pay if he is forced to hold the asset forever, that is, if he is not allowed to re-trade.” This follows Harrison and Kreps (1978) who in turn follow Keynes (1936 [1964], Ch. 12, VI). And Lefèvre (1923, p. 280) writes, “Speculation in stocks will never disappear. It isn’t desirable that it should. It cannot be checked by warnings as to its dangers…The game does not change and neither does human nature” (p. 180). Keynes also said, “It is safer to be a speculator than an investor…a speculator is one who runs risks of which he is aware and an investor is one who runs risks of which he is unaware.”

  2. 2.

    In the Babylonian period, some 4000 years ago, Oates (1986, pp. 10–15) explains that “Babylonia, though potentially rich in agricultural products lacked such essential commodities as stone, timber and metal ores…For this reason, trade was of crucial importance…Writing was invented in Mesopotamia as a method of book-keeping.” Dunbar (2000, p. 25) notes that in Hammurabi’s time, some 3800 years ago, there were crop loans and option-like arrangements and that “recent archaeological research has shown that there was a thriving loan market in ancient Babylon where borrowers could search for the best rate, just as homebuyers do today.” See also Samuels et al. (2007), which contains articles about economic circumstances in earlier centuries, and Neal (2015, p. 16) who writes that the first recorded financial crisis occurred in 1788 BC after the king of ancient Uruk in Mesopotamia declared all debts null and void. Goetzmann (2016b, pp. 58–72) also covers this and presents a chart of barley prices.

  3. 3.

    Lei et al. (2001) found in a laboratory experiment that in a “setting in which speculation is not possible, bubbles and crashes are observed.” This is nonsensical. McFarland (2016) found that “results obtained in the real world are not the same as those obtained in the laboratory.”

  4. 4.

    Even with only a rudimentary coinage system as a basic medium of exchange, it might be inferred, for example, that speculation was a part of every Athenian fishmonger’s daily function. As Davidson (1999, p. 8) discusses, “…the undisputed master of the fishmonger’s stall was the eel.” Eel were regarded as irresistible delicacies (pp. 186–7) and were much sought after and “the price of fresh fish was generally high at Athens.” Indeed, as De Soto (2006, p. 51), citing Rostovtzeff (1953, p. 405), writes of the period around 300 BCE, “[T]he Hellenistic period, especially Ptolemaic Egypt, was a turning point in the history of banking because it marked the creation of the first government bank.” Rostovtzeff linked this development to “[R]efined accounting, based on a well-defined professional terminology.” Also, around 600 BCE, Greek philosopher Thales was said to have cornered the market for olive presses and profited greatly. See Aristotle (1944) Politics, section 1259a at www.perseus.tufts.edu

  5. 5.

    The Annals, Book VI, pp. 16–17, authored by Tacitus in 109 ACE, describes events circa 33 AD that began when Emperor Tiberius enforced a ceiling on interest rates: “Hence followed a scarcity of money, a great shock being given to all credit…Creditors however, were suing for payment in full…usurers had hoarded up all their money for buying land. The facilities for selling were followed by a fall of prices, and the deeper a man was in debt, the more reluctantly did he part with his property, and many were utterly ruined. The destruction of private wealth precipitated the fall of rank and reputation…” As noted by Calomiris and Meltzer (2016), “Tiberius responded …by making large, interest-free, three-year loans to Roman banks.”

  6. 6.

    In response to my email inquiries to Professor Richard Saller of the University of Chicago and Professor Walter Scheidel of Stanford University, both experts on the economic aspects of these eras, neither could readily point to any specific bubble incidents in ancient Greece and Rome. Their writings, however, suggest the presence of significant price variability and cycles of economic activity.

  7. 7.

    Donkin (2003, p. 92) writes that Indian spice exports were mentioned in written works as early as the year 850. See also Keay (2006, p. 46). In an email exchange (June 24, 2008), Keay writes that price speculation can be “taken for granted throughout the history of the spice trade…in the early days of the London and Dutch East India Companies the price of pepper plummeted dramatically every time a fleet returned. Speculators needed to hang on to stocks as long as they could, creating a bubble, but to sell smartly before the bubble burst with reports of returning ships. Intelligence was everything.”

  8. 8.

    Benholz (2003).

  9. 9.

    Ferguson (2009, pp. 50–53).

  10. 10.

    On the tulip mania and the South Sea Bubble, Chancellor (1999, pp. 19 and 89) indicates that “the number of mercantile bankruptcies in 1721 did not increase significantly from the previous year and the economy recovered quickly.” The economic effects of crashes were also classified by Mishkin and White (2003), who after studying 15 crash episodes of the twentieth century were able to fit them into four categories ranging from no discernable stress on the financial system (e.g., 1940 and 1946), to stress mitigated by Federal Reserve actions (e.g., 1987), to episodes in which minor widening of interest-rate spreads was seen (e.g., 1969–1970, 1990), and to episodes in which large widening of interest-rate spreads was seen (e.g., 1907, 1930–1933). As they note, “one cannot make the case that crashes are always the main cause of financial instability.” And market crashes may or may not be accompanied by financial instability. Posen (2003) contains data on the subsequent economic impact after bubbles have burst.

    Detken and Smets (2004) classify “booms” as being either high-cost or low-cost, saying, “Not all booms lead to large output losses…High-cost booms are clearly those in which real estate prices and investment crash in the post-boom periods.” Asset price booms are defined “as a positive deviation of an aggregate asset price indicator from its recursively estimated trend by at least 10 percent.”

  11. 11.

    The aim is to provide a statistical foundation on which all asset price bubbles (and crashes) can be defined, described, identified, and compared.

  12. 12.

    Hendricks (2015) studies bubbles of all types.

  13. 13.

    Ferreira and Karali (2017) found that “global financial markets are resilient to shocks caused by earthquakes even if these are domestic.”

  14. 14.

    Kindleberger (1989, p. 24) has suggested that although no two speculative manias are identical, manias develop along similar lines and have changed little from the distant past to the present. Chamely (2004, p. 359) adds that “examination of famous bubbles in the past shows that they always originated in some genuine good news.” 1930s 68 and early 1940s, “Current news and political developments are…soon forgotten; their presumed influence on market trends is not as weighty as is commonly believed.” See also Cutler et al. (1989).

  15. 15.

    Chancellor (1999, pp. 125–126) writes that “journals and pamphlets proclaimed the railways as a revolutionary advance unparalleled in the history of the world. They not only focused on the economic benefits of railway transport, but concerned themselves with its more widespread effects on human civilization…There was no limit to the imagined effects of this revolution…From an investment point of view, it was argued that railway shares would remain ‘safe’ in midst of panic…The public was gripped by a railway vogue.” Nairn (2001) covers technology manias; Oliver (2007) and Kaplan (2011) write that tech stock valuations in 2011 had reached “bubble” dimensions. Pastor and Veronesi (2008) present a general equilibrium model in which stock prices of innovative firms operating in technologically revolutionary sectors exhibit “bubbles.”

  16. 16.

    Schumpeter pertains, for instance, to the Japanese experience of the late 1980s, when readily available credit was apparently not fully absorbed by investments in the real economy and instead spilled over into non-GDP transactions. See Noguchi (1994), Werner (2005), and Wood (2005).

  17. 17.

    Greenwald et al. (2001, p. xii).

  18. 18.

    Arnhart (2003) says that “natural selection has shaped human nature to express at least twenty natural desires that are manifested in diverse ways in all human societies throughout history. Human beings generally desire a complete life, parental care, sexual identity, sexual mating, familial bonding, friendship, social ranking, justice as reciprocity, political rule, war, health, beauty, wealth,…” And from Dewey (1922, p. 107): “…human nature remains from age to age the same.” However, as noted in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_nature, there are many different views and schools of religious, psychological, ethical, economic, political, and philosophic thought on the subject. Of course, human nature of 2000 years ago is documented in the Old and New Testaments. See also Amhart (1998) and Olson (2006) for a review of core personality traits and implications for financial and economic behavior.

  19. 19.

    See Schaede (1989), who writes that “differences to modern futures exchanges can be observed in early mark-to-market procedures and margin requirements.” See also West (2000).

  20. 20.

    See Gray and Vogel (2016, pp. 3–5). “De la Vega vividly described excessive trading, overreaction, underreaction, and the disposition effect well before they were documented by modern finance journals… Homma described the role of emotions and how these could affect rice prices…[T]he psychological aspect of the market was critical to …trading success.” Corzo et al. (2014) show Vega’s knowledge, 300 years ago, of herding, overconfidence, and regret aversion.

  21. 21.

    The principal trading strategists and/or partners at Long-Term Capital included several well-known economists and Nobel Laureate proponents of EMH-based theories. Capie and Wood (2007, p. xiv) also note that LTCM’s solvency was impaired because the derivatives contracts “had clauses that give the counterparties the right to terminate the contract in the event of a default of any kind by a counterparty…counterparties had the right to liquidate any of the defaulting counterparties’ assets…even if the assets are not directly related to the derivatives contracts in question.” Triana (2009, pp. 253–4) notes that LTCM had been selling volatility so sizeably and aggressively as to have been nicknamed the “Central Bank of Volatility.” Each percentage point increase in implied volatility was estimated to have cost LTCM $100 million, and in total, the equity index volatility trades had generated losses of $1.3 billion.

  22. 22.

    Černý (2004, p. 56).

  23. 23.

    In this, transitivity of choice—that is, if A>B and B>C, then A>C—provides the theoretical cornerstone of rationality. A whole school of thought, as described in Werner (2005) and Cassidy (2006), sees the rational expectations hypothesis (REH) as a neoclassical axiom that should not be taken as an established fact and thus not as a given starting point for analysis. Along the same lines, Anand (1993) goes so far as to say that the normative interpretation of subjective expected utility (SEU), which is equivalent to the REH, is empirically false. He cites studies by Rapoport and Wallsten (1972), Schoemaker (1982), Machina (1987), and Baron (1988). Anand explains that: “It is an essential feature of SEU that it specifies a mathematics of decision, but it is open whether we use it for normative or positive purposes (p. 17)…SEU is false… SEU uses independence in a sense that amounts to requiring that utility is linear with respect to probability…However…agents consistently violate the assumption” (p. 73).

  24. 24.

    Constant absolute risk aversion (CARA) is part of a family of risk aversion utility functions that also includes constant relative risk aversion (CRRA) and hyperbolic absolute risk aversion (HARA). Černý (2004, p. 57) indicates that in evaluating distributions of wealth relative to an initial level of wealth V0, a proper expression is U(V)/ U(V0) = f(V-V0) for all V and V0 and the undetermined function, f. The only utility function that meets all the conditional requirements turns out to be exponential.

  25. 25.

    Ariely (2008, p. 240). 

  26. 26.

    This effect was first identified by Brickman and Campbell (1971) and in psychology is called the “hedonic treadmill.” As such, this utility function representation is probably discontinuous and of the jump variety for individuals but is continuous in the aggregate. It is not the mathematical inverse of the conventional description. From Gao and Schmidt (2005): “…economic agents do not always choose what they really want…[A]lthough such ‘irrational’ behavior may decrease economic utility, it gives agents psychological satisfaction and subjective comfort, thus increasing their immaterial utility. In this sense, agents remain rational when conducting such behaviors, even though they run directly contrary to neoclassical rationality concepts.” See also Taleb (2004).

  27. 27.

    As behavioral economist Kahneman said in a post-Nobel Laureate interview in Schrage (2003): “…the market cannot be completely efficient, because people act irrationally when they are afraid.”

  28. 28.

    Tuckett (2011, pp. x–xiii) writes: “traditional economic approaches, including the recent development of behavioural economics, do not capture the essence of what happens in financial markets and why they produce crises…[W]hatever else goes on in an asset boom and bust, it looks primarily like an emotional sequence.” See also Poundstone (2010, p. 102).

  29. 29.

    Social rationality and zeitgeist are noted by Roehner (2002, p. xvi and p. 40). Along the same lines, Werner (2005, p. 26) notes that “institutions, hierarchies and rankings are important.”

  30. 30.

    Cohen (1997, p. xvii) writes that “…many speculative bubbles share a cluster of common features, even when they are separated by centuries and occur on different continents…there is an underlying similarity in the way events unfold that belies the disorderly antics of a frenzied crowd of get-rich-quick speculators.” Mantegna and Stanley (2000, p. 5) have noted that “[F]inancial markets exhibit several of the properties that characterize complex systems. They are open systems in which many subunits interact nonlinearly in the presence of feedback.” See also Jovanovic and Schinckus (2017).

  31. 31.

    Economists have not generally referred to the notion of a GDP bubble and so there is no specific evidence or literature using this terminology. Such a bubble would, however, be described as an “overheating” economy, which has been studied at length within the context of business and economic cycles. A GDP bubble could also be defined in terms of overall price changes (inflation/deflation) of goods and services rather than through changes of share prices. Treynor (1998) suggests relating a bubble to its own statistical dynamic features—that is, autocorrelating its features.

  32. 32.

    Furnham and Argyle (1998, p. 102) write that “[M]oney confers social power…[and] can easily be seen as an index of social adequacy or worthiness (or, indeed, its opposite).”

  33. 33.

    Nofsinger (2005) and Angeletos and La’O (2013).

  34. 34.

    If so, this at the least inherently suggests that, loosely speaking, the outer skin (i.e., container) of a financial bubble, its outer limit, is determined or defined in part by both the amount of money and credit available and by the collective psychological state of investors, of speculators, and of the population as a whole. The opposite extreme of such a state of collective euphoria—a crash or a panic—would then be tantamount to being what might be called an “inverse” or negative bubble . Shiller (2000) uses the term “negative bubble” several times beginning at page 62. And Shiller (2002) discusses bubble characteristics of US real estate prices. On social mood influences on financial behavior, see Olson (2006) and especially Prechter (2016). Negative bubbles are also discussed in Allen and Gale (2007, p. 247).

  35. 35.

    King (2016, pp. 18–22).

  36. 36.

    Fragment is from Ryan-Collins et al. (2011, p. 9).

  37. 37.

    Pixley (2012, pp. 3–23 and 193). Trust in the stock market is analyzed in Guiso et al. (2008).

  38. 38.

    Martin (2015, p. 33).

  39. 39.

    Greenspan (2007, p. 256).

  40. 40.

    Goetzmann (2016b, p. 4) and French (2009), especially regarding malinvestment implications.

  41. 41.

    Ferguson (2009, pp. 4 and 30–31).

  42. 42.

    Wall Street Week with Louis Rukeyser, December 4, 1987, and December 2, 1988.

  43. 43.

    See The Economist, September 5, 1999, and April 18, 1998. Warnings about bubbles also came from famed investors Warren Buffett and John Templeton . On ABC’s Nightline in 1999 Buffett said, “You know that valuations are high, by historic standards. You know that the level of speculation is high, by any historic standards, and you know that it doesn’t go on forever…but you don’t know when it ends.” And Sir John Templeton told Nightly Business Report in December 1999 that “Internet stocks were a bubble” (He was shorting them). Around the same time, economist Henry Kaufman warned, “The bubble is already very, very big…The question is not if the asset bubble will burst, but when.”

  44. 44.

    Fed Chairman Greenspan, however, had wavered a bit on the subject of bubble visibility . In a speech in August 2002 he said, “As events evolved, we recognized that, despite our suspicions, it was very difficult to definitively identify a bubble until after the fact – that is, when its bursting confirmed its existence…Human psychology being what it is, bubbles tend to feed on themselves, and booms in later stages are often supported by implausible projections of potential demand.” See www.federalreserve.gov and Stout (2002). Greenspan also later suggested, in a December 19, 2002, speech to the Economic Club of New York, that even if a bubble could be reliably identified in advance, bursting it might require raising interest rates so high as to crush the economy, and that bubbles might be an unavoidable by-product of long economic expansions with low inflation and hence act as “tinder for asset price speculation.”

    In this speech, Greenspan said,

    If the bursting of an asset bubble creates economic dislocation, then preventing bubbles might seem an attractive goal. But whether incipient bubbles can be detected in real time and whether, once detected, they can be defused without inadvertently precipitating still greater adverse consequences for the economy remain in doubt… nothing short of a sharp increase in short-term rates that engenders a significant economic retrenchment is sufficient to check a nascent bubble. The notion that a well-timed incremental tightening could have been calibrated to prevent the late 1990s bubble is almost surely illusion.

    O’Driscoll (2007) opines that this speech is the source of “what can be best described as the Greenspan Doctrine.” Hayford and Malliaris (2005) argue that “the Fed has paid significant attention to valuation of the stock market…valuation was an important variable in the Fed’s decision-making and its conduct of monetary policy.” More on Greenspan’s strategies of the time appears in Ip (2004) and Mallaby (2016). Rebello (2005) reviews the Fed meeting transcripts of 1999 which show that although “the Fed’s staff forecasters regarded U.S. stock prices as irrationally high, they underestimated the size of the bubble.” At the peak, tech and telecom issues represented more than 41% of the value of the S&P 500. Public perceptions and attitudes in the Internet bubble are discussed in Browning and Dugan (2002).

    See also “The Great Market Bubble Debate,” BusinessWeek, May 29, 2000, in which Andrew Smithers, co-author of Valuing Wall Street (who was bearish), debates bulls, Professor Jeremy J. Siegel and Kevin A. Hassett, co-author of the book Dow 36,000. Hassett says, “Nobody has ever made a convincing case that there’s been a stock market bubble in the U.S.” Smithers says, “The evidence for a bubble is in the economy as well as the stock market. What bubbles do is create unrealistic expectations for future returns from equities and other assets. Therefore, they tend to depress savings…when you get a bubble in the stock market, it produces profound disequilibrium in the economy.” Siegel says “I really am concerned with these companies that have P/E ratios of 90, 100, and above. I still think stocks, as a diversified portfolio, are the best long-run investment.”

  45. 45.

    Chernow (2009) refers to economist Roger Babson, “whose gloomy forecasts were mocked even as the economy stagnated in the sweltering summer of 1929. On Sept. 5, 1929, Babson reiterated his doomsday cry: ‘Sooner or later a crash is coming, and it may be terrific’.” Similarly, Akerlof and Shiller (2009, pp. 66–7) recall a quote from New York Times reporter Alfred Noyes, who in writing of the speculative mania of 1929 said: “It was not in all respects an agreeable task to point out in the Times what seemed to me the very visible signs of danger. Expression of such comment had to meet the denunciatory comment that the writer was trying to discredit or stop American prosperity.”

    Similar early recognition of the great housing bubble that began to deflate in late 2005 appeared in Shiller (2002), in Barron’s (Abelson 2005), in the New York Times (Rich and Leonhardt 2005), and in Witter (2006) who noted that:

    • 32.6% of new mortgages and home-equity loans in 2005 were interest-only, up from 0.6% in 2000.

    • 43% of first-time home buyers in 2005 put no money down.

    • 15.2% of 2005 buyers owed at least 10% more than their home is worth.

    • 10% of all home owners with mortgages had no equity in their homes.

    • $2.7 trillion dollars in loans would adjust to higher rates in 2006 and 2007.

    The impact of the US housing bubble’s collapse on employment is covered in Byun (2010).

  46. 46.

    New York Times and Milwaukee Journal, October 16, 1929. In the month prior, Fisher foreclosed the possibility of any crash, saying on September 5, 1929, “There may be a recession in stock prices, but not anything in the nature of a crash…the possibility of which I fail to see.” Similarly, as told by J.K. Galbraith in The Great Crash, 1929, p. 70, around the same time economics writer Joseph Lawrence confidently stated that “stocks are not at present over-valued.”

  47. 47.

    From Harman (2000, p. 10).

  48. 48.

    The Economist magazine in April 1989 said in regard to the Japanese market that “…The implication is that shares may be underpriced.” See also Voth (2000). The delusional bliss was similar with regard to housing and the role of derivative securities circa 2007. BusinessWeek (February 19, 2007, p. 34) wrote, “…derivatives let financial institutions and traders manage their risks with mind-blowing precision.” Even after two Bear Stearns funds had already collapsed and Countrywide Financial had warned of broader credit problems, BusinessWeek (August 6, 2007, pp. 23–4) in its Outlook section wrote: “…a severe financial crunch is unlikely….The extent of the subprime problem remains small…The squeeze in the credit markets as a result of the subprime mess is far from a severe one…the widening of risk spreads has not been great…the yield spread on corporate bonds rated BBB…had increased to 1.5% from 1.25% at the end of June. That’s little different from the 1.47% average for all of 2006.” However, in fairness to the magazine, the same issue carried an article (“The Subprime Mess: Let the Blame Begin,” p. 32) critical of the role played by ratings agencies such as S&P, which was owned by McGraw-Hill, the publisher.

  49. 49.

    Zweig (2008) writes that according to surveys of hundreds of companies conducted by Duke University economist John Graham , “[D]uring the week of March 13, 2000, the absolute peak of the market bubble, 82% of finance chiefs said their shares were cheap, with only 3.4% saying their stock was overvalued”.

  50. 50.

    Lee (2004, pp. 20–1).

  51. 51.

    McGrattan and Prescott (2000), using a standard macroeconomic growth model, found that “the market is correctly valued” and, barring any institutional changes, predicted a small future equity premium.

  52. 52.

    According to Zacks Investment Research data. The percentage of “buys” was 69.5%.

  53. 53.

    Hale (2007), in a Wall Street Journal op-ed piece entitled “The Best Economy Ever,” said that the entrepreneurial energy unleashed in developing countries “set the stage for extraordinary economic growth.” In a Fortune magazine interview entitled “The Greatest Economic Boom Ever” that was summarized by Kirkland (2007), then-US Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson , albeit in a somewhat hedged and cautious manner, and advising vigilance, said, “This is far and away the strongest global economy I’ve seen in my business lifetime.” Sorkin (2009, p. 49), however, reveals that in a meeting with President Bush, Paulson actually had expressed concerns about the markets and that “the economy was overdue for a crisis,” as early as August 2006.

  54. 54.

    In Thomas (2012), “Spanish financial leaders in influential positions mostly played down concerns that something might go terribly wrong.” And, the 2007 IMF Global Financial Stability Report declared that weakness in US housing prices posed no systemic threat.

  55. 55.

    Sharma (2015a). Hong and Xie (2018) write of government surveillance and warnings against aggressive selling.

  56. 56.

    Barboza (2015a, b).

  57. 57.

    Lyons and Hong (2016). French (2009, p. 116) suggests that money spilled into stocks after China’s government in 1991 cracked down on a bubble in stamp prices as described in McGregor (1991).

  58. 58.

    In a stock market bubble people act with what might readily be called “infectious” greed, and in a crash with, “infectious” despair in which no such physical containment is possible. Shiller (2006) says, “Bubbles are not purely psychological phenomena. They are an epidemic, and an epidemic requires contagion. An epidemic (bubble) can exist only if conditions favor contagion…One reason financial bubbles are mysterious is that their time pattern depends on the contagion rate of the enthusiasm, the spread of optimism and excitement for the market.” The analogy is with biological models as described by Daley and Gani (1999). However, this approach is probably too great a stretch for a financial market theory in which investors and speculators have all types of objectives and time horizons and are of different sizes and levels of sophistication and knowledge. See also Shiller (2000, [2005] p. 257), Bailey (1957), and Kenourgios et al. (2011) on market contagion. On contagiousness see also Gladwell (2002, pp. 9–11), Berger (2016), and Porras (2016).

  59. 59.

    For example, the Perfect Gas Law defines an ideal gas which behaves at all pressures in the same way that real gases behave at low pressures. Isenberg (1992) describes the physics of soap bubbles.

    Ultimately the only such possible price/valuation container for share prices is—using the real risk-free rate of interest—the point at which the equity risk premium is zero (see Fig. 8.1) and at which the presumed law of one price (LOOP), if it is actually operative, ensures through arbitrage that share prices cannot possibly go any higher for more than a relatively brief time. Noguchi (1994) and Werner (2005) have already shown that credit availability (in the case of the Japanese land and equity inflations of the 1980s) is thus far the closest that an economist can come to capturing, isolating, and measuring the “gas” that collectively fills a bubble’s balloon.

  60. 60.

    The large and long-lasting aspects are emphasized by Blinder (2013, p. 29), from where this description appears. Goetzmann (2016a) defines “a bubble as a large price decline after a large price increase (i.e., a crash after a boom).” He finds that the frequency of bubbles is quite small (i.e., bubbles are rare), with the unconditional frequency being 0.3–1.4%. The definition of a market boom is a doubling in a one-to-three-year period. See earlier version at www.nber.org/papers/w21693

  61. 61.

    Shiller (2000 [2005], p. 5) defines a speculative bubble as “an unsustainable increase in prices brought on by investors’ buying behavior rather than by genuine, fundamental information about value,” with Kindleberger (1987), who sees a bubble as “attracting new buyers – generally speculators – interested in profits from trading in the asset rather than its use or earning capacity,” and with Stiglitz (1990), who says: “if the reason that the price is high today is only because investors believe that the selling price will be high tomorrow – when fundamental factors do not seem to justify such a price – then a bubble exists.” According to Kindleberger, a typical bubble evolves in five stages: displacement, boom, euphoria, peak, and bust. From Kindleberger (1996 [1989], p. 13) and Kindleberger and Aliber (2011, p. 30), “The word mania emphasizes the irrationality; bubble foreshadows the bursting.” Schwartz (1986, p. 255), however, notes that “the word ‘bubble’ has supplanted the pejorative ‘mania’.”

    Another practical definition of a bubble also appears in Fleckenstein and Sheehan (2008, p. 189), where Jeremy Grantham , Chairman of Boston money management firm, GMO, says: “bubbles are definable events when the price action is two standard deviations from a long-term trend.” Based on this criterion, Grantham’s research found that the US stock market (peak in 2000) and real estate bubbles (peak 2005–2006) were the 28th and 29th bubbles, respectively, in financial history beginning with the Dutch tulip craze. Grantham’s definition also appears in Grant (2008, p. 385), in which he says that such an event might be expected once in 40 years or so. See also the GMO Quarterly Letter, Q1 2014, available at www.gmo.com and Grantham (2014).

    In Fleckenstein and Sheehan (p. 94), John Makin , in the American Enterprise Institute’s Outlook of November 9, 2000, is quoted as saying that “A stock market bubble exists when the value of stocks has more impact on the economy than the economy has on the value of stocks.” Martenson (2011, p. 80) writes that “a bubble exists when asset prices rise beyond what incomes can sustain.” Roubini and Mihm (2011, p. 17) explain that “asset bubbles develop even before the credit supply booms, because expectations of future price increases are sufficient to foster a self-fulfilling rise in the asset’s price.”

    From Case and Shiller (2004): “A bubble occurs when exaggerated expectations of future price increases generate unusual demand either by people who fear being priced out of a market or by investors hoping to make a lot of money fast. A bubble is a self-fulfilling prophecy for a while, as successive rounds of buyers push prices higher and higher. But…bubbles carry the seeds of their own destruction. Only time is needed for the bubbles to end.” Shiller (2002) discusses feedback and bubbles and in Shiller (2015, p. xv) calls bubble episodes as “speculative epidemics.” Brunnermeier (2008) provides a formal and detailed modern definition for the New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, in which he refers to bubbles as “asset prices that exceed an asset’s fundamental value because current owners believe that they can resell the asset at an even higher price in the future.” Brunnermeier’s article further observes that:

    [T]here are four main strands of models that identify conditions under which bubbles can exist. The first class of models assumes that all investors have rational expectations and identical information. These models generate the testable implication that bubbles have to follow an explosive path. In the second category of models investors are asymmetrically informed and bubbles can emerge under more general conditions because their existence need not be commonly known. A third strand of models focuses on the interaction between rational and behavioral traders. Bubbles can persist in these models since limits to arbitrage prevent rational investors from eradicating the price impact of behavioral traders. In the final class of models, bubbles can emerge if investors hold heterogenous beliefs, potentially due to psychological biases, and they agree to disagree about the fundamental value.

    Garber (2000, pp. 4–12) notes further that “bubble” is “a fuzzy word filled with import but lacking a solid operational definition…The definition of bubble most often used in economic research is that part of asset price movement that is unexplainable based on what we call fundamentals. Fundamentals are a collection of variables that we believe should drive asset prices…we truly cannot know if the speculation was unsound until after the fact.”

    In the 1992 version of the New Palgrave Dictionary of Money and Finance (edited by Newman et al.), Kindleberger says,

    The theoretical literature uses the assumption of the market having one mind and one purpose, whereas it is observed historically that market participants are often moved by different purposes, operate with different wealth and information and calculate within different time horizons…the theoretical literature has yet to converge on an agreed definition of bubbles, and on whether they are possible.

    Hassett (2002, p. 21), for instance, says “a financial bubble is a period when the price of an asset (stocks, real estate, tulips, etc.) suddenly soars for irrational reasons and then collapses.” But then, “what are irrational reasons?” In a Barron’s interview of September 1, 2011, Jim Grant said: “A bubble is a bull market in which the user of the word, ‘bubble’ has not fully participated.” See also Brown (2008), Dholakia and Turcan (2014), and Barlevy (2015) who writes on the greater fool theory. It’s also been quipped that a bubble is when people are making money that’s greatly disproportionate to their knowledge, skills, and work ethics.

  62. 62.

    The following also pertains:

    …whether with hindsight the run-up in asset prices in the late 1990s was a result of bubble behavior. …this question is quite difficult to answer…The inability to identify asset price bubbles ex ante should be sufficient reason for policymakers to be cautious about taking pre-emptive actions…The inability to identify asset price bubbles ex post…should cause policymakers to take pause… Kroszner (2003, p. 7)

    But McGrattan and Prescott (2003, p. 274) wrote that there was no asset bubble in 1929: “…the reason for the 1929 crash was not that the stock market was overvalued relative to fundamentals…”

    Bierman (1991, pp. 5–7) even suggested some 60 years after the event that the stock market was not obviously too high in 1929 and that it perhaps wasn’t too high at the 1987 peak either. “[T]here will always be a reasonable scenario that will justify the level of prices. Prices go up because many people are betting that the expected value, based on some scenario, justifies the current price.”

  63. 63.

    The quotation continues “…Diba and Grossman (1988) suggest that, in the case of a rational bubble, the first-order difference of stock prices will be nonstationary . Campbell and Shiller (1987) argue that, if dividends and stock prices fail to co-integrate, there is evidence of a bubble; a unit root in the price-dividend ratio implies ‘irrational exuberance’ (Craine 1993).”

  64. 64.

    Articles in Colander (2006) show that there is a growing body of what is called post-Walrasian analysis in which information is the source of differences between the older and newer approaches. For post-Walrasians, as Mathews writes in the Colander volume (p. 80), “rationality, equilibrium, and greed are replaced with purposeful behavior, sustainability, and enlightened self-interest.” See also Lansing (2010).

  65. 65.

    Sornette (2003, p. 285).

  66. 66.

    Keuzenkamp (2000, p. 116) writes : “All models are wrong: Kepler’s, Tinbergen’s, Friedman’s, and ‘even’ those of contemporary econometricians. Some, however, are useful. Kepler’s clearly were, as were Tinbergen’s and Friedman’s. They shared a common respect for simplicity.” Usefulness is the aim of the current project. Einstein’s maxim, as recalled in Medio (1992, p. 3), was that “things must be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” A sign in Einstein’s office at Princeton also said: “Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts.”

  67. 67.

    Total market cap-to-GDP, according to a Fortune magazine interview in 2001, is Warren Buffett’s favorite long-term predictive indicator. As seen in Fig. 1.4, once it sustainably rises above one standard deviation it suggests that a peak is near. However , Lleo and Ziemba (2015) suggested that this MV/GNP ratio is of limited usefulness as a crash forecasting tool. An almost identical line is traced by taking Wilshire 5000 total market cap as a multiple of US domestic final sales for the entire US economy (not shown). Final sales is one of the cleanest (i.e., least adjusted and manipulated) series from which to form ratios.

  68. 68.

    Surowiecki (2004, p. 250).

  69. 69.

    Subsequent articles include Reinhart et al. (2012) and Pattillo et al. (2011).

  70. 70.

    Empirical studies are from Allen and Gale (2000), Stiglitz and Greenwald (2003), and Werner (2005). Werner (2005, pp. 181–245) demonstrates that if monetary policy is correctly measured as it is applied to the credit creation mechanism of a nation’s banking system, it explains speculative capital flows into stocks, real estate, and the nonfinancial sectors of the economy.

  71. 71.

    Roehner (2002, pp. 167–72) uses price multipliers and dispersion criteria.

  72. 72.

    The summary partially follows the phases described in a chart by Hofstra University Professor Jean-Paul Rodrigue available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Stages_of_a_bubble.png

  73. 73.

    Lognormal is used instead of normal because, in the random-walk approach, adding or subtracting a random change might result in a stock price eventually and impossibly wandering below zero. As noted in Poundstone (2005, p. 122), Samuelson found a simple fix to the problem in Bachelier’s original thesis of 1900. The idea was to multiply by a random percentage change instead of adding or subtracting a random amount. This works because a stock within this framework might over a certain time be as likely to double as to halve. The lognormal is thus a geometric random walk.

  74. 74.

    Taylor (2005, p. 51).

  75. 75.

    Booth and Gurun (2004) studied daily returns at the Florentine currency market of 1389–1432, Harrison (1998) investigated London stock trading of 1724–1740, and Mitchell et al. (2002) analyzed the London fixed income market of 1821–1860.

References

  • Abelson, A. (2005, January 31). Unhappy Ending? Barron’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2009). Animal Spirits. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, F., & Gale, D. (2000). Bubbles and Crises. Economic Journal, 110(January).

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, F., & Gale, D. (2007). Understanding Financial Crises. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, F., & Gorton, G. (1993). Churning Bubbles. Review of Economic Studies, 60(4), 813–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, F., Morris, S., & Postlewaite, A. (1993). Finite Bubbles with Short Sale Constraints and Asymmetric Information. Journal of Economic Theory, 61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amihud, Y. (2002). Illiquidity and Stock Returns: Cross-Section and Time-Series Effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amihud, Y., Mendelson, H., & Pedersen, L. H. (2005). Liquidity and Asset Prices. Foundations and Trends in Finance, 1(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, P. (1993). Foundations of Rational Choice Under Risk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angeletos, G.-M., & La’O, J. (2013). Sentiments. Econometrica, 81(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Appley, M. H. (Ed.). (1971). Adaptation-Level Theory. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces that Shape Our Decisions. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnhart, L. (2003). Human Nature is Here to Stay. The New Atlantis, 2(Summer), 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, N. T. (1957). The Mathematical Theory of Epidemics. London: C. Griffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balen, M. (2003). The Secret History of the South Sea Bubble: The World’s First Great Financial Scandal. New York: HarperCollins (Fourth Estate). Also under the title, The King, the Crook, & the Gambler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barboza, D. (2015a, July 13). China’s Incendiary Market Is Fanned by Borrowers and Manipulation. New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barboza, D. (2015b, July 7). Chinese Investors Who Borrowed are Hit Hard by Market Turn. New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlevy, G. (2012). Rethinking Theoretical Models of Bubbles, in Evanoff et al. (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlevy, G. (2015). Bubbles and Fools. Economic Perspectives, Q2. Chicago: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. (1988). Thinking and Deciding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J., & Benhabib, J. (1989). Chaos: Significance, Mechanism, and Economic Applications. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(1), 77–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. (2016). Contagious: Why Things Catch On. New York: Simon & Schuster (Paperback edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B. S., & Gertler, M. (1999, 2000). Monetary Policy and Asset Price Volatility. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, presented at Jackson Hole, Wyoming conference, August. www.kc.frb.org and 2000, NBER Working Paper No. 7559.

  • Bernholz, P. (2003). Monetary Regimes and Inflation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezemer, D. J. (2009). ‘No One Saw This Coming’: Understanding Financial Crisis Through Accounting Models. MRA Paper No. 15892. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/15892/

  • Bierman, H., Jr. (1991). The Great Myths of 1929 and the Lessons to be Learned. Westport: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A. S. (2013). After the Music Stopped: The Financial Crisis, The Response, and the Work Ahead. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, G. G., & Gurun, U. G. (2004). Financial Archaeology: Capitalism, Financial Markets, and Price Volatility. Working paper. East Lansing: Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, M. (2003). Stock Market Crashes, Productivity Boom and Bush, and Recessions: Some Historical Evidence (Unpublished). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook, Ch. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic Relativism and Planning the Good Society. In M. H. Appley (Ed.), Adaptation-Level Theory. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. (2008). Bubbles in Credit and Currency: How Hot Markets Cool Down. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, E. S., & Dugan, I. J. (2002, December 16). Aftermath of a Market Mania. Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnermeier, M. K. (2001). Asset Pricing Under Asymmetric Information: Bubbles, Crashes, Technical Analysis, and Herding. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnermeier, M. K. (2008). Bubbles. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Bluem (Eds.), New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, T. C. (2008). Mean Markets and Lizard Brains: How to Profit from the New Science of Irrationality (Revised ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byun, K. J. (2010). The U.S. Housing Bubble and Bust: Impacts on Employment. Monthly Labor Review, 133, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calomiris, C. W., & Meltzer, A. (2016). Rules for the Lender of Last Resort: Introduction. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 28(October), 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. F. (1989). An Experimental Test of Several Generalized Utility Theories. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2, 61–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. Y., & Shiller, R. J. (1987). Cointegration and Tests of Present Value Models. Journal of Political Economy, 95(5), 1062–1088.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capie, F. H., & Wood, G. E. (2007). The Lender of Last Resort. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, K. E., & Shiller, R. J. (2004, August 24). Mi Casa Es Su Housing Bubble. Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, J. (2006, September 18). Mind Games: What Neuroeconomics Tells Us about Money and the Brain. The New Yorker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchetti, S. G. (2008). Asset Bubbles and the Fed. Milken Institute Review, Second Quarter 10(2), 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Černý, A. (2004). Mathematical Techniques in Finance: Tools for Incomplete Markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, D., & Dimson, E. (Eds.). (2016). Financial Market History: Reflections on the Past for Investors Today. Charlottesville: CFA Institute Research Foundation. http://www.cfapubs.org/doi/pdf/10.2470/rf.v2016.n3.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamley, C. P. (2004). Rational Herds: Economic Models of Social Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chancellor, E. (1999). Devil Take the Hindmost: A History of Financial Speculation. New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernow, R. (2009, October 23). Everyman’s Financial Meltdown. New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. E. (1992). Athenian Economy and Society: A Banking Perspective. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. (1997). The Edge of Chaos: Financial Booms, Bubbles, Crashes and Chaos. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colander, D. (Ed.). (2006). Post Walrasian Macroeconomics: Beyond the Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corzo, T., Prat, M., & Vaquero, E. (2014). Behavioral Finance In Joseph de la Vega’s Confusion de Confusiones. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 15(4), 341–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craine, R. (1993). Rational Bubbles: A Test. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 17, 829–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, D. M., Poterba, J. M., & Summers, L. H. (1989). What Moves Stock Prices? Journal of Portfolio Management, 15(3), 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daley, D. J., & Gani, J. (1999). Epidemic Modelling. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. N. (1999). Courtesans & Fishcakes: The Consuming Passions of Classical Athens. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G. (2002). A History of Money: From Ancient Times to the Present Day (3rd ed.). Cardiff: University of Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bondt, W. (2003). Bubble Psychology. in Hunter et al. (2003 [2005]).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Soto, J. H. (2006). Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles (trans: Stroup, M. A.). Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detken, C., & Smets, F. (2004). Asset Price Booms and Monetary Policy. Working Paper Series No. 364 (May). Frankfurt: European Central Bank. www.ecb.int

  • Dewey, J. (1922). Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology. New York: Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dholakia, N., & Turcan, R. V. (2014). Toward a Metatheory of Economic Bubbles: Socio-Political and Cultural Perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diba, B. T., & Grossman, H. I. (1988). The Theory of Rational Bubbles in Stock Prices. Economic Journal, 98(392), 746–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donkin, R. A. (2003). Between East and West: The Moluccas and the Traffic in Spices Up to the Arrival of Europeans. Darby: Diane Publishing Company and American Philosophical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, N. (2000). Inventing Money: The Story of Long-Term Capital Management and the Legends Behind It. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durant, W. (1944). Caesar and Christ: A History of Roman Civilization and of Christianity from Their Beginnings to A.D. 325. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evanoff, D. D., Kaufman, G. G., & Malliaris, A. G. (Eds.). (2012). New Perspectives on Asset Price Bubbles: Theory, Evidence, and Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, K. (2013). Fractals: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. (1965). The Behavior of Stock-Market Prices. The Journal of Business, 38(1), 34–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, N. (2009, May 17). Diminished Returns. New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, S., & Karali, B. (2017). Do Earthquakes Shake Stock Markets? PLoS One, 10(7), e0133319. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleckenstein, W. A., & Sheehan, F. (2008). Greenspan’s Bubbles: The Age of Ignorance at the Federal Reserve. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. P., & Garber, P. M. (Eds.). (1994). Speculative Bubbles, Speculative Attacks and Policy Switching. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. P., & Hodrick, R. J. (1991). Asset Price Volatility, Bubbles, and Process Switching. In Flood, R. P., & Garber, P. M. 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R., Hodrick, R., & Kaplan, P. (1986). An Evaluation of Recent Evidence on Stock Market Bubbles. NBER Working Paper #1971 in Flood and Garber (1994), Speculative Bubbles, Attacks and Policy Switching. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, D. E. (2009). Early speculative Bubbles and Increases in the Supply of Money (2nd ed.). Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., & Argyle, M. (1998). The Psychology of Money. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabaix, X. (2009). Power Laws in Economics and Finance. Annual Review of Economics, 1, 255–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. (1988). The Great Crash, 1929 (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, L., & Schmidt, U. (2005). Self is Never Neutral: Why Economic Agents Behave Irrationally. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 6(1), 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber, P. M. (2000). Famous First Bubbles: The Fundamentals of Early Manias. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnsey, P., & Saller, R. (1987). The Roman Empire: Economy, Society and Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gascoigne, B. (2003). The Dynasties of China: A History. New York: Carroll and Graf.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, D. A. R. (2007). Consolations for the Economist: The Future of Economic Orthodoxy. Journal of Economic Surveys, 21(3), 417–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gernet, J. (1982). A History of Chinese Civilization (trans: Foster, J. R.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. (2002). The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. New York: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetzmann, W. N. (2016a). Bubble Investing: Learning from History. In D. Chambers, & E. Dimson (Eds.). Financial Market History. Charlottesville, VA: CFA Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetzmann, W. N. (2016b). Money Changes Everything: How Finance Made Civilization Possible. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, J. (2008). Mr. Market Miscalculates: The Bubble Years and Beyond. Mount Jackson: Axios Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grantham, J. (2014, May 5). Jeremy Grantham Remains Bullish on Stocks. Barron’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, W. R., & Vogel, J. R. (2016). Quantitative Momentum. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan, A. (1999, August 27). New Challenges for Monetary Policy. Presented at the FRB Kansas, Jackson Hole Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan, A. (2007). The Age of Turbulance: Adventures in a New World. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, B. C. N., Kahn, J., Sonkin, P. D., & van Biema, M. (2001). Value Investing: From Graham to Buffett and Beyond. New York: Wiley (Paperback edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Trusting the Stock Market. Journal of Finance, 63(6), 2557–2600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haacke, C. (2004). Frenzy: Bubbles, Busts and How to Come Out Ahead. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, D. (2007, July 31). The Best Economy Ever. Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, Y. S. (2000). Bubbles, Fads, and the Psychology of Investors. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Florida State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P. (1998). Similarities in the Distribution of Stock Market Price Changes Between the Eighteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Journal of Business, 71(1), 55–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, M. J., & Kreps, D. (1978). Speculative Investor Behavior in a Stock Market with Heterogeneous Expectations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 89, 519–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartcher, P. (2006). Bubble Man. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassett, K. A. (2002). Bubbleology: The New Science of Stock Market Winners and Losers. New York: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayford, M. D., & Malliaris, A. G. (2005). Is the Federal Reserve Stock Market Bubble-Neutral? In A. G. Malliaris (Ed.). Economic Uncertainty, Instability and Asset Bubbles: Selected Essays. Hackensack: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, E., & Truger, A. (Eds.). (2007). Money, Distribution and Economic Policy: Alternatives to Orthodox Macroeconomics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, V. F. (2015). Bubble Studies: The Brass Tacks. London: Bloomsbury. Leading Frontier Research in the Humanities, (September).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, V. F., & Rendsvig, R. K. (2016). The Philosophy of Distributed Information. In L. Floridi (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Information. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodrick, L. S., & Moulton, P. C. (2009). Liquidity: Considerations of a Portfolio Manager. Financial Management, 38(1), 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. (2011). Rome: A Cultural and Personal History. New York: Random House/Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, W. C., Kaufman, G. G., & Pomerleano, M., eds. (2003). Asset Price Bubbles: The Implications for Monetary, Regulatory, and International Policies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (Paperback, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund [IMF]. (2003). When Bubbles Burst. World Economic Report. Washington, DC: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ip, G. (2004, November 18). Fed Chief’s Style: Devour the Data, Beware of Dogma. Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isenberg, C. (1992). The Science of Soap Films and Soap Bubbles. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janszen, E. (2008, February). The Next Bubble: Priming the Markets for Tomorrow’s Big Crash. Harper’s Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, F., & Schinckus, C. (2017). Econophysics and Financial Economics: An Emerging Dialog. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, Values and Frames. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamarck, A. M. (2001). Economics for the Twenty-First Century. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D. A. (2011, July 25). Don’t Call It The Next Tech Bubble – Yet. Fortune, 164(2), 48–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keay, J. (2006). The Spice Route: A History. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenourgios, D., Samitas, A., & Paltalidis, N. (2011). Financial Crises and Stock Market Contagion in a Multivariate Time-Varying Asymmetric Framework. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 21, 92–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keuzenkamp, H. A. (2000). Probability, Econometrics and Truth: The Methodology of Econometrics. New York/Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. London/San Diego: Macmillan/Harcourt Brace (1964 reprint).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindleberger, C. (1987). Bubbles. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, & P. Newman (Eds.), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindleberger, C. (1996 [1989]). Manias, Panics, and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley (2nd ed., 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindleberger, C., & Aliber, R. Z. (2011). Manias, Panics, and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises (6th ed.). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. (2016). The End of Alchemy: Money, Banking and the Future of the Global Economy. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkland, R. (2007, July 12). The Greatest Economic Boom Ever. Fortune.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolata, G. (Ed.). (2013). The New York Times Book of Mathematics. New York: Sterling.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koo, R. C. (2010). Lessons from Japan: Fighting a Balance Sheet Recession. CFA Institute Conference Proceedings Quarterly, 27(4), 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroszner, R. S. (2003 [2005]). Asset Price Bubbles, Information, and Public Policy. In Hunter et al. (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, R. (2003). All Under Heaven: A Complete History of China. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, J. R. (1991, July 29). Efficient Chaos or, Things They Never Taught in Business School. Barron’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansing, K. J. (2010). Rational and Near-Rational Bubbles Without Drift. Economic Journal, 120(549), 1149–1174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laperriere, A. (2008, April 3). Questions for the Fed. Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattman, P., Smith, R., & Strasburg, J. (2008, March 14). Carlyle Fund in Free Fall as Its Banks Get Nervous. Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bon. (1895). The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. digireads.com. 2009 ed.

  • Lee, T. (2004). Why the Markets Went Crazy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefèvre, E. (1923). Reminiscences of a Stock Operator. New York: George H. Doran. Reprinted 1980 by Fraser Publishing, Burlington VT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei, V., Noussair, C. N., & Plott, C. R. (2001). Nonspeculative Bubbles in Experimental Asset Markets: Lack of Common Knowledge of Rationality vs. Actual Irrationality. Econometrica, 69(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. (2007, August 26). In Nature’s Casino. New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lhabitant, F.-S., & Gregoriou, G. N. (Eds.). (2008). Stock Market Liquidity: Implications for Market Microstructure and Asset Pricing. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lleo, S., & Ziemba, W. T. (2015). Can Warren Buffett Also Predict Equity Market Downturns? https://ssrn.com/abstract=2630068, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2630068

  • Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, A. C. (1999). A Non-Random Walk Down Wall Street. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J., & Hong, S. (2016, November 1). Series of Bubbles Rattles China. Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M. J. (1987). Choice Under Uncertainty. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1, 121–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, C. (1841). Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1995th ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkiel, B. G. (1999). A Random Walk Down Wall Street, 7th ed., 8th ed. (2003), 9th ed. (2007), 11th ed. (2015). New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkiel, B. G. (2003). The Efficient Market Hypothesis and Its Critics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 59–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallaby, S. (2016). The Man Who Knew: the Life and Times of Alan Greenspan. New York: Penguin/Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. (1964). The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices. In P. Cootner (Ed.), The Random Character of Stock Prices. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B., & Hudson, R. L. (2004). The (Mis)Behavior of Markets: A Fractal View of Risk, Ruin, and Reward. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantegna, R. N., & Stanley, H. E. (2000). An Introduction to Econophysics: Correlations and Complexity in Finance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martenson, C. (2011). The Crash Course: The Unsustainable Future of Our Economy, Energy, and Environment. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F. (2015). Money: The Unauthorized Biography – From Coinage to Cryptocurrencies. New York: Random House/Vintage (Paperback edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, J. L. (2004). Dynamics of Markets: Econophysics and Finance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, D. (2016). The Biological Bases of Economic Behaviour: A Concise Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrattan, E. R., & Prescott, E. C. (2000). Is the Stock Market Overvalued? Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 24(4), 20–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrattan, E. R., & Prescott, E. C. (2003). Testing for Stock Market Overvaluation/Undervaluation. In Hunter et al. (2003 [2005]).

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, J. (1991, December 19). China Cancels Its Red-Hot Stamp Market, But Traders Hope Crackdown Will Pass. Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medio, A. (1992). Chaotic Dynamics: Theory and Applications to Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrling, P. (2005). Fischer Black and the Revolutionary Idea of Finance. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. C. (1992). Continuous-Time Finance (Revised ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin, F. S., & White, E. N. (2003). Stock Market Bubbles: When Does Intervention Work? Milken Institute Review (Second Quarter), 5(2), 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, H., Brown, R. L., & Easton, S. A. (2002). Old Volatility – ARCH effects in 19th Century Consol Data. Applied Financial Economics, 12(4), 301–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nairn, A. (2001). Engines that Move Markets: Technology Investing from Railroads to the Internet and Beyond. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, L. D. (2015). A Concise History of International Finance from Babylon to Bernanke. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesvetailova, A. (2010). Financial Alchemy in Crisis: The Great Liquidity Illusion. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nofsinger, J. R. (2005). Social Mood and Financial Economics. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 6(3), 144–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noguchi, Y. (1994). The ‘Bubble’ and Economic Policies in the 1980s. Journal of Japanese Studies, 20(2), 291–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, J. (1986). Babylon (rev ed.). New York: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Driscoll, G. P., Jr. (2007, August 10). Our Subprime Fed. Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Officer, R. R. (1972). The Distribution of Stock Returns. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67(340), 807–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. J. (2007). Financial Crises. In M. J. Oliver & D. H. Aldcroft (Eds.), Economic Disasters of the Twentieth Century. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. J., & Aldcroft, D. H. (Eds.). (2007). Economic Disasters of the Twentieth Century. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, K. R. (2006). A Literature Review of Social Mood. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 7(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks, T. (2005). Medici Money: Banking, Metaphysics, and Art in Fifteenth Century Florence. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, L., & Veronesi, P. (2008). Technological Revolutions and Stock Prices. NBER Working Paper No. 11876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattillo, C., Poirson, H., & Ricci, L. A. (2011). External Debt and Growth. Review of Economics and Institutions, 2(3), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, A. B., & Perkins, M. C. (1999). The Internet Bubble: Inside the Overvalued World of High-Tech Stocks – And What You Need to Know to Avoid the Coming Shakeout. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pixley, J. (2012). Emotions in Finance: Booms, Busts and Uncertainty (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porras, E. R. (2016). Bubbles and Contagion in Financial Markets, Vol 1: An Integrative View. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posen, A. S. (2003). It Takes More than a Bubble to Be Japan. WP 03-9, Institute for International Economics. http://www.petersoninstitute.org/publications/wp/03-9.pdf

  • Poterba, J., & Summers, L. H. (1988). Mean Reversion in Stock Returns: Evidence and Implications. Journal of Financial Economics, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poundstone, W. (2005). Fortune’s Formula: The Untold Story of the Scientific Betting System That Beat the Casinos and Wall Street. New York: Hill and Wang/Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poundstone, W. (2010). Priceless: The Myth of Fair Value. New York: Hill and Wang (Farrar, Straus and Giroux).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prechter, R. R., Jr. (2016). The Socionomic Theory of Finance. Gainesville: Socionomics Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A., & Wallsten, T. S. (1972). Individual Decision Behaviour. Annual Review of Psychology, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebello, J. (2005, March 7). Fed Officials Worried in 1999 About Managing Stock “Bubble’. Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2009). This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, C. M., Reinhart, V. R., & Rogoff, K. S. (2012). Public Debt Overhangs: Advanced-Economy Episodes since 1800. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(3), 69–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, M., & Leonhardt, D. (2005, March 25). Trading Places: Real Estate Instead of Dot-coms. New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehner, B. M. (2002). Patterns of Speculation: A Study in Observational Econophysics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostovtzeff, M. (1941). The Social and Economic History of the Roman Empire. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostovtzeff, M. (1953). The Social and Economic History of the Hellenistic World (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubini, N., & Mihm, S. (2011). Crisis Economics: A Crash Course in the Future of Finance. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russollio, S. (2016, December 6). Greenspan’s New Worrisome Gauge. Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan-Collins, J., Greenham, T., Werner, R., & Jackson, A. (2011). Where Does Money Come From?: A Guide to the UK Monetary and Banking System. London: New Economics Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynecki, D. (2000, April 3). Market Madness: What the Hell is Going On? Fortune, 141(7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, W. J., Biddle, J. F., & Davis, J. B. (Eds.). (2007). A Companion to the History of Economic Thought. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1965). Proof that Properly Anticipated Prices Fluctuate Randomly. Industrial Management Review, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaede, U. (1989). Forwards and Futures in Tokugawa-period Japan: A New Perspective on the Dojima Rice Market. Journal of Banking and Finance, 13, 487–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheinkman, J. A., & LeBaron, B. (1989). Nonlinear Dynamics and Stock Returns. Journal of Business, 62, 311–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1982). The Expected Utility Model. Journal of Economic Literature, 20, 529–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrage, M. (2003). Daniel Kahneman: The Thought Leader Interview. Business+Strategy. Booz, Allen, & Hamilton and. http://ebusiness.mit.edu/schrage/Articles/DanielKahnemanInterview.pdf

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, A. J. (1986). Real and Pseudo-Financial Crises. In F. H. Capie & G. E. Wood (Eds.), The Lender of Last Resort. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D. G. (2006). Roll the Bones: The History of Gambling. New York: Gotham Books (Penguin Group).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R. (2015a, July 7). China’s Stock Plunge Is Scarier Than Greek Debt Crisis. Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. J. (2000, 2005, 2015). Irrational Exuberance (3nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. J. (2002, December 17). Safe as Houses? Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. J. (2006). Irrational Exuberance Revisited. In R. N. Sullivan & J. J. Diermeier (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Investment Management. Charlottesville: CFA Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smick, D. M. (2008). The World Is Curved: Hidden Dangers to the Global Economy. New York: Penguin Portfolio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithers, A., & Wright, S. (2000). Valuing Wall Street: Protecting Wealth in Turbulent Markets. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorkin, A. R. (2009). Too Big To Fail: The Inside Story of How Wall Street and Washington Fought to Save the Financial System – and Themselves. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sornette, D. (2003). Why Stock Markets Crash: Critical Events in Complex Financial Systems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1990). Symposium on Bubbles. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(2), 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E., & Greenwald, B. (2003). Towards a New Paradigm in Monetary Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, D. (2002, August 30). Greenspan Says Fed Could Not Prevent Market Bubble. New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, R. N., & Diermeier, J. J. (Eds.). (2006). Global Perspectives on Investment Management. Charlottesville: CFA Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surowiecki, J. (2004). The Wisdom of Crowds. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swarup, B. (2014). Money Mania: Booms, Panics and Busts from Ancient Rome to the Great Meltdown. New York: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylla, R. (2001). The New Media Boom in Historical Perspective. Prometheus, 19(1), 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, N. N. (2004). Bleed or Blowup? Why Do We Prefer Asymmetric Payoffs? Journal of Behavioral Finance, 5(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, N. N. (2005). Fooled by Randomness. New York: Random House (2nd paperback edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, N. N. (2007). The Black Swan. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. (2005). Asset Price Dynamics, Volatility, and Prediction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H. (Ed.). (1992). The Winner’s Curse: Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economic Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H. (Ed.). (2005). Advances in Behavioral Finance (Vol. II). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L., Jr. (2012, June 27). Spain Officials Hailed Banks as Crisis Built. New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treynor, J. L. (1998). Bulls, Bears, and Market Bubbles. Financial Analysts Journal, 54(2), 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triana, P. (2009). Lecturing Birds on Flying: Can Mathematical Theories Destroy the Financial Markets? Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckett, D. (2011). Minding the Markets: An Emotional Finance View of Financial Instability. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaga, T. (1994). Profiting From Chaos: Using Chaos Theory for Market Timing, Stock Selection, and Option Valuation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varchaver, N. (2008, April 28). What Warren Thinks… Fortune, 157(8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, H. L. (2017). Are There Any Laws and Constants in Economics? A Brief Comparison to the Sciences. Journal of Contemporary Management, 6(1), 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voth, H.-J. (2000). A Tale of Five Bubbles – Asset Price Inflation and Central Bank Policy in Historical Perspective. Discussion Paper 416. Canberra: Australian National University. http://econrsss.anu.edu.au

  • Voth, H.-J. (2003). With a Bang, Not a Whimper: Pricking Germany’s ‘Stock Market Bubble’ in 1927 and the Slide into Depression. Journal of Economic History, 63(1), 65–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburton, P. (2000). Debt and Delusion: Central Bank Follies That Threaten Economic Disaster. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherall, J. O. (2013). The Physics of Wall Street: A Brief History of Predicting the Unpredictable. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, R. A. (2005). New Paradigm in Macroeconomics: Solving the Riddle of Japanese Macroeconomic Performance. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, M. D. (2000). Private Ordering at the World’s First Futures Exchange. Michigan Law Review, 98(8), 2574–2615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witter, L. (2006, August 21). The No-Money-Down Disaster. Barron’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C. (2005). The Bubble Economy: Japan’s Extraordinary Speculative Boom of the ‘80s and the Dramatic Bust of the ‘90s. San Luis Obispo: Solstice/London: Sidgwick & Jackson, 1992, and New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweig, J. (2008, August 30). With Buybacks, Look Before You Leap. Barron’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweig, J. (2015, November 14). Deciphering the Dialect: A Wall Street Glossary. Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vogel, H.L. (2018). Introduction. In: Financial Market Bubbles and Crashes, Second Edition. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71528-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71528-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71527-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71528-5

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics