Advertisement

Transhumanism’s Fabian Backstory: A Companion to Martins’ Later Work

  • Steve Fuller
Chapter
Part of the St Antony's Series book series (STANTS)

Abstract

Fuller’s chapter anchors Martins’ Firms Markets, Technology and Paths to the Posthuman in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World. The book partly satirizes Aldous’s brother, Julian Huxley, a ‘missing link’ between Fabian socialism and today’s transhumanism. Julian, who coined ‘transhumanism’ in the 1950s, extended the Fabians’ original eugenic orientation in the context of the movement’s distinctly economistic approach to welfare. Here ‘human capital’ is the linchpin concept, one first elaborated by the American progressive economist, Irving Fisher (1867–1947), also a eugenicist and a proto-transhumanist. Fuller shows how this idea migrated from Fabianism to ‘neo-liberalism’ via such Fabian defectors as Robbins, Coase and Hayek, who formed the Mont Pelerin Society. Fuller reveals an elective affinity between neo-liberal governance and the platform of Zoltan Istvan, the first presidential candidate of the US Transhumanist Party (2016).

Notes

Acknowledgement

I would like to acknowledge the support of the Russian Science Foundation, project number 14-18-02227, ‘Social Philosophy of Science’, with which I’m associated as a Research Fellow in the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy.

References

  1. Coase, R. 1988. The Firm, the Market and the Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 1994. Essays on Economics and Economists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fisher, I. 1930. The Theory of Interest. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Fisher, I., and E. Fisk. 1915. How to Live. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.Google Scholar
  5. Frederick, S., G. Loewenstein, and T. O’Donoghue. 2002. Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature 60: 351–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fuller, S. 2012. Preparing for Life in Humanity 2.0. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2016. Morphological Freedom and the Question of Responsibility and Representation in Transhumanism. Confero 4 (2): 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 2017. Does this Pro-Science Party Deserve our Votes? Issues in Science and Technology (Spring) (33): 31–32.Google Scholar
  9. Fuller, S., and V. Lipinska. 2014. The Proactionary Imperative. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Martins, H.G. 2007. Paths to the Post-Human. Configurações: Revista de Sociologia 1, 2, Nov., 29–56.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2013. Firms, Markets, Technology: Biographies of a Technomarket World. Unpublished Ms.Google Scholar
  12. ———. n.d. Darwinism and the Social Sciences: Issues Concerning Physicalism and Humanism. Unpublished Ms [2009].Google Scholar
  13. Mirowski, P., and D. Plehwe, eds. 2009. The Road from Mont Pèlerin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Rynsard, L. 2015. Cameron’s Speech: The Gulf Between Words and Deeds. 7 October. https://www.fabians.org.uk/camerons-speech-the-gulf-between-words-and-deeds-is-an-opportunity-for-labour/

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steve Fuller
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WarwickCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations