Arce-Nazario, J.A. 2016. Translating land-use science to a museum exhibit. Journal of Land Use Science 11 (4): 417–428.
Bardhan, P., and I. Ray. 2006. Methodological approaches to the question of the commons. Economic Development and Cultural Change 54 (3): 655–676.
Beder, S. 2011. Environmental economics and ecological economics: The contribution of interdisciplinarity to understanding, influence and effectiveness. Environmental Conservation 38 (2): 140–150.
Blue, B., and G. Brierley. 2016. ‘But what do you measure?’ Prospects for a constructive Critical Physical Geography. Area 48 (2): 190–197.
Borrego, M., and L.K. Newswander. 2010. Definitions of interdisciplinary research: Toward graduate-level interdisciplinary learning outcomes. The Review of Higher Education 34 (1): 61–84.
Braun, B. 2008. Environmental issues: Inventive life. Progress in Human Geography 32 (5): 667–679.
Castree, N. 2002. False antithesis? Marxist, nature and actor networks. Antipode 34 (1): 111–146.
DeLonge, M.S., A. Miles, and L. Carlisle. 2016. Investing in the transition to sustainable agriculture. Environmental Science & Policy 55 (1): 266–273.
Donaldson, A., N. Ward, and S. Bradley. 2010. Mess among disciplines: Interdisciplinarity in environmental research. Environment and Planning A 42 (7): 1521–1536.
Gareau, Brian J. 2005. We have never been human: Agential nature, ANT, and marxist political ecology. Capitalism Nature Socialism 16 (4): 127–140.
Graybill, J.K., S. Dooling, V. Shandas, J. Withey, A. Greve, and G.L. Simon. 2006. A rough guide to interdisciplinarity: Graduate student perspectives. BioScience 56 (9): 757–763.
Hedberg, R.C., A. Hesse, D. Baldwin, J. Bernhardt, D.P. Retchless, and J.E. Shinn. 2017. Preparing geographers for interdisciplinary research: Graduate training at the interface of the natural and social sciences. The Professional Geographer 69 (1): 107–116.
Hiwasaki, L., and S. Arico. 2007. Integrating the social sciences into ecohydrology: Facilitating an interdisciplinary approach to solve issues surrounding water, environment and people. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology 7 (1): 3–9.
Johnston, R.J. 1986. Fixations and the quest for unity in geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 11: 449–453.
Lane, S.N. 2017. Slow science, the geographical expedition, and Critical Physical Geography. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien 61 (1): 84–101.
Lave, R., and B. Lutz. 2014. Hydraulic fracturing: A Critical Physical Geography review. Geography compass 8 (10): 739–754.
Lave, R., M.W. Wilson, E.S. Barron, C. Biermann, M.A. Carey, C.S. Duvall, L. Johnson, et al. 2014. Intervention: Critical Physical Geography. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien 58 (1): 1–10.
Lattuca, L.R. 2001. Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
Lele, S., and A. Kurien. 2011. Interdisciplinary analysis of the environment: Insights from tropical forest research. Environmental Conservation 38 (2): 211–233.
Lélé, S., and R.B. Norgaard. 2005. Practicing interdisciplinarity. BioScience 55 (11): 967–975.
Lowe, P., and J. Phillipson. 2009. Barriers to research collaboration across disciplines: Scientific paradigms and institutional practices. Environment and Planning A 41 (5): 1171–1184.
McClintock, N. 2015. A Critical Physical Geography of urban soil contamination. Geoforum 65: 69–85.
Meyerhoff, E., E. Johnson, and B. Braun. 2011. Time and the university. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 10 (3): 483–507.
Mountz, A., A. Bonds, B. Mansfield, J. Loyd, J. Hyndman, M. Walton-Roberts, R. Basu, et al. 2015. For slow scholarship: A feminist politics of resistance through collective action in the neoliberal university. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 14 (4): 1235–1259.
Morgan, D.L. 2007. Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (1): 48–76.
———. 2013. Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: A pragmatic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Öberg, G. 2009. Facilitating interdisciplinary work: Using quality assessment to create common ground. Higher Education 57 (4): 405–415.
———. 2010. interdisciplinary environmental studies: A primer. New York: Wiley.
Öberg, G., Fortmann, L., and Gray, T. 2013. Is interdisciplinary research a mashup? IRES Working Paper Series No. 2013–02. Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability.
Pain, R. 2014. Impact: Striking a blow or working together? ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 13 (1): 19–23.
Panelli, R. 2010. More-than-human social geographies: Posthuman and other possibilities. Progress in Human Geography 34 (1): 79–87.
Ray, I. 2006. Outcomes and processes in economics and anthropology. Economic Development and Cultural Change 54 (3): 677–694.
Robbins, P., and B. Marks. 2010. Assemblage geographies. In The SAGE handbook of social geographies, ed. S. Smith, R. Pain, S. Marston, and J.P. Jones. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Sayre, N.F. 2015. The coyote-proof pasture experiment: How fences replaced predators and labor on US rangelands. Progress in Physical Geography 39 (5): 576–593.
Slaughter, S., and G. Rhoades. 2000. The neo-liberal university. New Labor Forum 6: 73–79.
Tacconi, L. 2011. Developing environmental governance research: The Example of forest cover change studies. Environmental Conservation 38 (2): 234–246.
Trompf, G.W. 2011. The classification of the sciences and the quest for interdisciplinarity: A brief history of ideas from ancient philosophy to contemporary environmental science. Environmental Conservation 38 (2): 113–126.
Tsing, A. 2014. More than human sociality. In Anthropology and nature, ed. K. Hastrup. New York: Routledge.
Whatmore, Sarah. 2002. Hybrid geographies: Natures, cultures, spaces. London: Sage Publications.
Whatmore, S.J. 2013. Where natural and social science meet? Reflections on an experiment in geographical practice. In Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the social and natural sciences, ed. A. Barry and G. Born, 161–177. London: Routledge.
Wodak, R., and P. Chilton, eds. 2005. A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis: Theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity. Vol. 13. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.