Race, Nature, Nation, and Property in the Origins of Range Science



Nomadic or itinerant livestock herding declined dramatically in the western United States between the 1870s and the 1930s. Historians have emphasized two causes of the decline: racial discrimination against herders and federal laws that restricted public lands grazing to owners of nearby private ranch properties. Range science played an important and overlooked intermediary role between these factors by linking the success of rangeland settlement to the purity of livestock breeds, the relative fitness of native versus non-native plants, and the supposed habits and traits of people of various types. Interconnected assumptions about race, nature, nation, and property were simultaneously incorporated into range research and euphemized via the norms and language of science itself. Producing range science as a science thus served to depoliticize and legitimize the dominance of land-owning, Anglo stockmen over western rangelands.


Range Science Western Rangelands Good Herd Sheep Owners Critical Physical Geography (CPG) 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



In writing this chapter, I benefited from generous and constructive feedback from many people, including Rebecca Lave, Christine Biermann, Diana Davis; participants in a seminar discussion hosted by University of California-Berkeley’s Social Science Matrix, including Bill Hanks, Carla Hesse, Marion Fourcade, Terry Regier, Lynsay Skiba, and Istvan Rev; and a number of graduate students with whom I am fortunate to work, including Christopher Lesser, Julia Sizek, Robert Parks, and Mike Simpson. The usual disclaimers apply.


  1. Behnke, Roy H., Ian Scoones, and Carol Kerven, eds. 1993. Range ecology at disequilibrium: New models of natural variability and pastoral adaptation in African Savannas. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Bentley, H.L. 1898. A report upon the grasses and forage plants of Central Texas. USDA Division of Agrostology Bulletin 10. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biermann, Christine. 2016. Securing forests from the scourge of chestnut blight: The biopolitics of nature and nation. Geoforum 75: 210–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brechin, Gray. 1996. Conserving the race: Natural aristocracies, eugenics, and the U.S. Conservation Movement. Antipode 28: 229–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carman, Ezra A., H.A. Heath, and John Minto. 1892. Special report on the history and present condition of the sheep industry of the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  6. Coville, Frederick Vernon. 1898. Forest growth and sheep grazing in the Cascade Mountains of Oregon. Bulletin no. 15. Washington, DC: USDA Division of Forestry.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crosby, Alfred W. 1986. Ecological imperialism: The biological expansion of Europe, 900–1900. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Curtiss, Charles F. 1898. Some essentials of beef production. USDA Farmer’s Bulletin No. 71. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, Diana K. 2007. Resurrecting the granary of Rome: Environmental history and French Colonial Expansion in North Africa. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  10. DeLuca, Kevin, and Anne Demo. 2001. Imagining nature and erasing class and race: Carleton Watkins, John Muir, and the construction of wilderness. Environmental History 6: 541–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galvin, Kathleen A., Robin S. Reid, R.H. Behnke, and N. Thompson Hobbs, eds. 2008. Fragmentation in Semi-Arid and arid landscapes: Consequences for human and natural systems. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Griffiths, David. 1902. Forage conditions on the Northern Border of the Great Basin. Bureau of Plant Industry Bulletin No. 15. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  13. Ingold, Tim. 1980. Hunters, pastoralists, and ranchers: Reindeer economies and their transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jardine, James T. 1908. Preliminary report on grazing experiments in a Coyote-Proof Pasture. Circular no. 156. USDA Forest Service: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 1909. Coyote-Proof pasture experiment, 1908. Circular no. 160. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service.Google Scholar
  16. Jordan, Terry G. 1993. North American cattle ranching frontiers: Origins, diffusion, and differentiation. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kennedy, P. Beveridge. 1900. Turkestan Alfalfa. Division of Agrostology Circular 25. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  18. Kloppenburg, Jack Ralph. 1988. First the seed: The political economy of Plant Biotechnology, 1492–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kosek, Jake. 2006. Understories: The political life of forests in Northern New Mexico. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marris, Emma. 2014. Rethinking predators: Legend of the wolf. Nature 507: 158–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McGregor, Alexander Campbell. 1982. Counting sheep: From open range to agribusiness on the Columbia Plateau. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  22. Merchant, Carolyn. 1980. The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  23. Meuret, Michel, and Fred Provenza, eds. 2014. The art and science of shepherding: Tapping the wisdom of French Herders. Trans. Bruce Inksetter and Melanie Guedenet. Austin, TX: Acres USA.Google Scholar
  24. Minto, John. 1902. Sheep husbandry in Oregon. The Quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society 3: 219–247.Google Scholar
  25. National Academy of Sciences. 1897. Report of the committee appointed by the National Academy of Sciences upon the inauguration of a forest policy for the forested lands of the United States to the Secretary of the Interior, May 1, 1897. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  26. Perkins, John. 1992. Up the trail from Dixie: Animosity toward sheep in the culture of the U.S. West. Australasian Journal of American Studies 11: 1–18.Google Scholar
  27. Pickrell, Charles U. 1925. The range bull. University of Arizona College of Agriculture Extension Service Circular No. 51. Tucson: University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  28. Rakestraw, Lawrence. 1958. Sheep grazing in the cascade range: John Minto vs. John Muir. Pacific Historical Review 27: 371–382.Google Scholar
  29. Ritvo, Harriet. 1987. The animal estate: The English and other creatures in the Victorian age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Sayre, Nathan F. 2002. Ranching, endangered species, and urbanization in the Southwest: Species of capital. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  31. ———. 2015. The coyote-proof pasture experiment: How fences replaced predators and labor on US Rangelands. Progress in Physical Geography 39: 576–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ———. 2017. The politics of scale: A history of rangeland science. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schelas, John. 2002. Race, ethnicity, and natural resources in the United States: A review. Natural Resources Journal 42: 723–763.Google Scholar
  34. Seed, Patricia. 1995. Ceremonies of possession in Europe’s conquest of the new world, 1492–1640. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sluyter, Andrew. 2012. Black ranching frontiers: African cattle herders of the Atlantic World, 1500–1900. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith, Jared G. 1895. A note on experimental grass gardens. USDA Division of Agrostology circular no. 1. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  37. Trow-Smith, Robert. 1959. A history of British livestock husbandry, 1700–1900. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  38. Vasey, George. 1884. The agricultural grasses of the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. ———. 1886. Report of an investigation of the grasses of the Arid Districts of Kansas, Nebraska, and Colorado. USDA Botanical Division Bulletin 1. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. White, Richard. 1994. Animals and enterprise. In The Oxford history of the American West, ed. Clyde A. Milner II, Carol A. O’Connor, and Martha A. Sandweiss, 237–273. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Wooton, E.O. 1908. The range problem in New Mexico. Bulletin no. 66. Albuquerque, NM: New Mexico College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts Agricultural Experiment Station.Google Scholar
  42. Worster, Donald. 1979. Dust bowl: The Southern Plains in the 1930s. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Wu, Jianguo, and O.L. Loucks. 1995. From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics. Quarterly Review of Biology 70: 439–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of California-BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations