Skip to main content

Independence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 814 Accesses

Abstract

The idea of statistical independence has cropped up once or twice already. It is such an important idea that it deserves a chapter for itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong JS (2001) Combining forecasts. In: Principles of forecasting: a handbook for researchers and practitioners. Springer, New York. pp 417−439. Available online at http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=marketing_papers. Accessed 22 Sept 2017

    Google Scholar 

  2. Koehler JJ (1997) One in Millions, billions and trillions: lessons from People v. Collins (1968) for People v Simpson (1995). J Legal Educ 47(2):214–223

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schneps L, Colmez C (2013) Math on trial: how numbers get used and abused in the courtroom, Chapter 2. Basic Books, New York, pp 23−38

    Google Scholar 

  4. Durant K, Smith MD (2007) Predicting the political sentiment of web log posts using supervised machine learning techniques coupled with feature selection. In: Nasraou O, Spiliopoulou M, Srivastava J, Mobasher B, Masand B (eds) Advances in web mining and web usage analysis. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4811. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 187–206

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Pang B, Lee L, Vaithyanathan S (2002) Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Programming (EMNLP 2002). pp 79–86. http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/llee/papers/sentiment.pdf Accessed 22 September 2017.

  6. Lewis DD (1998) Naive (Bayes) at forty: The independence assumption in information retrieval. In: Nédellec C, Rouveirol C (eds) Machine learning: ECML-98. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 1398. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 4–15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Domingos P, Pazzani M (1996) Beyond independence: conditions for the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier. In: Saitta L (ed) Machine learning, proceedings of the thirteenth international conference (ICML ‘96). Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, MA, pp 105–112

    Google Scholar 

  8. Matthews R (2000) Storks deliver babies (p = 0.0008). Teach Stat 22(2):36−38

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jessop, A. (2018). Independence. In: Let the Evidence Speak. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71392-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics