Abstract
Ecotourism, according to standard definitions, belongs in the sustainable tourism category. Not only is the concept of ecotourism now a buzzword, it is also a widely practiced concept around the world with managers of natural areas increasingly involved in the practice of ecotourism. The present study assesses the existing ecotourism practices found at the Pitawala Patana Forest Reserve in Sri Lanka using three criteria: responsible travel to natural areas, contribution to environmental conservation, and sustainment of the well-being of the local community. The study used a questionnaire survey and Participatory Rural Appraisal techniques for this assessment which reveal that ecotourism practices at the Pitawala Patana Forest Reserve currently constitute 52.54 percent overall of its practices, although benefits to the local community were not at a satisfactory level. The results indicate that visitors wish to experience new ecotourism-related activities, while the local community are interested in involvement in ecotourism at Pitawala Patana. Ecotourism concession development is a key policy decision that the study recommends that policy makers should take in order to ensure the well-being of the local community although this would entail some challenges. The findings suggest the need to develop and institute new rules, regulations, and standards for the operation of ecotourism at the Pitawala Patana Forest Reserve.
Ecotourism is a form of tourism involving visiting fragile, pristine, and relatively undisturbed natural areas, intended as a low-impact and often small-scale alternative to standard commercial (mass) tourism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Further Reading
Ashouri, P., and S. Fariyadi. 2010. Potential Assessment of Nature-Based Tourism Destinations Using MCA Techniques (Case Study: Lavasan-e Koochak). Journal of Environmental Studies 36 (55): 1.
Bambaradeniya, C.N., and S.P. Ekanayake. 2003. A Guide to the Biodiversity of Knuckles Forest Region. Sri Lanka: IUCN.
Bird, R., and B.T. Inman. 1968. Income Opportunities for Rural Families from Outdoor Recreation Enterprises, Agricultural Economic Report No. 68. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture/Economic Research Service/Resource Development Economics Division.
Boo, E. 1990. Ecotourism: The Potentials and Pitfalls. Vol. 1 and 2. Washington, DC: World Wildlife Fund.
Boyd, S.W., and R.W. Butler. 1996. Managing Ecotourism: An Opportunity Spectrum Approach. Tourism Management 17 (8): 557–566.
Buckley, R. 1994. A Framework for Ecotourism. Annals of Tourism Research 21 (3): 661–669.
Budowski, G. 1977. Tourism and Conservation: Conflict, Coexistence or Symbiosis? Parks 3–6: 1.
Ceballos-Lascurain, H. 1987. The Future of Ecotourism. Mexico Journal 1: 1.
Central Environmental Authority (CEA). 2007. National Enviromental Act. Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte: Central Environmental Authority.
Dearden, P., M. Bennett, and J. Johnstone. 2005. Trends in Global Protected Area Governance, 1992–2002. Environmental Management 36 (1): 89–100.
Eagles, P.F.J. 1997. International Ecotourism Management: Using Australia and Africa as Case Studies. Paper Prepared for the IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas, Protected Areas in the 21st Century: From Islands to Networks.
Elper Wood, M. 2002. Ecotourism: Principles, Practices and Policies for Sustainability. New York: United Nations Publications.
Forest Department. 1995. National Forest Policy. Rajamalwatte, Sri Lanka: Forest Department.
Heintzman, P. 1999. Spiritual Wellness: Theoretical Links and Leisure. Journal of Leisurability Ontario 26: 21–32.
Herath, G. 1996. Ecotourism Development in Australia. Annals of Tourism Research. Research Notes and Reports 23 (2): 442–446.
Linberg, K., J. Enriquez, and K. Sproule. 1996. Ecotourism Questioned: Case Studies from Belize. Annals of Tourism Research 23 (3): 543–562.
Mandziuk, G.W. 1995. Ecotourism: A Marriage of Conservation & Capitalism. Plan Canada 35: 29–33.
Mathieson, A., and G. Wall. 1982. Tourism: Economic, Physical, and Social Impacts. First ed. England: Longman Group Limited.
Moore, S., and B. Carter. 1993. Ecotourism in the 21st Century. Tourism Management 14 (2): 123–130.
Nelson, J.G. 1994. The Spread of Ecotourism: Some Planning Implications. Environmental Conservation 21 (3): 248–255.
Orams, M.B. 1995. Towards a More Desirable Form of Ecotourism. Tourism Management 16 (1): 3–8.
Sri Lanka Tourist Board (SLTB). 2003. Ecotourism Development Strategy of Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka: Sri Lanka Tourist Board.
Wickramasinghe, K., P. Steele, and A. Senarathne. 2006. Impact of Forest Conservation on Household Economy and Poverty: Case of Knuckles National Wilderness Heritage (NWH) of Sri Lanka. Colombo: Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka.
Wight, P.A. 1993. Improved Business Positioning: Environmentally Responsible Marketing of Ecotourism. In Expanding Responsibilities: A Blueprint for the Travel Industry. Proceedings of the 24th TTRA Conference, Whistler, British Columbia, 200–207, Travel and Tourism Research Association, Wheat Ridge, CO. June 13–16.
Yamane, T. 1967. Elementary Sampling Theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rathnayake, R.M.W. (2018). Is Ecotourism Sustainable? A Case Study from Sri Lanka. In: Brinkmann, R., Garren, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71389-2_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71389-2_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71388-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71389-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)