Transparency, Trust, and Multiculturalism in Cosy Copenhagen
This chapter employs Byung-Chul Han’s distinction between disciplinary and achievement subjects, and his critique of obsessive transparency, to examine two contradictory views of Denmark: as a law-abiding, democratic nation of trusting citizens and as a nation in the forefront of the recent European backlash against immigrants and multiculturalism. We look at political events, such as the Nørrebro Riots and the Danish Cartoon controversy, and recent legislation in order to highlight the subtly differing ways in which the Danish state trusts or mistrusts some of its citizens, and the role Islam plays in it. We note that the nature of ‘new xenophobia’ makes it easy to overlook that trust and accountability are not equally shared across the nation’s (multi)cultures.
- Han, Byung-Chul. 2015a. The Burnout Society. Trans. Erik Butler. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2015b. The Transparency Society. Trans. Erik Butler. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kogon, Eugen.  2006. The Theory and Practice of Hell: The German Concentration Camps and the System Behind Them. New York: Farra, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
- Luhmann, Niklas. 1979. Trust and Power. Chichester/New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Sterrett, Joseph. forthcoming. The King’s Ring: A Matter of Trust. In Shakespeare and Authority, ed. Angus Vine and Katherine Halsey, 1. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar