Advertisement

Constructing a New Imagery for the Muslim Woman: Symbolic Encounters and the Language of Radical Empowerment

  • Alaya Forte
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series book series ( CAL)

Abstract

This chapter explores how Western symbols of political belonging, such as the flag, are being used in contemporary Britain as tools to visually and visibly inform public debate on radicalisation. The campaign ‘Making A Stand,’ featured in The Sun and aimed at empowering British Muslim women to come together against Islamic State (IS), did just that. A closer analysis of this campaign, and the debates it generated, shows that it promoted a complex discourse on national belonging and the way in which British multiculturalism should be performed by Muslim (hijabi) women.

References

  1. Abu-Lughod, Lila. 2002. Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others. American Anthropologist 104 (3): 783–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, Sara. 2000. Strange Encounters. Embodied Others in Post-coloniality. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2004. Cultural Politics of Emotion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2007. Multiculturalism and the Promise of Happiness. New Formations 63 (1): 121–137.Google Scholar
  5. Ahmed, Zareen Roohi. 2012. The Role of Muslim Women in Britain in Relation to the Government’s ‘Prevent Agenda’. In Islam in the West: Key Issues in Multiculturalism, ed. M. Farrar, S. Robinson, Y. Valli, and P. Wetherli, 79–102. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ———. 2015. The Role of Muslim Women in Britain in Relation to the British Government’s Prevent Strategy, Dissertation. University of Aberdeen. Available at: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.675590.
  7. Allen, Chris, and Guru, Surinder. 2012. Between Political Fad and Political Empowerment: A Critical Evaluation of the National Muslim Women’s Advisory Group (NMWAG) and Governmental Processes of Engaging Muslim Women. Sociological Research Online 17 (3): 1–9. Available at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/17/3/17.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Anderson, Benedict. 2006. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  9. Barthes, Roland. 1972. Mythologies. Trans. Annette Laver. New York: The Noonday Press.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 2000. Camera Lucida. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  11. Birt, Yahya. 2009. Promoting Virulent Envy? Reconsidering the UK’s Terrorist Prevention Strategy. The RUSI Journal 154 (4): 52–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1989. Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory 7 (1): 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, Katherine E. 2013. Gender and Counter-Radicalization: Women and Emerging Counter-Terror Measures. In Gender, National Security and Counter-Terrorism: Human Rights Perspectives, ed. M.L. Satterthwaite and J.C. Huckerby, 36–59. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Dustin, Moira, and Anne Phillips. 2008. Whose Agenda Is It? Abuses of Women and Abuses of Culture in Britain. Ethnicities 8 (3): 405–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elshayyal, Khadijah. 2014. The Gender Imbalance in British Muslim Organisations (Public Spirit Project ‘Has UK Public Policy Succeeded in ‘Empowering’ Muslim Women?’). Available at: http://www.publicspirit.org.uk/the-gender-imbalance-in-british-muslim-organisations/. Accessed 23 June 2017.
  16. El-Tayeb, Fatima. 2011. European Others: Queering Ethnicity in Postnational Europe. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fukuyama, Francis. 1996. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  18. Giscard d’Estaing, Sophie. 2017. Engaging Women in Countering Violent Extremism: Avoiding Instrumentalisation and Furthering Agency. Gender & Development 25 (1): 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gohir, Shaista. 2010. Muslim Women Are Not Political Pawns. The Guardian, April 9 from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/apr/09/government-failed-muslim-women. Accessed 30 May 2017.
  20. Greenslade, Roy. 2014. The Sun Makes a Bold Bid to Prevent Brits Becoming Isis Recruits. The Guardian, October 8 from https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2014/oct/08/sun-isis. Accessed 30 May 2017.
  21. Groom, Nick. 2012. The Union Jack: The Story of the British Flag. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Gupta, Rahila, ed. 2003. From Homebreakers to Jailbreakers: Southall Black Sisters. New York/London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  23. Hardin, Russell. 2002. Trust and Trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Hosking, Geoffrey. 2014. Trust: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones, Stephen H., Therese O’Toole, Daniel Nilsson DeHanas, Tariq Modood, and Nasar Meer. 2014. Muslim Women’s Experiences of Involvement in UK Governance (Public Spirit Project ‘Has UK Public Policy Succeeded in ‘Empowering’ Muslim Women?’). Available at: http://www.publicspirit.org.uk/muslim-womens-experiences-of-involvement-in-uk-governance/. Accessed 23 June 2017.
  26. Joppke, Christian. 2004. The Retreat of Multiculturalism in the Liberal State: Theory and Policy. British Journal of Sociology 55 (2): 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Khalili, Laleh. 2011. Gendered Practices of Counterinsurgency. Review of International Studies 37 (4): 1471–1491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Khan, Sara. 2014. Retrieving the Equilibrium and Restoring Justice: Using Islam’s Egalitarian Teachings to Reclaim Women’s Rights. In Sensible Religion, ed. Christopher Lewis and Dan Cohn-Sherbok. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 2016. The Anti-Prevent Lobby Are Dominating the Discourse, Not All Muslims Oppose Prevent. LSE Religion and Public Sphere, February 7 from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/religionpublicsphere/2016/10/the-anti-prevent-lobby-are-dominating-the-discourse-not-all-muslims-oppose-prevent/. Accessed 31 May 2017.
  30. Korteweg, Anna, and Gökçe Yurdakul. 2014. The Headscarf Debates: Conflicts of National Belonging. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kundnani, Arun. 2012. Multiculturalism and Its Discontents: Left, Right and Liberal. European Journal of Cultural Studies 15 (2): 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kymlicka, Will. 2010. The Rise and Fall of Multiculturalism? New Debates on Inclusion and Accommodation in Diverse Societies. International Social Science Journal 61 (199): 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lentin, Alana, and Gavan Titley. 2011. The Crises of Multiculturalism: Racism in a Neoliberal Age. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  34. Lewicki, Aleksandra, and Therese O’Toole. 2017. Acts and Practices of Citizenship: Muslim Women’s Activism in the UK. Ethnic and Racial Studies 40 (1): 152–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Luhmann, Niklas. 1979. Trust and Power. Chichester: John Willey & Sons.Google Scholar
  36. Maira, Sunaina. 2009. “Good” and “Bad” Muslim Citizens: Feminists, Terrorists, and US Orientalisms. Feminist Studies 35 (3): 631–656.Google Scholar
  37. Malik, Nesrine. 2014. The Sun’s ‘Unite Against Isis’ Campaign Is a Proxy for anti-Muslim Bigotry. The Guardian, October 8 from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/oct/08/sun-unite-against-isis-muslim-bigotry. Accessed 30 May 2017.
  38. Mohanty, Chandra. 1988. Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses. Feminist Review 30: 61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morey, Peter, and Yasmin Alibhai-Brown. 2017. Trust and the Prevent Duty, PaCCS Policy Briefing. Available at http://www.paccsresearch.org.uk/policy-briefings/trust-and-the-prevent-duty/. Accessed 30 July 2017.
  40. Morey, Peter, and Amina Yaqin. 2011. Framing Muslims. Stereotyping and Representation After 9/11. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. O’Hara, Kieron. 2004. Trust: From Socrates to Spin. Cambridge: Icon Books.Google Scholar
  42. O’Neill, Onora. 2002. A Question of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. O’Toole, Therese, Daniel Nilsson DeHanas, and Tariq Modood. 2012. Balancing Tolerance, Security and Muslim Engagement in the United Kingdom: The Impact of the ‘Prevent’ Agenda. Critical Studies on Terrorism 5 (3): 373–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Okin, Susan Moller. 1999. Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? In Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? ed. J. Cohen, M. Howard, and M.C. Nussbaum, 7–26. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Pathan, Nabila. 2014. Does UK #UnitedAgainstIS Drive, Demonize or Empower Muslims? Al Arabiya News, October 14 from https://english.alarabiya.net/en/variety/2014/10/14/UK-UnitedAgainstIS-campaign-launches-to-mixed-Muslim-reactions.html. Accessed 30 May 2017.
  46. Phillips, Anne, and Sawitri Saharso. 2008. Guest Editorial: The Rights of Women and the Crisis of Multiculturalism. Ethnicities 8 (3): 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  48. Puar, Jasbir K. 2006. Mapping US Homonormativities. Gender, Place & Culture 13 (1): 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rashid, Naaz. 2014. Giving the Silent Majority a Stronger Voice? Initiatives to Empower Muslim Women as Part of the UK’s ‘War on Terror’. Ethnic and Racial Studies 37 (4): 589–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. ———. 2016. Veiled Threats. Representing ‘the Muslim Woman’ in UK Public Policy Discourses. Bristol/Chicago: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  51. Razack, Sherene. 2007. Casting Out: The Eviction of Muslims from Western Law and Politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  52. Reichl, Susanne. 2004. Flying the Flag: The Intricate Semiotics of National Identity. European Journal of English Studies 8 (2): 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Roy, Olivier. 2004. Globalised Islam. The Search for a New Umma. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  54. ———. 2007. Islam in Europe. Eurozine, May 3. Available at: http://www.eurozine.com/islam-in-europe/. Accessed 30 May 2017.
  55. Runnymede Trust Commission. 2000. The Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  56. Sanghani, Radhinka. 2014. Theresa May: ‘British Muslim Women Must Challenge Extremism and Fight the Islamic State. The Telegraph, September 24 from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-politics/11118828/Theresa-May-British-Muslim-women-must-challenge-extremism-and-fight-the-Islamic-State.html. Accessed 30 May 2017.
  57. Scott, Joan Wallach. 2007. The Politics of the Veil. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Seligman, Adam B. 2000. The Problem of Trust. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Spivak, Chakravorty Spivak. 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, ed. C. Nelson and L. Grossberg, 271–313. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. ———. 1999. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Sztompka, Piotr. 1999. Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Thomas, Paul. 2012. Responding to the Threat of Violent Extremism: Failing to Prevent. London: A&C Black.Google Scholar
  63. Vertovec, Steven, and Susanne Wessendorf, eds. 2010. Multiculturalism Backlash: European Discourses, Policies and Practices. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Wadia, Kursheed. 2015. Women from Muslim Communities in Britain: Political and Civic Activism in the 9/11 Era. In Muslims and Political Participation in Britain, ed. T. Peace, 85–102. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. We Will Inspire. 2015a. http://www.wewillinspire.com/making-a-stand/. Accessed 30 May 2017.
  66. ———. 2015b. http://www.wewillinspire.com/about-us/. Accessed 30 May 2017.
  67. Young, Iris Marion. 2003. The Logic of Masculinist Protection: Reflections on the Current Security State. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 29 (1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alaya Forte
    • 1
  1. 1.SOAS University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations