Advertisement

Being Participatory Through the Use of App-Based Research Tools

  • Sophie Hadfield-Hill
  • Cristiana Zara
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter considers the practical and ethical complexities of participatory, app-based research with children and young people. Technological advances offer social science researchers new tools to explore young people’s lives, be it their mobilities, routines, health or relationships with people and space. As researchers we need to carefully consider the conception, design and application of such methodologies, to ensure they are both ethical and appropriate. Here we consider the mobile research application Map My Community to highlight the advantages and challenges associated with participatory app-based research, advocating for an approach where young participants are co-designers, co-analysers and co-disseminators of app-based tools and data.

Keywords

Mobile app Participatory Young people Technology Qualitative research 

References

  1. 1.
    Groundwater-Smith S, Dockett S, Bottrell D. Participatory research with children and young people. London: Sage; 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Souza e Silva A, Frith J. Locational privacy in public spaces: media discourses on location-aware mobile technologies. Commun Cult Critiq. 2010;3(4):503–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gilmore JN. Everywear: the quantified self and wearable fitness technologies. New Media Soc. 2016;18(11):2524–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lim SS, Soriano C, editors. Asian perspectives on digital culture: emerging phenomena, enduring concepts. New York: Routledge; 2016.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sheller M, Urry J, editors. Mobile technologies of the city. London: Routledge; 2006.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Halfpenny P, Procter R. Innovations in digital research methods. London: Sage; 2015.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roberts S, Snee H, Hine C, Morey Y., Watson H, editors. Digital methods for social science: an interdisciplinary guide to research innovation. Palgrave Macmillan; 2016.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hesse-Biber SN, editor. The handbook of emergent technologies in social research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Collste G. “Under my skin”: the ethics of ambient computing for personal health monitoring. In: Hesse-Biber SN, editor. The handbook of emergent technologies in social research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 89–110.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Murthy D. Emergent digital ethnographic methods for social research. In: Hesse-Biber SN, editor. The handbook of emergent technologies in social research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 158–79.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morgan DL, Lobe B. Online focus groups. In: Hesse-Biber SN, editor. The handbook of emergent technologies in social research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 199–230.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Little B. Data mining and research: applied mathematics reborn. In: Hesse-Biber SN, editor. The handbook of emergent technologies in social research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 394–411.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gubrium A, Nat Turner K. Digital storytelling as an emergent method for social research and practice. In: Hesse-Biber SN, editor. The handbook of emergent technologies in social research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 469–91.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eagle N. Mobile phones as sensors for social research. In: Hesse-Biber SN, editor. The handbook of emergent technologies in social research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 492–521.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Livingstone S, Third A. Children and young people’s rights in the digital age: an emerging agenda. New Media Soc. 2017;19(5):657–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oates C, Oates C, Watkins L, Watkins L, Thyne M, Thyne M. Editorial: the impact of marketing on children’s well-being in a digital age. Eur J Mark. 2016;50(11):1969–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    House of Lords. Growing up with the internet, 2nd report of session 2016–2017, Published by the Authority of the House of Lords. 2017. https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201617/ldselect/ldcomuni/130/130.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2017.
  18. 18.
    Louv R. The nature principle: reconnecting with life in a virtual age. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books; 2012.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Staiano AE, Calvert SL. Digital gaming and pediatric obesity: at the intersection of science and social policy. Soc Issues Policy Rev. 2012;6(1):54–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schilling D. Is Pokemon Go the answer to America’s obesity problem? 2016. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/13/is-pokemon-go-the-answer-to-obesity-america. Accessed 8 Dec 17.
  21. 21.
    Lee B. Pokemon go is going, going, gone as a physical activity fad. Forbes Online. 2016. https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2016/12/14/pokemon-go-going-going-gone-as-a-physical-activity-fad/#4e804b231312. Accessed 10 Mar 2017.
  22. 22.
    Castells M, et al. Mobile communication and society: a global perspective. London: MIT Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mizen P, Hutchby I, Pole CJ, Moran-Ellis J, Bolton A. Children, technology, and culture: the impacts of technologies in children’s everyday lives. Hove: Psychology Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pain R, Grundy S, Gill S, Towner E, Sparks G, Hughes K. ‘So long as I take my mobile’: mobile phones, urban life and geographies of young people’s safety. Int J Urban Reg Res. 2005;29(4):814–30.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Plowman L, McPake J, Stephen C. The technologisation of childhood? Young children and technology in the home. Child Soc. 2010;24(1):63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mikkelsen MR, Christensen P. Is children’s independent mobility really independent? A study of children’s mobility combining ethnography and GPS/mobile phone technologies 1. Mobilities. 2009;4(1):37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Porter G, Hampshire K, Abane A, Munthali A, Robson E, Mashiri M, Tanle A. Youth, mobility and mobile phones in Africa: findings from a three-country study. Inf Technol Dev. 2012;18(2):145–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jarvis CH, Kraftl P, Dickie J. (Re) Connecting spatial literacy with children’s geographies: GPS, Google Earth and children’s everyday lives. Geoforum. 2017;81:22–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Latour B. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Prout A. Actor-network theory, technology and medical sociology: an illustrative analysis of the metered dose inhaler. Sociol Health Ill. 1996;18(2):198–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ergler C, et al. Digital methodologies and practices in children’s geographies. Child Geogr. 2016;14(2):129–40. Special issueCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jones O, Williams M, Fleuriot C. ‘A new sense of place?’ Mobile ‘wearable’ information and communications technology devices and the geographies of urban childhood. Child Geogr. 2003;1(2):165–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Christensen P, Mikkelsen M, Nielsen TAS, Harder H. Children, mobility and space: using GPS and mobile phone technologies in ethnographic research. J Mix Methods Res. 2011;5(3):227–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hadfield-Hill S, Horton J. Children’s experiences of participating in research: emotional moments together? Child Geogr. 2014;12(2):135–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ergler C. Beyond passive participation: children as collaborators in understanding neighbourhood experience. Grad J Asia-Pac Stud. 2011;7(2):78–98.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Danby S, Davidson C, Ekberg S, Breathnach H, Thorpe K. ‘Let’s see if you can see me’: making connections with Google Earth in a preschool classroom. Child Geogr. 2016;14(2):141–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Freeman C, van Heezik Y, Stein A, Hand K. Technological inroads into understanding city children’s natural life-words. Child Geogr. 2016;14(2):158–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Korson C. Political Agency and Citizen Journalism: Twitter as a tool of evaluation. Prof Geogr. 2014;67(3):1–10.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Duncan DT, Meline J, Kestens Y, Day K, Elbel B, Trasande L, Chaix B. Walk score, transportation mode choice, and walking among French adults: a GPS study, accelerometer, and mobility survey study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(6):611.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chaiz B, Meline J, Duncan S, Merrien C, Karusisi N, Perchoux C, Lewin A, Labadi K, Kestens Y. GPS tracking in neighbourhood and health studies: a step forward for environmental exposure assessment, a step backward for causal inference? Health Place. 2013;21:46–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lachowycz K, Jones AP, Page AS, Wheeler BW, Cooper AR. What can global positioning systems tell us about the contribution of different types of urban greenspace to children’s physical activity? Health Place. 2012;18:586–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rodriguez DA, Cho GH, Evenson KR, Conway TL, Cohen D, Ghosh-Dastidar B, Pickrel JL, Veblen-Mortenson S, Lytle LA. Out and about: association of the built environment with physical activity behaviors of adolescent females. Health Place. 2012;18:55–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sadler R, Clark AF, Wilk P, O’Connor C, Gilliland J. Using GPS and activity tracking to reveal the influence of adolescents’ food environment exposure on junk food purchasing. Can J Public Health. 2016;107:14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Horton J, Christensen P, Kraftl P, Hadfield-Hill S. ‘Walking ... just walking’: how children and young people’s everyday pedestrian practices matter. Soc Cult Geogr. 2013;15(1):94–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Holloway SL. Changing children’s geographies. Child Geogr. 2014;12(4):377–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Horton J, Kraftl P. What else? Some more ways of thinking and doing ‘children’s geographies. Child Geogr. 2006;4(01):69–95.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hadfield-Hill S, Zara C. Final report: new urbanisms in India: urban living, sustainability and everyday life. Birmingham: University of Birmingham; 2017.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Apple. ResearchKit and CareKit: Empowering medical researchers, doctors, and you. 2017. https://www.apple.com/uk/researchkit/. Accessed 8 Dec 2017.
  49. 49.
    Joorabchi ME, Mesbah A, Kruchten P. Real challenges in mobile app development. In: Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 2013 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on (p. 15–24). IEEE; 2013.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bryman A. Social research methods. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2015.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Nebeker C, Lagare T, Takemoto M, Lewars B, Crist K, Bloss CS, Kerr J. Engaging research participants to inform the ethical conduct of mobile imaging, pervasive sensing, and location tracking research. Transl Behav Med. 2016;6(4):577–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Richards L. Handling qualitative data: a practical guide. London: Sage; 2014.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kitchin R. The data revolution: big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. London: Sage; 2014.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Nasar JL, Troyer D. Pedestrian injuries due to mobile phone use in public places. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;57:91–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Barbovschi M, O’Neill B, Velicu A, Mascheroni G. Policy recommendations: report D5.1. Milan: Net Children Go Mobile; 2014.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Stald G, Green L, Barbovski M, Haddon L, Mascheroni G, Ságvári B, Scifo B, Tsaliki L. Online on the mobile: internet use on smartphones and associated risks among youth in Europe. London: EU Kids Online, LSE; 2014.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Bitou A, Waller T. Participatory research with very young children. In: Waller T, Arlemalm-Hagser E, Sandseter E, Hansen B, Lee-Hammond L, Lekies K, Wyver S, editors. The SAGE handbook of outdoor play and learning. London: Sage; 2017. Chapter 27.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Cahill C. Doing research with young people: participatory research and the rituals of collective work. Child Geogr. 2007;5(3):297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Vindrola-Padros C, Martins A, Coyne I, Bryan G, Gibson F. From informed consent to dissemination: using participatory visual methods with young people with long-term conditions at different stages of research. Glob Public Health. 2016;11(5–6):636–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    De Souza e Silva A. Location-aware mobile technologies: historical, social and spatial approaches. Mobile Media Commun. 2013;1(1):116–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Wilkinson S. Hold the phone! Culturally credible research ‘with’ young people. Child Geogr. 2016;14(2):232–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Mallan KM, Singh P, Giardina N. The challenges of participatory research with ‘tech-savvy’youth. J Youth Stud. 2010;13(2):255–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Williams J, Townsend N, Duncan G, Drewnowski A. Participant experience using GPS devices in a food environment and nutrition study. J Hung Environ Nutr. 2016;11(3):414–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations