Advertisement

Vascular Anomalies

  • Giuseppe Micali
  • Anna Elisa Verzì
  • Maria Letizia Musumeci
  • Francesco Lacarrubba
Chapter

Abstract

Vascular anomalies include hemangiomas and vascular malformations. Hemangiomas have a typical presentation and growth pattern which correspond to three developing stages: proliferation, quiescence, and involution; at dermatoscopy they show sharply demarcated and red round-oval structures associated with polymorphous vessels with or without blue-whitish septa. Vascular malformations are present at birth and never completely regress; they are dermatoscopically characterized by red-dotted, globular vessels (type 1 or superficial), networks of dilated linear vessels (type 2 or deep), and/or roundish/sacular/glomerular structures (type 3).

Keywords

Hemangiomas Congenital hemangiomas Infantile hemangiomas Vascular malformations Salmon patches Port-wine stain Lacunae Septa Vascular pattern Linear vessels Globular vessels Glomerular vessels 

References

  1. 1.
    Wassef M, Blei F, Adams D, Alomari A et al (2015) ISSVA Board and Scientific Committee. Vascular anomalies classification: recommendations from the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies. Pediatrics 136:e203–e214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Theiler M, Wälchli R, Weibel L (2013) Vascular anomalies-a practical approach. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 11:397–405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kilcline C, Frieden IJ (2008) Infantile hemangiomas: how common are they? A systematic review of the medical literature. Pediatr Dermatol 25:168–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson KR, Schoch JJ, Lohse CM et al (2016) Increasing incidence of infantile hemangiomas (IH) over the past 35 years: Correlation with decreasing gestational age at birth and birth weight. J Am Acad Dermatol 74:120–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Richter GT, Friedman AB (2012) Hemangiomas and vascular malformations: current theory and management. Int J Pediatr 2012:645678CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Del Pozo J, Gómez-Tellado M, López-Gutiérrez JC (2012) Vascular malformations in childhood. Actas Dermosifiliogr 103:661–678CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kollipara R, Dinneen L, Rentas KE et al (2013) Current classification and terminology of pediatric vascular anomalies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:1124–1135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elluru RG (2013) Cutaneous vascular lesions. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 21:111–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oiso N, Kawada A (2011) The dermoscopic features in infantile hemangioma. Pediatr Dermatol 28:591–593CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oiso N, Kimura M, Kawara S et al (2011) Clinical, dermoscopic and histopathologic features in a case of infantile hemangioma without proliferation. Pediatr Dermatol 28:66–68CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haliasos EC, Kerner M, Jaimes N et al (2013) Dermoscopy for the pediatric dermatologist, part II: dermoscopy of genetic syndromes with cutaneous manifestations and pediatric vascular lesions. Pediatr Dermatol 30:172–181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grazzini M, Stanganelli I, Rossari S et al (2012) Dermoscopy, confocal laser microscopy, and hi-tech evaluation of vascular skin lesions: diagnostic and therapeutic perspectives. Dermatol Ther 25:297–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eubanks LE, McBurney EI (2001) Videomicroscopy of port-wine stains: correlation of location and depth of lesion. J Am Acad Dermatol 44:948–951CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vazquez-Lopez, Manjón-Haces JA, Vázquez-López AC, Pérez-Oliva N (2003) The hand-held dermatoscope improves the clinical evaluation of port-wine stains. J Am Acad Dermatol 48:984–985CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Procaccini EM, Argenziano G, Staibano S et al (2001) Epiluminescence microscopy for port-wine stains: pretreatment evaluation. Dermatology 30:329–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sevila A, Nagore E, Botella-Estrada R et al (2004) Videomicroscopy of venular malformations (port-wine stain type): prediction of response to pulsed dye laser. Pediatr Dermatol 21:589–596CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Motley RJ, Lanigan SW, Katugampola GA (1997) Videomicroscopy predicts outcome in treatment of port-wine stains. Arch Dermatol 133:921–922CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuseppe Micali
    • 1
  • Anna Elisa Verzì
    • 1
  • Maria Letizia Musumeci
    • 1
  • Francesco Lacarrubba
    • 1
  1. 1.Dermatology ClinicUniversity of CataniaCataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations