Advertisement

A Focus on IR and Decision Support in the UK, Ireland, Germany, and The Netherlands

  • James WilliamsEmail author
  • David Kane
Chapter
Part of the Knowledge Studies in Higher Education book series (KSHE, volume 4)

Abstract

Institutional research takes place in Ireland, the UK, Netherlands, and Germany and is a significant activity because decision making by institution leaders is informed by data collection; certainly teaching and learning is evidence-based rather than what academics think ‘ought to be the case’; services and facilities are changed on the basis of evidence; even (at least in theory) staff and student satisfaction is taken into account during improvement processes. However, IR is currently not recognized as a discrete activity, resulting in institutional research being done by lots of different groups, internal and external; rather than by a centralized office. Knowledge-building with senior administrators about IR, additional professional development for practitioners, and coordinated thinking will strengthen IR and decision support in the region.

References

  1. Birmingham City University. (2017a). Planning and performance department. Resource document. https://icity.bcu.ac.uk/apd. Accessed 8 June 2017.
  2. Birmingham City University. (2017b). Centre for excellence in learning and teaching. Resource document. http://www.bcu.ac.uk/about-us/celt. Accessed 12 June 2017.
  3. Borden, V. M. H., & Webber, K. L. (2015). Institutional and educational research in higher education: Common origins, diverging practices. In K. Webber & A. Calderon (Eds.), Institutional research and planning in higher education (pp. 41–53). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Harvey, L. (2003). Student feedback. Quality in Higher Education, 9(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hathaway, R. (1995). Assumptions underlying quantitative and qualitative research: Implications for institutional research. Research in Higher Education, 36(5), 535–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Huisman, J., Hoekstra, P., & Yorke, M. (2015). Institutional research in Europe: A view from the European association for institutional research. In K. Webber & A. Calderon (Eds.), Institutional research and planning in higher education (pp. 58–70). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Kane, D., Williams, J., & Cappuccini-Ansfield, G. (2008). Student satisfaction surveys: The value in taking an historical perspective. Quality in Higher Education, 14(2), 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kings College London. (2017). Analytics..Resource document. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/aboutkings/facts/psa/index.aspx. Accessed 17 June 2017.
  9. Klemenčič, M. (2016). The role of institutional research in positioning universities. In R. M. O. Pritchard, A. Pausits, & J. Williams (Eds.), Positioning higher education: From here to there (pp. 3–18). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Klemenčič, M., & Brennan, J. (2013). Institutional research in a European context: A forward look. European Journal of Higher Education, 3(3), 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. MARiHE. (2017). MARiHE: Description and objectives. Resource document. http://www.marihe.eu/programs/description-and-objectives. Accessed 12 June 2017.
  12. Neave, G. (2003). Institutional research: From case study to strategic instrument. In R. Begg (Ed.), The dialogue between higher education research and practice (pp. 3–14). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Scott, D., Brown, A., Lunt, I., & Thorne, T. (2004). Professional doctorates: Integrating professional and academic knowledge. Buckingham: Society for Research in Higher Education and the Open University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Taylor, J. (2015). The evolution of institutional research: Maturity models of institutional research and decision support and possible directions for the future. In K. L. Webber & A. J. Calderon (Eds.), Institutional research and planning in higher education: Global contexts and themes (pp. 213–228). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Teichler, U. (2005). Research on higher education. European Journal of Education, 40(4), 447–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Terenzini, P. T. (2013). “On the nature of institutional research” revisited: Plus ça change …? Research in Higher Education, 54, 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tight, M. (2012). Researching higher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  18. University College Dublin. (2017). UCD institutional research..Resource document. http://www.ucd.ie/quality/otherucdresources/ucdinstitutionalresearch/. Accessed 8 June 2017.
  19. University of Hamburg. (2017). Higher education programme. Resource document. https://www.uni-hamburg.de/en/campuscenter/studienangebot/studiengang.html? 1115114810. Accessed 12 June 2017.
  20. University of Kent. (2017). Planning and business information office. Resource document. https://www.kent.ac.uk/planning/. Accessed 8 June 2017.
  21. University of Manchester. (2017). Directorate of planning. Resource document. http://www.staffnet.manchester.ac.uk/planning/aboutus/. Accessed 08 June 2017.
  22. University of Osnabruck. (2017). Research service. Resource document. https://www.uni-osnabrueck.de/en/research/service.html. Accessed 10 June 2017.
  23. University of Speyer. (2017). Masterstudium Wissenschaftsmanagement in Speyer..Resourcedocument. http://www.uni-speyer.de/de/studium/wissenschaftsmanagement-mpa/begruessung.php. Accessed 12 June 2017.
  24. University of Warwick. (2017). Learning and development centre. Resource document. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/ldc/about. Accessed 12 June 2017.
  25. Volkwein, J. F. (2008). The foundations and evolution of institutional research. In D. Terkla (Ed.), Institutional research: More than just data, New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 141 (pp. 5–20). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  26. Wellington, J., & Sikes, P. (2006). A doctorate in a tight compartment: Why do students choose a professional doctorate and what impact does it have on their personal and professional lives? Studies in Higher Education, 31(6), 723–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Williams, J. (2011). Action and feedback cycle. In C. S. Nair, A. Patil, & P. Mertova (Eds.), Student feedback: The cornerstone to an effective quality assurance system in higher education (pp. 143–158). Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Winter, M., & Krempkow, R. (2013). Kartierung der hochschulforschung in Deutschland 2013: Bestandsaufnahme der hochschulforschenden einrichtungen. Berlin.Google Scholar
  29. Woodfield, S. (2015). Institutional research in the UK and Ireland. In K. Webber & A. Calderon (Eds.), Institutional research and planning in higher education (pp. 86–100). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Yorke, M. (2016). Peregrinations. Keynote presented at the HEIR Network Forum, September 2016, Edinbrough, Scotland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Birmingham City UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations