Plans Versus Situated Actions in Immersive Storytelling Practices

  • Sarah Lugthart
  • Michel van Dartel
  • Annemarie Quispel
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10690)

Abstract

While much research on immersive storytelling practices is focused on outcomes and audience experiences, much less attention has hitherto been given to research on the relationship of such outcomes and experiences to the design process. In this paper, we introduce the distinction between two modes of design to the domain of immersive storytelling: ‘plans’ and ‘situated actions’. In a small comparative case study, we investigate how these two modes of design affect the creative outcomes of the design process of immersive stories and their reception. The case study reveals important relations between the method chosen to design an immersive story and aspects of the outcomes of such design processes, which emphasizes the importance of the mode of design in creating immersive stories.

Keywords

Immersive storytelling Situated action Design methods 

References

  1. 1.
    Ryan, M.: Narrative as Virtual Reality 2: Revisiting Immersion and Interactivity. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rose, F.: The Art of Immersion. How the Digital Generation is Remaking Hollywood, Madison Avenue and the Way we tell Stories. W.W. Norton & Company, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Newton, K.: The storyteller’s guide to the Virtual Reality audience. https://medium.com/stanford-d-school/the-storyteller-s-guide-to-the-virtual-reality-audience-19e92da57497. Accessed 22 Jul 2017
  4. 4.
    Suchman, L.: Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Interaction. Xerox Corporation, Palo Alto (1987)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Simonsen, J., Svabo, C., Strandvad, S., Samson, K., Hertzum, M., Hansen, O. (eds.): Situated Design Methods. MIT Press, Cambridge (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kristiansen, E.: Alternate reality games. In: Simonsen, J., Svabo, C., Strandvad, S., Samson, K., Hertzum, M., Hansen, O. (eds.) Situated Design Methods, pp. 241–258. MIT Press, Cambridge (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Machon, J.: Immersive Theater: Intimacy and Immediacy in Contemporary Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dolan, D., Bye, K.: Four different types of stories in VR. http://voicesofvr.com/292-the-four-different-types-of-stories-in-vr/. Accessed 22 Jul 2017
  9. 9.
    Long, B., Schenk, S.: The Digital Filmmaking Handbook, 4th edn. Cengage Learning, Boston (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redstrom, J., Wensveen, S.: Design Research Through Practice: From the Lab, Field and Showroom. Elsevier, Waltham (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah Lugthart
    • 1
  • Michel van Dartel
    • 1
  • Annemarie Quispel
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre of Expertise for Art, Design and TechnologyAvans University of Applied SciencesBredaThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations