Advertisement

Does Gender Matter? Female Politicians’ Engagement in Anti-corruption Efforts

  • Amy C. Alexander
  • Andreas Bågenholm
Chapter
Part of the Political Corruption and Governance book series (PCG)

Abstract

The research on gender and corruption has shown a positive link between the percentage of women in elected office and lower levels of corruption. This research has not focused much on the individual-level behavior of MPs but has nevertheless assumed individual-level mechanisms behind this link. Thus, there is a need to open this “black box” in order to find out whether female politicians actually engage successfully in anti-corruption efforts and to a higher extent than men. In this chapter we investigate whether female politicians have politicized corruption more often than men in election campaigns during the last twenty-five years. The results show that even though female candidates tend to politicize corruption more frequently, they rarely make it to a position powerful enough to influence policies directly.

References

  1. Alexander, A. C., & Ravlik, M. (2015). Responsiveness to women’s interests as a quality of government mechanism: A global analysis of women’s presence in national legislatures and anti-trafficking enforcement. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association’s Annual Meeting, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  2. Bågenholm, A. (2013). The electoral fate and policy impact of ‘anti-corruption parties’ in Central and Eastern Europe. Human Affairs, 23(2), 174–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bågenholm, A., & Charron, N. (2014). Do politics in Europe benefit from politicising corruption? West European Politics, 37(5), 903–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauhr, M., Wängnerud, L., & Charron, N. (2017). Exclusion or interests? Petty corruption, favoritism, and the role of female representatives. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association’s Annual Meeting, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  5. Bjarnegård, E. (2013). Gender, informal institutions and political recruitment: Explaining male dominance in parliamentary representation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Branisa, B., & Ziegler, M. (2010). Re-examining the link between gender and corruption: The role of social institutions. Discussion paper no. 24. Göttingen: Current Research Centre.Google Scholar
  7. Dollar, D., Fisman, R., & Gatti, R. (2001). Are women really the fairer sex? Corruption and women in government. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization, 46, 423–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Electoral Studies Election Reports 2000–2016.Google Scholar
  9. Esarey, J., & Chirillo, G. (2013). ‘Fairer sex’ or purity myth? Corruption, gender, and institutional context. Politics & Gender, 9, 361–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Esarey, J., & Schwindt-Bayer, L. (2017a). Women’s representation, accountability, and corruption in democracies. British Journal of Political Science. 1–32. Published online 26 January 2017.Google Scholar
  11. Esarey, J., & Schwindt-Bayer, L. (2017b). Estimating causal relationships between women’s representation in government and corruption (manuscript under review for publication).Google Scholar
  12. Goetz, A. M. (2007). Political cleaners: Women as the new anti-corruption force? Development and Change, 38(1), 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jha, C. K., & Sarangi, S. (2015). Women and corruption. What positions must they hold to make a difference? Working paper. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2434912
  14. Rothstein, B., & Tannenberg, M. (2015). Making development work: The quality of government approach. Swedish Government Expert Group for Aid Studies. Report 2015:17.Google Scholar
  15. Stensöta, H. O., Wängnerud, L., & Svensson, R. (2015). Gender and corruption: The mediating power of institutional logics. Governance, 28(4), 475–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sundström, A., & Wängnerud, L. (2016). Corruption as an obstacle to women’s political representation: Evidence from local councils in 18 European countries. Party Politics, 22(3), 354–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sung, H.-E. (2003). Fairer sex or fairer system? Gender and corruption revisited. Social Forces, 82(2), 703–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Swamy, A., Knack, S., Lee, Y., & Azfar, O. (2001). Gender and corruption. Journal of Development Economics, 64(1), 25–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vijayalakshmi, V. (2008). Rent-seeking and gender in local governance. Journal of Development Studies, 44(9), 1262–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wikipedia webpages for parliamentary elections in Europe 1990–2015 and presidential elections in Latin America 2000–2014.Google Scholar
  21. World Bank. (2001). Engendering development: Through gender equality in rights, resources and voice. A World Bank policy research report. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amy C. Alexander
    • 1
  • Andreas Bågenholm
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations