Enabling Analysis of User Engagements Across Multiple Online Communication Channels

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 755)


The role of online communication channels, especially social media, has been developed from a platform for sharing information to a platform for influencing audiences. With the intention to reach the widest audience possible, organizations tend to distribute their marketing information to as many communication channels as possible. After that, they measure the performance of their marketing activities on every channel, where the typical measurement on how users perceived information is through engagement indicators. Measuring engagements across channels is challenging because the heterogeneity of engagement mechanism that can be performed by users on every channel. In this paper, we introduce a method to enable an analysis of those heterogeneous engagements which are distributed on multiple online communication channels. The solution consists of a conceptual model to uniformly representing user engagements on every channel. The model enables user engagements integration across channels, such that a more advanced user engagements analysis can be performed. We show how to apply our solution to analyze wide variety user engagements on popular social media channels from the tourism industry. This work brings us a step closer to realize an integrated multi-channel online communication solution.


User engagement Multi-channel Data integration Data analysis 



This work was partially supported by the EU project EUTravel. We would like to thank all the members of the Online Communication ( working group for their valuable feedback.


  1. 1.
    Agichtein, E., Castillo, C., Donato, D., Gionis, A., Mishne, G.: Finding high-quality content in social media. In: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM 2008, pp. 183–194. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akbar, Z., García, J.M., Toma, I., Fensel, D.: On using semantically-aware rules for efficient online communication. In: Bikakis, A., Fodor, P., Roman, D. (eds.) RuleML 2014. LNCS, vol. 8620, pp. 37–51. Springer, Cham (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akbar, Z., Toma, I., Fensel, D.: Optimizing the publication flow of touristic service providers on multiple social media channels. In: Inversini, A., Schegg, R. (eds.) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2016, pp. 211–224. Springer, Cham (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O., et al.: The semantic web. Sci. Am. 284(5), 28–37 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bilgihan, A., Okumus, F., Nusair, K., Bujisic, M.: Online experiences: flow theory, measuring online customer experience in e-commerce and managerial implications for the lodging industry. Inf. Technol. Tour. 14(1), 49–71 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bontcheva, K., Rout, D.: Making sense of social media streams through semantics: a survey. Sem. Web 5(5), 373–403 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Breslin, J., Decker, S.: The future of social networks on the internet: the need for semantics. IEEE Internet Comput. 11(6), 86–90 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Breslin, J.G., Harth, A., Bojars, U., Decker, S.: Towards semantically-interlinked online communities. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) ESWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3532, pp. 500–514. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Calder, B.J., Malthouse, E.C., Schaedel, U.: An experimental study of the relationship between online engagement and advertising effectiveness. J. Interact. Mark. 23(4), 321–331 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fan, W., Gordon, M.D.: The power of social media analytics. Commun. ACM 57(6), 74–81 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fensel, A., Akbar, Z., Toma, I., Fensel, D.: Bringing online visibility to hotels with and multi-channel communication. In: Inversini, A., Schegg, R. (eds.) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2016, pp. 3–16. Springer, Cham (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Finin, T., Ding, L., Zhou, L., Joshi, A.: Social networking on the semantic web. Learn. Organ. 12(5), 418–435 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoffman, D.L., Novak, T.P.: Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations. J. Mark. 60(3), 50 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lehmann, J., Lalmas, M., Yom-Tov, E., Dupret, G.: Models of user engagement. In: Masthoff, J., Mobasher, B., Desmarais, M.C., Nkambou, R. (eds.) UMAP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7379, pp. 164–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Musiał, K., Kazienko, P.: Social networks on the Internet. World Wide Web 16(1), 31–72 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peters, K., Chen, Y., Kaplan, A.M., Ognibeni, B., Pauwels, K.: Social media metrics a framework and guidelines for managing social media. J. Interact. Mark. 27(4), 281–298 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pletikosa Cvijikj, I., Dubach Spiegler, E., Michahelles, F.: Evaluation framework for social media brand presence. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 3(4), 1325–1349 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rao, A., Spasojevic, N., Li, Z., Dsouza, T.: Klout score: measuring influence across multiple social networks. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), pp. 2282–2289. IEEE, October 2015Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rowe, M., Alani, H.: Mining and comparing engagement dynamics across multiple social media platforms. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Conference on Web Science, WebSci 2014, pp. 229–238. ACM, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W.: The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Illinois (1949)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    de Vries, L., Gensler, S., Leeflang, P.S.: Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: an investigation of the effects of social media marketing. J. Interact. Mark. 26(2), 83–91 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Werthner, H., Alzua-Sorzabal, A., Cantoni, L., Dickinger, A., Gretzel, U., Jannach, D., Neidhardt, J., Pröll, B., Ricci, F., Scaglione, M., Stangl, B., Stock, O., Zanker, M.: Future research issues in IT and tourism. Inf. Technol. Tour. 15(1), 1–15 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yadav, M.S., de Valck, K., Hennig-Thurau, T., Hoffman, D.L., Spann, M.: Social commerce: a contingency framework for assessing marketing potential. J. Interact. Mark. 27(4), 311–323 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Semantic Technology Institute (STI) InnsbruckUniversity of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations